A comparison, based on the regression of 32 daily mean PM25 aerosol loadings determined by a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) and by a Harvard impactor (HI), is reported for the ambient aerosol of Erfurt (Germany). The PM2.5 concentrations measured by the TEOM were systematically lower then those obtained by the HI. The ratio of the means TEOM/HI was 0.74 and the regression equation is TEOM = 0.69 x HI + 0.071. This result is consistent with reports elsewhere suggesting that semi-volatile aerosol material is lost from the heated sample filter on the TEOM. To verify this assertion, a heating system was developed for the HI which was able to keep the HI sample filter at 50+/-1 degrees C. After the implementation of this heating system, no systematically differences were observed between the TEOM and the heated HI system. The ratio of means was 1.06 and the regression equation TEOM = 1.10 x HI - 0.668. Because the measured levels of ammonium nitrate were very low in Erfurt, we concluded that other compounds like semi-volatile organics were responsible for the loss of particulate material at 50 degrees C.