8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Cohort Studies

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proved to be effective on anticoagulation therapy in many diseases. However, the efficacy and the safety of DOACs in the secondary prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) remain unclear. To assess the value of DOACs in patients with CAT, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies.

          Methods: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their earliest date through to June 2018. Two investigators independently assessed eligibility. Data were extracted by one investigator and verified by the second investigator. The efficacy outcome of this study was recurrent VTE, whereas the safety outcome was major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Relative risks (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined. To pool the results, the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects models were used.

          Results: A total of nine articles (six randomized controlled trials and three prospective studies) involving 2,697 patients with CAT who were prescribed DOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran) and 2,852 patients who were prescribed traditional anticoagulants [vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), dalteparin, or enoxaparin] were compared. VTE recurrence in the DOAC group was significantly lower than that observed in the traditional anticoagulant group (RR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.49–0.75; I 2: 0%; p < 0.00001). No significant difference in bleeding risk between both groups was found (RR: 0.95; 95%CI: 0.67–1.36; I 2: 75%; p = 0.79).

          Conclusions: Our findings showed that anticoagulant therapy with DOACs may be more effective than traditional anticoagulants to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with CAT, while the safety of DOACs may be equal to that of traditional anticoagulants. These findings support the use of DOACs as the first-line therapy for secondary prevention of CAT in most cancer patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis.

          Cancer-associated venous thrombosis is a common condition, although the reported incidence varies widely between studies depending on patient population, start and duration of follow-up, and the method of detecting and reporting thrombotic events. Furthermore, as cancer is a heterogeneous disease, the risk of venous thrombosis depends on cancer types and stages, treatment measures, and patient-related factors. In general, cancer patients with venous thrombosis do not fare well and have an increased mortality compared with cancer patients without. This may be explained by the more aggressive type of malignancies associated with this condition. It is hypothesized that thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients might improve prognosis and quality of life by preventing thrombotic events. However, anticoagulant treatment leads to increased bleeding, particularly in this patient group, so in case of proven benefit of thromboprophylaxis, only patients with a high risk of venous thrombosis should be considered. This review describes the literature on incidence of and risk factors for cancer-associated venous thrombosis, with the aim to provide a basis for identification of high-risk patients and for further development and refinement of prediction models. Furthermore, knowledge on risk factors for cancer-related venous thrombosis may enhance the understanding of the pathophysiology of thrombosis in these patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tinzaparin vs Warfarin for Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Active Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

            Low-molecular-weight heparin is recommended over warfarin for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer largely based on results of a single, large trial.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety and effectiveness of oral rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (XALIA): an international, prospective, non-interventional study.

              The efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant rivaroxaban for the treatment and secondary prevention of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism has been shown in phase 3 trials. However, data about rivaroxaban use in routine clinical practice are needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                10 July 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 773
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University , Dalian, China
                [2] 2Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University , Dalian, China
                [3] 3Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [4] 4Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                Author notes

                Edited by: Amanj Kurdi, University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Tanja Mueller, University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom; Fariba Ahmadizar, Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Yunlong Xia, yunlong_xia@ 123456126.com ; Gary Tse, tseg@ 123456cuhk.edu.hk

                This article was submitted to Pharmaceutical Medicine and Outcomes Research, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2019.00773
                6635657
                31354488
                ae0480ee-5c37-4407-84aa-29c1c115be35
                Copyright © 2019 Wang, Lv, Li, Chen, Gu, Sun, Yang, Liu, Fang, Liu, Tse and Xia

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 April 2019
                : 14 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 28, Pages: 10, Words: 3732
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: 81570313, 81700245
                Funded by: Changjiang Scholar Program of Chinese Ministry of Education 10.13039/501100005240
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Systematic Review

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                direct oral anticoagulants (doacs),cancer-associated thrombosis (cat),secondary prevention,meta-analysis,randomized controlled trials (rcts),prospective cohort studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article