11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scaling up a health and nutrition hotline in Malawi: the benefits of multisectoral collaboration

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Carla Blauvelt and colleagues describe a multisectoral collaboration that enabled the scale up of a health advice telephone service and its transition to government in Malawi

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Women’s perspectives on quality of maternal health care services in Malawi

          Despite promotion by many stakeholders to improve maternal health outcome in many developing countries including Malawi, many analysts agree that the utmost success in maternal health will arise if maternal health care services are an unparallel led source for women’s health care solutions for any problem related to childbirth. Health advocates worldwide claim that even though maternal services are provided, women’s utilization of such services has not been ascertained. The objective of this study was to explore women’s perspectives on the quality of health care service delivery in Malawi. This article therefore investigates women’s perspectives on the quality of maternal health care services in Malawi. We used six focus group discussions in six health facilities that were selected across Malawi. We found that erratic availability of medical resources and unethical practices among health workers adversely affected quality of maternal health care service delivery. We concluded that the expensive routine operational audits of medical resources and service delivery across health facilities are imperative if women’s health outcomes are to be enhanced in Malawi.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Examination of patient flow in a rural health center in Malawi

            Background Malawi, like many low-income countries, is facing a severe health worker shortage. A potential stop-gap solution to this crisis is improving the efficiency of health center operations. Given the lack of research on center efficiency in rural health centers in Malawi, we conducted a study to identify deficiencies in center organization and barriers to patient flow. Methods We performed a time-motion survey at a rural health center in Ntaja, Malawi over a period of 1 week. We used a standardized questionnaire to collect information on the amount of time a patient spent with each health worker, the number of center staff that attended to each patient, and the total time spent at the center. Additionally, at the end of the visit, we conducted an exit survey to collect demographic information and data on perception of quality of care with the center visit for all patients. Results A total of 1018 patients were seen over the five-day study. The average total time spent at the center by the patients was 123 min (2–366 min). Adults had an average total time spent at the center of 111 min (2–366 min) and children 134 min (7–365 min). Patient waiting time (PWT) was higher in the early morning hours ranging from 157 min (between 06:00 and 08:00) to 53 min (between 14:00 and 16:00). Health worker contact time (HCT) was higher for adults (2.3 min) than children (1.7 min). Shorter wait times were associated with higher perceptions of quality of service. Conclusion Despite shortages in health workers and funds, opportunities are available to increase efficiency in rural health centers. By removing bottlenecks to increase the productivity of health workers, centers in low-income countries can treat more patients and improve service quality. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2144-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              Role: country director
              Role: director and group lead advocacy and communications
              Role: senior monitoring and evaluation adviser
              Role: deputy country director
              Role: director of the central monitoring and evaluation division
              Role: CCPF technical adviser
              Role: senior advocacy and communications adviser
              Role: independent consultant
              Journal
              BMJ
              BMJ
              BMJ-UK
              bmj
              The BMJ
              BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
              0959-8138
              1756-1833
              2018
              07 December 2018
              : 363
              : k4590
              Affiliations
              [1 ]VillageReach, Lilongwe, Malawi
              [2 ]VillageReach, Seattle, USA
              [3 ]Government of Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
              [4 ]London, UK
              Author notes
              Correspondence to: Carla Blauvelt, carla.blauvelt@ 123456villagereach.org
              Article
              blac047385
              10.1136/bmj.k4590
              6282726
              30530659
              ae04af10-b17d-4cff-ab89-935fea5cb61f
              Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

              This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction for non-commercial purposes in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

              History
              Categories
              Analysis
              Making Multisectoral Collaboration Work

              Medicine
              Medicine

              Comments

              Comment on this article