22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke: Old Wine in a New Bottle

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is currently Food and Drug Administration-approved for treatment of both medically refractory partial-onset seizures and severe, recurrent refractory depression, which has failed to respond to medical interventions. Because of its ability to regulate mechanisms well-studied in neuroscience, such as norepinephrine and serotonin release, the vagus nerve may play an important role in regulating cerebral blood flow, edema, inflammation, glutamate excitotoxicity, and neurotrophic processes. There is strong evidence that these same processes are important in stroke pathophysiology. We reviewed the literature for the role of VNS in improving ischemic stroke outcomes by performing a systematic search for publications in Medline (1966–2014) with keywords “VNS AND stroke” in subject headings and key words with no language restrictions. Of the 73 publications retrieved, we identified 7 studies from 3 different research groups that met our final inclusion criteria of research studies addressing the role of VNS in ischemic stroke. Results from these studies suggest that VNS has promising efficacy in reducing stroke volume and attenuating neurological deficits in ischemic stroke models. Given the lack of success in Phase III trials for stroke neuroprotection, it is important to develop new therapies targeting different neuroprotective pathways. Further studies of the possible role of VNS, through normally physiologically active mechanisms, in ischemic stroke therapeutics should be conducted in both animal models and clinical studies. In addition, recent advent of a non-invasive, transcutaneous VNS could provide the potential for easier clinical translation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A molecular and cellular theory of depression.

          Recent studies have begun to characterize the actions of stress and antidepressant treatments beyond the neurotransmitter and receptor level. This work has demonstrated that long-term antidepressant treatments result in the sustained activation of the cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate system in specific brain regions, including the increased function and expression of the transcription factor cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein. The activated cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate system leads to the regulation of specific target genes, including the increased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in certain populations of neurons in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. The importance of these changes is highlighted by the discovery that stress can decrease the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and lead to atrophy of these same populations of stress-vulnerable hippocampal neurons. The possibility that the decreased size and impaired function of these neurons may be involved in depression is supported by recent clinical imaging studies, which demonstrate a decreased volume of certain brain structures. These findings constitute the framework for an updated molecular and cellular hypothesis of depression, which posits that stress-induced vulnerability and the therapeutic action of antidepressant treatments occur via intracellular mechanisms that decrease or increase, respectively, neurotrophic factors necessary for the survival and function of particular neurons. This hypothesis also explains how stress and other types of neuronal insult can lead to depression in vulnerable individuals and it outlines novel targets for the rational design of fundamentally new therapeutic agents.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vagal nerve stimulation: a review of its applications and potential mechanisms that mediate its clinical effects.

            Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for epilepsy and is currently under investigation as a therapy for other disorders, including depression, anxiety and Alzheimer's disease. This review examines the pre-clinical and clinical literature relating to VNS. A brief historical perspective is given, followed by consideration of the efficacy of the various clinical applications of VNS. Finally, what is known about the mechanism by which VNS exerts clinical benefit is considered. It is concluded that although the precise mechanism of action of VNS is still unknown, the search for the mechanism has the potential to lend new insight into the neuropathology of depression. It is important that prior assumptions about the influence of VNS on particular aspects of brain function do not constrain the investigations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increased extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine in cortex and hippocampus following vagus nerve stimulation in the rat.

              The vagus nerve is an important source of afferent information about visceral states and it provides input to the locus coeruleus (LC), the major source of norepinephrine (NE) in the brain. It has been suggested that the effects of electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve on learning and memory, mood, seizure suppression, and recovery of function following brain damage are mediated, in part, by the release of brain NE. The hypothesis that left vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at the cervical level results in increased extracellular NE concentrations in the cortex and hippocampus was tested at four stimulus intensities: 0.0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mA. Stimulation at 0.0 and 0.25 mA had no effect on NE concentrations, while the 0.5 mA stimulation increased NE concentrations significantly in the hippocampus (23%), but not the cortex. However, 1.0 mA stimulation significantly increased NE concentrations in both the cortex (39%) and hippocampus (28%) bilaterally. The increases in NE were transient and confined to the stimulation periods. VNS did not alter NE concentrations in either structure during the inter-stimulation baseline periods. No differences were observed between NE levels in the initial baseline and the post-stimulation baselines. These findings support the hypothesis that VNS increases extracellular NE concentrations in both the hippocampus and cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/167019
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/12752
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/158612
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                24 June 2014
                2014
                : 5
                : 107
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Neurology, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, USA
                [2] 2Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, USA
                [3] 3Department of Surgery, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, USA
                [4] 4Department of Radiology, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, USA
                [5] 5Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Bruce Coull, University of Arizona, USA

                Reviewed by: Bin Jiang, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, China; Po-Yi Tsai, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan; Yang-Ming National University, Taiwan

                *Correspondence: Vishnumurthy Shushrutha Hedna, Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Room L3-100, McKnight Brain Institute, 1149 Newell Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA e-mail: vhedna@ 123456neurology.ufl.edu

                This article was submitted to Stroke, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology.

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2014.00107
                4067569
                25009531
                ae10ab80-1191-4682-9fa0-d0bf6816f20d
                Copyright © 2014 Cai, Bodhit, Derequito, Ansari, Abukhalil, Thenkabail, Ganji, Saravanapavan, Shekar, Bidari, Waters and Hedna.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 08 May 2014
                : 11 June 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 58, Pages: 8, Words: 5645
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review Article

                Neurology
                stroke,middle cerebral artery occlusion,glutamate excitotoxicity,neuroinflammation,cerebral blood flow

                Comments

                Comment on this article