15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trade-offs between sperm viability and immune protein expression in honey bee queens ( Apis mellifera)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Queens of many social hymenoptera keep sperm alive within their specialized storage organ, the spermatheca, for years, defying the typical trade-off between lifespan and reproduction. However, whether honey bee ( Apis mellifera) queens experience a trade-off between reproduction and immunity is unknown, and the biochemical processes underlying sperm viability are poorly understood. Here, we survey quality metrics and viral loads of honey bee queens from nine genetic sources. Queens rated as ‘failed’ by beekeepers had lower sperm viability, fewer sperm, and higher levels of sacbrood virus and black queen cell virus. Quantitative proteomics on N = 123 spermathecal fluid samples shows, after accounting for sperm count, health status, and apiary effects, five spermathecal fluid proteins significantly correlating with sperm viability: odorant binding protein (OBP)14, lysozyme, serpin 88Ea, artichoke, and heat-shock protein (HSP)10. The significant negative correlation of lysozyme—a conserved immune effector—with sperm viability is consistent with a reproduction vs. immunity trade-off in honey bee queens.

          Abstract

          Honey bee queens store and use sperm for years after mating, but doing so may require a dampened immune response to keep the sperm viable. Alison McAfee et al. tested this hypothesis using mass spectrometry-based proteomics in queens with high and low sperm quantity and quality and found that lower measures of fertility correlated with high levels of the immune effector lysozyme, consistent with a trade-off between immunity and fertility.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS

          Biological Reviews, 45(4), 525-567
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology

            In the face of continuous threats from parasites, hosts have evolved an elaborate series of preventative and controlling measures - the immune system - in order to reduce the fitness costs of parasitism. However, these measures do have associated costs. Viewing an individual's immune response to parasites as being subject to optimization in the face of other demands offers potential insights into mechanisms of life history trade-offs, sexual selection, parasite-mediated selection and population dynamics. We discuss some recent results that have been obtained by practitioners of this approach in natural and semi-natural populations, and suggest some ways in which this field may progress in the near future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Immune defense and host life history.

              Recent interest has focused on immune response in an evolutionary context, with particular attention to disease resistance as a life-history trait, subject to trade-offs against other traits such as reproductive effort. Immune defense has several characteristics that complicate this approach, however; for example, because of the risk of autoimmunity, optimal immune defense is not necessarily maximum immune defense. Two important types of cost associated with immunity in the context of life history are resource costs, those related to the allocation of essential but limited resources, such as energy or nutrients, and option costs, those paid not in the currency of resources but in functional or structural components of the organism. Resource and option costs are likely to apply to different aspects of resistance. Recent investigations into possible trade-offs between reproductive effort, particularly sexual displays, and immunity have suggested interesting functional links between the two. Although all organisms balance the costs of immune defense against the requirements of reproduction, this balance works out differently for males than it does for females, creating sex differences in immune response that in turn are related to ecological factors such as the mating system. We conclude that immune response is indeed costly and that future work would do well to include invertebrates, which have sometimes been neglected in studies of the ecology of immune defense.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alison.n.mcafee@gmail.com
                Journal
                Commun Biol
                Commun Biol
                Communications Biology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2399-3642
                8 January 2021
                8 January 2021
                2021
                : 4
                : 48
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.40803.3f, ISNI 0000 0001 2173 6074, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, , North Carolina State University, ; Raleigh, NC USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, , Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, BC Canada
                [3 ]Pettis and Associates LLC, Salisbury, MD USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-6649
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-6709
                Article
                1586
                10.1038/s42003-020-01586-w
                7794525
                33420325
                ae3287cc-a0d3-4ba4-a88c-a40ebe637242
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 June 2020
                : 10 December 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000038, Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada);
                Award ID: 532584
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100010707, Canadian Bee Research Fund (CBRF);
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004489, Mitacs;
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100005825, United States Department of Agriculture | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA);
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                agriculture,biochemistry,hormones,proteomics
                agriculture, biochemistry, hormones, proteomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article