116
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New feed sources key to ambitious climate targets

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Net carbon sinks capable of avoiding dangerous perturbation of the climate system and preventing ocean acidification have been identified, but they are likely to be limited by resource constraints (Nature 463:747–756, 2010). Land scarcity already creates tension between food security and bioenergy production, and this competition is likely to intensify as populations and the effects of climate change expand. Despite research into microalgae as a next-generation energy source, the land-sparing consequences of alternative sources of livestock feed have been overlooked. Here we use the FeliX model to quantify emissions pathways when microalgae is used as a feedstock to free up to 2 billion hectares of land currently used for pasture and feed crops. Forest plantations established on these areas can conceivably meet 50 % of global primary energy demand, resulting in emissions mitigation from the energy and LULUC sectors of up to 544 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\pm$$\end{document} 107 PgC by 2100. Further emissions reductions from carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology can reduce global atmospheric carbon concentrations close to preindustrial levels by the end of the present century. Though previously thought unattainable, carbon sinks and climate change mitigation of this magnitude are well within the bounds of technological feasibility.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13021-015-0040-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks.

          Algae are an attractive source of biomass energy since they do not compete with food crops and have higher energy yields per area than terrestrial crops. In spite of these advantages, algae cultivation has not yet been compared with conventional crops from a life cycle perspective. In this work, the impacts associated with algae production were determined using a stochastic life cycle model and compared with switchgrass, canola, and corn farming. The results indicate that these conventional crops have lower environmental impacts than algae in energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and water regardless of cultivation location. Only in total land use and eutrophication potential do algae perform favorably. The large environmental footprint of algae cultivation is driven predominantly by upstream impacts, such as the demand for CO(2) and fertilizer. To reduce these impacts, flue gas and, to a greater extent, wastewater could be used to offset most of the environmental burdens associated with algae. To demonstrate the benefits of algae production coupled with wastewater treatment, the model was expanded to include three different municipal wastewater effluents as sources of nitrogen and phosphorus. Each provided a significant reduction in the burdens of algae cultivation, and the use of source-separated urine was found to make algae more environmentally beneficial than the terrestrial crops.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Competition for land

            A key challenge for humanity is how a future global population of 9 billion can all be fed healthily and sustainably. Here, we review how competition for land is influenced by other drivers and pressures, examine land-use change over the past 20 years and consider future changes over the next 40 years. Competition for land, in itself, is not a driver affecting food and farming in the future, but is an emergent property of other drivers and pressures. Modelling studies suggest that future policy decisions in the agriculture, forestry, energy and conservation sectors could have profound effects, with different demands for land to supply multiple ecosystem services usually intensifying competition for land in the future. In addition to policies addressing agriculture and food production, further policies addressing the primary drivers of competition for land (population growth, dietary preference, protected areas, forest policy) could have significant impacts in reducing competition for land. Technologies for increasing per-area productivity of agricultural land will also be necessary. Key uncertainties in our projections of competition for land in the future relate predominantly to uncertainties in the drivers and pressures within the scenarios, in the models and data used in the projections and in the policy interventions assumed to affect the drivers and pressures in the future.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                walsh@iiasa.ac.at
                rydzak@iiasa.ac.at
                palazzo@iiasa.ac.at
                kraxner@iiasa.ac.at
                Mario.Herrero@csiro.au
                p.schenk@uq.edu.au
                philippe.ciais@lsce.ipsl.fr
                ivan.janssens@uantwerpen.be
                josep.penuelas@uab.cat
                analysen@gmx.at
                oberstei@iiasa.ac.at
                Journal
                Carbon Balance Manag
                Carbon Balance Manag
                Carbon Balance and Management
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1750-0680
                1 December 2015
                1 December 2015
                December 2015
                : 10
                : 1
                : 26
                Affiliations
                [ ]Ecosystems Services and Management, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg, Austria
                [ ]Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Australia
                [ ]Algae Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
                [ ]Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L’Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                [ ]University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
                [ ]CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Cerdanyola del Valles (Catalonia), Spain
                [ ]CREAF, Cerdanyola del Valles (Catalonia), Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1689-2309
                Article
                40
                10.1186/s13021-015-0040-7
                4666903
                ae332246-0e86-4c55-aaab-716fae0346d1
                © Walsh et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 23 October 2015
                : 27 November 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Environmental change
                protein,livestock,biofuels,climate change,food security,beccs,ccs,felix
                Environmental change
                protein, livestock, biofuels, climate change, food security, beccs, ccs, felix

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log