0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of new pacemaker implantation following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement on 1-year outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVES

          The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of new pacemaker implantation (NPMI) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and investigate its influence on 1-year mortality.

          METHODS

          Patients who were enrolled in ‘The German Aortic Valve Registry’ undergoing isolated TAVR or SAVR between 2011 and 2015 were analysed. The rate of NPMI was analysed for both groups and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the possible independent association between NPMI and 1-year mortality.

          RESULTS

          Twenty thousand eight hundred and seventy-two patients who underwent TAVR and 17 750 patients who received SAVR were included in this study. The rate of NPMI was 16.6% after TAVR and 3.6% after SAVR. In the TAVR group, NPMI was associated with significantly increased 1-year mortality in univariable Cox regression analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.29, confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.41; P < 0.001]. This association persisted after adjustment for confounding factors (HR 1.29, CI 1.16–1.43; P < 0.001). In the SAVR group, NPMI significantly increased 1-year mortality in univariable analysis as well (HR 1.55, CI 1.08–2.22; P = 0.02), whereas after multivariable adjustment, NPMI did not emerge as an independent risk factor (HR 1.29, 0.88–1.89; P = 0.19). NPMI was not associated with 30-day mortality in both procedure groups.

          CONCLUSIONS

          The rate of NPMI was markedly higher after TAVR compared with SAVR and was independently associated with 1-year mortality after TAVR, whereas this was not significant after SAVR. As 30-day mortality was not different for TAVR and SAVR, the subsequent procedure of an NPMI itself seems not to increase the risk of mortality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

          Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an option in certain high-risk surgical patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. It is unknown whether TAVR can be safely introduced to lower-risk patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence and predictors of short- and long-term complications in pacemaker therapy: the FOLLOWPACE study.

            Today quantitative information about the type of complications and their incidence during long-term pacemaker (PM) follow-up is scarce. To assess the incidence and determinants of short- and long-term complications after first pacemaker implantation for bradycardia. A prospective multicenter cohort study (the FOLLOWPACE study) was conducted among 1517 patients receiving a PM between January 2003 and November 2007. The independent association of patient and implantation-procedure characteristics with the incidence of PM complications was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression analysis. A total of 1517 patients in 23 Dutch PM centers were followed for a mean of 5.8 years (SD 1.1), resulting in 8797 patient-years. Within 2 months, 188 (12.4%) patients developed PM complications. Male gender, age at implantation, body mass index, a history of cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, use of anticoagulant drugs, and passive atrial lead fixation were independent predictors for complications within 2 months, yielding a C-index of 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.66). Annual hospital implanting volume did not additionally contribute to the prediction of short-term complications. Thereafter, 140 (9.2%) patients experienced complications, mostly lead-related complications (n = 84). Independent predictors for long-term complications were age, body mass index, hypertension, and a dual-chamber device, yielding a C-index of 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.67). The occurrence of a short-term PM complication was not predictive of future PM complications. Complication incidence in modern pacing therapy is still substantial. Most complications occur early after PM implantation. Although various patient- and procedure-related characteristics are independent predictors for early and late complications, their ability to identify the patient at high risk is rather poor. This relatively high incidence of PM complications and their poor prediction underscores the usefulness of current guidelines for regular follow-up of patients with PM. Copyright © 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry.

              The purpose of this study was to identify predictors and clinical implications of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1010-7940
                1873-734X
                January 2020
                January 01 2020
                June 14 2019
                January 2020
                January 01 2020
                June 14 2019
                : 57
                : 1
                : 151-159
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [3 ]Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Cardiology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
                [5 ]German Society of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Cardiology, Robert-Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
                [7 ]Department of Internal Medicine I, St.-Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
                [8 ]Department of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
                [9 ]BQS Institute for Quality and Patient Safety, Düsseldorf, Germany
                [10 ]Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany
                [11 ]Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Faculty of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [12 ]Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [13 ]Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Klinikum Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany
                Article
                10.1093/ejcts/ezz168
                31199470
                ae3c1919-472e-4b18-a3e6-77ef5a7b9875
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article