8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Referral Center Experience With Nonpalpable Contraceptive Implant Removals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To describe our experience with office removal of nonpalpable contraceptive implants at our referral center.

          Methods

          We performed a retrospective cohort study by reviewing the charts of patients referred to our Family Planning specialty center for nonpalpable or complex contraceptive implant removal from January 2015 through December 2018. We localized nonpalpable implants using high-frequency ultrasonography and skin mapping in radiology, followed by attempted removal in the office using local anesthesia and a modified vasectomy clamp. We abstracted information on demographics, implant location, and outcomes.

          Results

          Of 61 referrals, 55 patients attended their scheduled appointment. Seven patients had palpable implants; six elected removal. The other 48 patients had ultrasound localization, which identified 47 (98%) of the implants; the remaining patient had successful localization with computed tomography imaging. Nonpalpable implants were suprafascial (n=22), subfascial (n=25) and intrafascial (n=1); four of these patients opted to delay removal. Of 50 attempted office removals, all palpable (n=6), all non-palpable suprafascial (n=21 [100%, 95% CI 83–100%]), and 19/23 (83%, 95% CI 67–98%) subfascial implants were successful. Three of the four patients with failed subfascial implant office removal had successful operating room removal with a collaborative orthopedic surgeon; the other patient sought removal elsewhere. Transient postprocedure neuropathic complaints were noted in 7/23 (30%, 95% CI 12–49%) subfascial and 1/21 (5%, 95% CI 0–13%) suprafascial removals (P=.048). Nonpalpable implants were more likely to be subfascial in nonobese (24/34, 71%) as compared to obese (1/13, 8%) patients (P<.001). Seven (28%) of the 25 subfascially located implants had been inserted during a removal–reinsertion procedure through the same incision.

          Conclusion

          Most nonpalpable contraceptive implants can be removed in the office by an experienced subspecialty health care provider after ultrasound localization. Some patients may experience transient postprocedure neuropathic pain. Nonpalpable implants in thinner women are more likely to be in a subfascial location.

          Précis

          Most nonpalpable contraceptive implants can be removed in the office by an experienced subspecialty health care provider after ultrasound localization.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0401101
          6204
          Obstet Gynecol
          Obstet Gynecol
          Obstetrics and gynecology
          0029-7844
          1873-233X
          16 July 2019
          October 2019
          01 October 2020
          : 134
          : 4
          : 801-806
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis; Sacramento, CA
          [2 ] Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis; Sacramento, CA
          Author notes
          [a]

          Current affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles, CA

          [b]

          Current affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Mountain View, CA

          Corresponding author: Melissa C. Matulich, MD, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA 95817, 916-734-6670, mcmatulich@ 123456ucdavis.edu
          Article
          PMC6768758 PMC6768758 6768758 nihpa1534697
          10.1097/AOG.0000000000003457
          6768758
          31503148
          ae4308fa-1998-4d14-be1d-a969620b7f8e
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article