9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      To lie or to tell the truth? The influence of processing the opponent’s feedback on the forthcoming choice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The brain mechanisms of deceptive behavior are relatively well studied, and the key brain regions involved in its processing were established. At the same time, the brain mechanisms underlying the processes of preparation for deception are less known.

          Methods

          We studied BOLD-signal changes during the presentation of the opponent’s feedback to a previous deceptive or honest action during the computer game. The goal of the game was to mislead the opponent either by means of deception or by means of telling the truth.

          Results

          As a result, it was shown that several brain regions that were previously demonstrated as involved in deception execution, such as the left anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula, also underlie processes related to deception preparation.

          Discussion

          The results obtained also allowed us to suggest that brain regions responsible for performance monitoring, intention assessment, suppression of non-selected solutions, and reward processing could be involved in shaping future action selection and preparation for deception. By shedding light on the brain mechanisms underlying deception, our study contributes to a deeper understanding of this complex cognitive process. Furthermore, it emphasizes the significance of exploring brain mechanisms governing the choice between deception and truth at various stages of decision-making.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

            We review evidence for partially segregated networks of brain areas that carry out different attentional functions. One system, which includes parts of the intraparietal cortex and superior frontal cortex, is involved in preparing and applying goal-directed (top-down) selection for stimuli and responses. This system is also modulated by the detection of stimuli. The other system, which includes the temporoparietal cortex and inferior frontal cortex, and is largely lateralized to the right hemisphere, is not involved in top-down selection. Instead, this system is specialized for the detection of behaviourally relevant stimuli, particularly when they are salient or unexpected. This ventral frontoparietal network works as a 'circuit breaker' for the dorsal system, directing attention to salient events. Both attentional systems interact during normal vision, and both are disrupted in unilateral spatial neglect.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind.

              Survival can depend on the ability to change a current course of action to respond to potentially advantageous or threatening stimuli. This "reorienting" response involves the coordinated action of a right hemisphere dominant ventral frontoparietal network that interrupts and resets ongoing activity and a dorsal frontoparietal network specialized for selecting and linking stimuli and responses. At rest, each network is distinct and internally correlated, but when attention is focused, the ventral network is suppressed to prevent reorienting to distracting events. These different patterns of recruitment may reflect inputs to the ventral attention network from the locus coeruleus/norepinephrine system. While originally conceptualized as a system for redirecting attention from one object to another, recent evidence suggests a more general role in switching between networks, which may explain recent evidence of its involvement in functions such as social cognition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1588101/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/400536/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1563199/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/45145/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                09 May 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1275884
                Affiliations
                N.P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Science , Saint Petersburg, Russia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sandra Racionero-Plaza, University of Barcelona, Spain

                Reviewed by: Yayoi Shigemune, Tohoku Fukushi University, Japan

                Judee K. Burgoon, University of Arizona, United States

                *Correspondence: Maxim Kireev, kireev@ 123456ihb.spb.ru
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1275884
                11112074
                38784609
                ae715fd1-2ef4-48f5-b9c0-d19fd0bec068
                Copyright © 2024 Zheltyakova, Korotkov, Cherednichenko, Didur and Kireev.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 August 2023
                : 22 April 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 79, Pages: 16, Words: 10179
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 23–18-00521). The experimental fMRI data used in the current study were collected as part of the research project supported by the state assignment of IHB RAS.
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Decision Neuroscience

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                deception,reward,feedback,decision-making,fmri
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                deception, reward, feedback, decision-making, fmri

                Comments

                Comment on this article