3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      European principles of inhibitor management in patients with haemophilia: implications of new treatment options

      letter
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 2 , on behalf of the European Haemophilia Consortium (EHC) and the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD)
      Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
      BioMed Central
      Haemophilia, Guidelines, Inhibitors, Factor VIII, Factor IX, Bypassing agents, Emicizumab, Immune tolerance

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In light of the rapidly changing landscape of haemophilia treatment, the authors of the position paper on the “European Principles of Inhibitor Management” published in 2018 (Table 1) [1] now provide an update on the major impact of novel therapies that bypass and/or substitute clotting factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) in the care of haemophilia patients with FVIII- or FIX-neutralizing allo-inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors). Table 1 European principles of inhibitor management in patients with haemophilia [1] 1. Lifelong Awareness of the Incidence of Inhibitors and Risk Factors 2. Early Recognition and accurate diagnosis 3. Organisation of Care and Communication Between All Stakeholders 4. Inhibitor eradication by Immune Tolerance Induction Therapy 5. Hemostatic Treatment with Bypassing Agents 6. Access to and Optimal Preparation for Surgery and Invasive Procedures 7. Delivery of Specialist Nursing Care 8. Provision of Tailored Physiotherapy Care 9. Access to Psychosocial Support 10. Involvement in the Research and Innovation The most advanced novel agent is undoubtedly emicizumab (Hemlibra®, Roche), a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of FVIII and facilitates the coagulation cascade in haemophilia A patients both with and without inhibitors as it is not recognized by FVIII-neutralizing allo-inhibitory antibodies. Phase III clinical trials in adults (HAVEN 1) and children (HAVEN 2) have shown significant overall bleed reduction compared to prophylaxis with classical bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors [2, 3]. This molecule is administered subcutaneously, once a week or less frequently, greatly alleviating the burden of intravenous injections, especially in paediatric patients with inhibitors. Emicizumab is currently the only novel marketed agent and is increasingly accessible for people with haemophilia A with and without inhibitors [4]. In many developed countries, emicizumab has become the prophylactic agent of choice for patients with persistent inhibitors against FVIII with major reported benefits [5]. Several other novel agents are in different stages of development and will probably also have a major impact on the care of haemophilia patients. A new recombinant activated human factor VII (rFVIIa) variant with four amino acid substitutions (marzeptacog alfa (activated) (MarzAA)), has increased catalytic activity and prolonged half-life which allows subcutaneous dosing [6]. Other new agents which downregulate natural anticoagulants, thereby rebalancing haemostasis, are currently under study in patients with haemophilia A and B. These agents work either by blocking tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) using subcutaneous monoclonal antibodies (concizumab, NovoNordisk; marstacimab, Pfizer) or knocking down antithrombin synthesis through a subcutaneous double-stranded small interfering RNA (Alnylam) [7]. Haemophilia B patients with inhibitors, who have been clinically the most underserved subpopulation, may benefit the most from these new agents. Emicizumab and the other agents described above will certainly have a major impact, as described below, in the care of patients with inhibitors. This is summarized in the 10 revised principles of inhibitor management originally proposed in 2018. Awareness of the incidence of inhibitors and risk factors throughout life The bispecific antibody, emicizumab, has the potential to modify the natural history of inhibitor development in some patients, especially in previously untreated patients (PUPs) treated with this agent early in life to avoid exposure to exogenous FVIII. More data shall become available about the role, safety and efficacy of emicizumab in PUPs [8–10] as well as in Previously Treated Patients (PTPs). Early recognition and accurate diagnosis The importance of early recognition and accurate diagnosis of patients developing inhibitors remains of high importance, regardless of the availability of these new agents. It is recommended for patients with inhibitors to have their inhibitor titre checked regularly, at least once per year and, most importantly, before any invasive procedure. Appropriate assays for inhibitor detection and quantification should be used in patients treated with emicizumab [11]. Optimal organization of care and communication between all stakeholders Availability of a bispecific antibody and other novel agents will most likely impact significantly on how care of inhibitor patients is organised. As stated jointly by the European Haemophilia Consortium (EHC) and European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD), supervision of patients on novel treatment products should be exclusively conducted in European Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centres (EHCCCs) or European Haemophilia Treatment Centres (EHTCs), thus increasing the necessity of good communication between healthcare professionals involved. The frequency of visits of inhibitor patients to their treating specialists will probably diminish due to the less intensive treatment regimens and subcutaneous administration of the novel products. Measures should be taken to avoid negative impact of changes related to these treatment innovations on the patient-doctor relationships, in particular regular multidisciplinary follow-up by the EHCCCs with the crucial support and involvement of patients’ organisations. A major responsibility for these expert centers will also be to carefully monitor potential adverse events which may be different from those seen with rFVIIa and aPCC (such as arterial or venous thrombotic events or thrombotic microangiopathy). Access to haemostatic agents While inhibitors can be eradicated in patients who have access and a positive response to immune tolerance induction therapy, the inhibitors persist in many patients. These patients standardly require regular treatment with bypassing agents, ideally administered prophylactically. The bispecific antibody and other novel agents should be readily available, when licensed, especially for patients with persistent inhibitors. Clear protocols should be put in place for the management of breakthrough bleeds, as well as for the co-administration of clotting factor concentrates or bypassing agents in case of invasive procedures [12, 13]. Inhibitor eradication by immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy Inhibitor eradication by immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the best option for patients with inhibitors [14]. Treatment with the bispecific antibody or other novel agents should be considered if ITI cannot be conducted or was not successful. Studies are currently ongoing to evaluate the impact of these new agents on ITI indications and modalities [15–17]. Access to, and optimal preparation for, surgery and other invasive procedures Availability of the bispecific antibody and other novel therapies currently evaluated in trials has a substantial impact on access and modalities of invasive procedures and surgery for people with inhibitors. Minor invasive procedures, e.g. dental extraction or central venous access device insertion, can be successfully performed with the bispecific antibody without FVIII and tranexamic acid, given that there is a close collaboration between the haematologist and the specialist performing the procedure. Careful planning and timing of major elective surgery is mandatory, along with well-designed protocols for co-administration of bypassing agent(s) during surgery [12;13]. The current inhibitor titre at the time of surgery should be properly determined in order to evaluate whether replacement therapy with FVIII or FIX concentrates represents an alternative to the use of bypassing agents. Provision of specialist nursing care It is crucial to provide nurses with continuous and practical education about the bispecific antibody and other emerging therapies, including awareness and understanding of their respective mode of action, the precautions of use, situations requiring co-treatments with factor concentrates or bypassing agents, skills for intravenous and subcutaneous infusions … Provision of tailored physiotherapy care and monitoring The use of the bispecific antibody allows inhibitor patients to engage in various types of physical activities and for those already disabled has the potential to convert them into ambulatory patients, as reported previously with aPCC given prophylactically and combined with active physiotherapy [18]. Regular musculoskeletal assessment and physical coaching by experts in physiotherapy attached to EHCCCs or EHTCS should be provided to patients switched to new agents in order to prepare them physically and mentally for this important transition. However, permanent irreversible joint damage and chronic pain remain challenges that require continued tailored physiotherapy care and monitoring in the era of new therapies. Access to psychosocial support The new perspectives opened by a life with much fewer bleeds and less treatment burden require major individual mental, physical and social adaptation that could benefit from the support of psychosocial experts within the multidisciplinary team. Involvement in research and innovation Clinical data on the use of the bispecific antibody and other novel products in the real life remain scarce, especially in the cohort of inhibitor patients. Thus, it is essential to collect treatment and outcome data regularly in the frame of international registries and/or pharmacovigilance programs. Further international, multicentric and collaborative studies and research initiatives exploring the impact and modalities of use of the novel therapies in patients with inhibitor should be encouraged and promoted. Conclusion As described above, adoption of novel non-replacement therapies for haemophilia will have a major impact on each of the 10 principles of inhibitor management published in 2018. This amendment of the 10 principles appears as a very important advocacy tool and framework in order to promote access and proper use of these revolutionary therapies for all stakeholders actively involved in the care of patients with inhibitors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A multicenter, open-label phase 3 study of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A with inhibitors

          In a Plenary Paper, Young et al describe impressive favorable outcomes of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors, reporting a 99% reduction in annualized bleeding, with 77% of patients having no treated bleeding events.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Molecular Revolution in the Treatment of Hemophilia

            For decades, the monogenetic bleeding disorders hemophilia A and B (coagulation factor VIII and IX deficiency) have been treated with systemic protein replacement therapy. Now, diverse molecular medicines, ranging from antibody to gene to RNA therapy, are transforming treatment. Traditional replacement therapy requires twice to thrice weekly intravenous infusions of factor. While extended half-life products may reduce the frequency of injections, patients continue to face a lifelong burden of the therapy, suboptimal protection from bleeding and joint damage, and potential development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (inhibitors) that require less efficacious bypassing agents and further reduce quality of life. Novel non-replacement and gene therapies aim to address these remaining issues. A recently approved factor VIII-mimetic antibody accomplishes hemostatic correction in patients both with and without inhibitors. Antibodies against tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and antithrombin-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) target natural anticoagulant pathways to rebalance hemostasis. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy provides lasting clotting factor replacement and can also be used to induce immune tolerance. Multiple gene-editing techniques are under clinical or preclinical investigation. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of these approaches, explain how they differ from standard therapies, and predict how the hemophilia treatment landscape will be reshaped.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The changing face of immune tolerance induction in haemophilia A with the advent of emicizumab

              Abstract Introduction As a result of the new treatment paradigm that the haemophilia community will face with the availability of novel (non‐factor) therapies, an updated consensus on ITI recommendations and inhibitor management strategies is needed. Aim The Future of Immunotolerance Treatment (FIT) group was established to contemplate, determine and recommend the best management options for patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors. Discussion and Conclusions Despite the considerable success of emicizumab in the management of inhibitor patients, the FIT group still sees the importance of eradicating inhibitors. However, the availability of emicizumab and other non‐factor therapies in the future might impact greatly on how ITI is undertaken. Theoretically, concomitant use of emicizumab and FVIII might allow emicizumab to effectively prevent bleeding with lower dose ITI regimens. This might allow for the greater adoption of low‐dose/low‐frequency FVIII ITI regimens, which may result in a reduced need for central venous access devices while still maintaining a reasonable likelihood of ITI success. The FIT group proposes a new management algorithm for current ITI (without emicizumab) and a hypothetical new approach with the availability of emicizumab. As there are no published data regarding the concomitant use of emicizumab and FVIII for ITI, the FIT Expert group encourages the undertaking of properly conducted prospective studies to explore these approaches further.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cedric.hermans@uclouvain.be
                Journal
                Orphanet J Rare Dis
                Orphanet J Rare Dis
                Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
                BioMed Central (London )
                1750-1172
                24 August 2020
                24 August 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 219
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.48769.34, ISNI 0000 0004 0461 6320, Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Division of Haematology, , Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), ; Brussels, Belgium
                [2 ]European Haemophilia Consortium, Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.8217.c, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9705, Trinity College, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [5 ]GRID grid.7692.a, ISNI 0000000090126352, Department of Rehabilitation, Nursing Science and Sports, , University Medical Center Utrecht, ; Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.127050.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0249 951X, Canterbury Christ Church University, ; Kent, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.412685.c, ISNI 0000000406190087, National Hemophilia Center, Dept. of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, , School of Medicine of Comenius University and University Hospital, ; Bratislava, Slovakia
                [8 ]GRID grid.10267.32, ISNI 0000 0001 2194 0956, Children’s University Hospital and Masaryk University, ; Brno, Czech Republic
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-8437
                Article
                1511
                10.1186/s13023-020-01511-8
                7444030
                32831110
                ae747db0-5e9e-4f68-9158-19ce9f9e56b6
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 10 February 2020
                : 13 August 2020
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                haemophilia,guidelines,inhibitors,factor viii,factor ix,bypassing agents,emicizumab,immune tolerance

                Comments

                Comment on this article