10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy in young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: an adapted model.

      Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
      Age Factors, Cerebral Cortex, pathology, Cerebral Palsy, physiopathology, rehabilitation, Child, Preschool, Demography, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Movement Techniques, Female, Hand Strength, physiology, Hemiplegia, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Leukomalacia, Periventricular, Logistic Models, Male, Motor Skills, Movement, Neurologic Examination, methods, Physical Therapy Modalities, Time Factors

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a modified version of constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy on bimanual hand-use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP; age range 18 mo to 4 y) and to make a comparison with conventional paediatric treatment. Twenty-one children (13 females, eight males) completed the CI therapy programme and 20 children (12 males, eight females) served as a control group. Children in the CI therapy group were expected to wear a restraint glove for 2 hours each day over a period of 2 months. The training was based on principles of motor learning used in play and in motivational settings. To evaluate the effect of treatment, the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) was used. Assessments took place on three occasions: at onset, after 2 months, and 6 months after the first assessment. A significant interaction was found between group and AHA measure (ANOVA, F(2,74) = 5.64, p = 0.005). The children who received CI therapy improved their ability to use their hemiplegic hand significantly more than the children in the control group after 2 months, i.e. after treatment. Effect size was high after treatment and remained medium at 6 months. As the treatment was tailored to each child's capacity and interests, little frustration was experienced by the children.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article