9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High dose oral rifampicin to improve survival from adult tuberculous meningitis: A randomised placebo-controlled double-blinded phase III trial (the HARVEST study)

      research-article
      a , 1 , b , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 10 , 10 , 12 , 9 , 8 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 7 , 17 , 11 , 7 , 18 , 6 , 19 , 9 , 20 , 2
      Wellcome Open Research
      F1000 Research Limited
      Tuberculous Meningitis, TB, rifampicin, Xpert Ultra, HIV, treatment, RCT

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM), the most severe form of tuberculosis (TB), results in death or neurological disability in >50%, despite World Health Organisation recommended therapy. Current TBM regimen dosages are based on data from pulmonary TB alone. Evidence from recent phase II pharmacokinetic studies suggests that high dose rifampicin (R) administered intravenously or orally enhances central nervous system penetration and may reduce TBM associated mortality. We hypothesize that, among persons with TBM, high dose oral rifampicin (35 mg/kg) for 8 weeks will improve survival compared to standard of care (10 mg/kg), without excess adverse events.

          Protocol: We will perform a parallel group, randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind, phase III multicentre clinical trial comparing high dose oral rifampicin to standard of care. The trial will be conducted across five clinical sites in Uganda, South Africa and Indonesia. Participants are HIV-positive or negative adults with clinically suspected TBM, who will be randomised (1:1) to one of two arms: 35 mg/kg oral rifampicin daily for 8 weeks (in combination with standard dose isoniazid [H], pyrazinamide [Z] and ethambutol [E]) or standard of care (oral HRZE, containing 10 mg/kg/day rifampicin). The primary end-point is 6-month survival. Secondary end points are: i) 12-month survival ii) functional and neurocognitive outcomes and iii) safety and tolerability. Tertiary outcomes are: i) pharmacokinetic outcomes and ii) cost-effectiveness of the intervention. We will enrol 500 participants over 2.5 years, with follow-up continuing until 12 months post-enrolment.

          Discussion: Our best TBM treatment still results in unacceptably high mortality and morbidity. Strong evidence supports the increased cerebrospinal fluid penetration of high dose rifampicin, however conclusive evidence regarding survival benefit is lacking. This study will answer the important question of whether high dose oral rifampicin conveys a survival benefit in TBM in HIV-positive and -negative individuals from Africa and Asia.

          Trial registration: ISRCTN15668391 (17/06/2019)

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tuberculous meningitis: a uniform case definition for use in clinical research.

          Tuberculous meningitis causes substantial mortality and morbidity in children and adults. More research is urgently needed to better understand the pathogenesis of disease and to improve its clinical management and outcome. A major stumbling block is the absence of standardised diagnostic criteria. The different case definitions used in various studies makes comparison of research findings difficult, prevents the best use of existing data, and limits the management of disease. To address this problem, a 3-day tuberculous meningitis workshop took place in Cape Town, South Africa, and was attended by 41 international participants experienced in the research or management of tuberculous meningitis. During the meeting, diagnostic criteria were assessed and discussed, after which a writing committee was appointed to finalise a consensus case definition for tuberculous meningitis for use in future clinical research. We present the consensus case definition together with the rationale behind the recommendations. This case definition is applicable irrespective of the patient's age, HIV infection status, or the resources available in the research setting. Consistent use of the proposed case definition will aid comparison of studies, improve scientific communication, and ultimately improve care. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tuberculous meningitis

            Tuberculous menigitis (TBM) presents a major health burden around the world, especially in individuals with concomitant HIV infection, in whom mortality is nearly 50%. Here, members of the TBM International Research Consortium summarize our current understanding of TBM pathogenesis, diagnosis and management, and discuss key avenues for future research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adolescents and adults.

              Tuberculous meningitis kills or disables more than half of those affected with the disease. Previous studies have been too small to determine whether adjunctive treatment with corticosteroids can reduce the risk of disability or death among adults with tuberculous meningitis, and the effect of coinfection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is unclear. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Vietnam in patients over 14 years of age who had tuberculous meningitis, with or without HIV infection, to determine whether adjunctive treatment with dexamethasone reduced the risk of death or severe disability after nine months of follow-up. We conducted prespecified subgroup analyses and intention-to-treat analyses. A total of 545 patients were randomly assigned to groups that received either dexamethasone (274 patients) or placebo (271 patients). Only 10 patients (1.8 percent) had been lost to follow-up at nine months of treatment. Treatment with dexamethasone was associated with a reduced risk of death (relative risk, 0.69; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.92; P=0.01). It was not associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of severely disabled patients (34 of 187 patients [18.2 percent] among survivors in the dexamethasone group vs. 22 of 159 patients [13.8 percent] in the placebo group, P=0.27) or in the proportion of patients who had either died or were severely disabled after nine months (odds ratio, 0.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.13; P=0.22). The treatment effect was consistent across subgroups that were defined by disease-severity grade (stratified relative risk of death, 0.68; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.91; P=0.007) and by HIV status (stratified relative risk of death, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.04; P=0.08). Significantly fewer serious adverse events occurred in the dexamethasone group than in the placebo group (26 of 274 patients vs. 45 of 271 patients, P=0.02). Adjunctive treatment with dexamethasone improves survival in patients over 14 years of age with tuberculous meningitis but probably does not prevent severe disability. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft Preparation
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Project Administration
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                25 August 2020
                2019
                : 4
                : 190
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, 4091, South Africa
                [2 ]Infectious Diseases Institute, Mulago College of Health Sciences, Kampala, PO Box 22418, Uganda
                [3 ]Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
                [4 ]MRC-UVRI, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
                [5 ]Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia
                [6 ]Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [7 ]Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [8 ]Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran/ Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, 40161, Indonesia
                [9 ]Infectious Disease Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadaran, Bandung, 40161, Indonesia
                [10 ]Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangukusumo Hospital, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
                [11 ]Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
                [12 ]Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangukusumo Hospital, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
                [13 ]Centre for the AIDS programme of research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Durban, 4041, South Africa
                [14 ]CAPRISA-MRC HIV-TB Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
                [15 ]KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4001, South Africa
                [16 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4013, South Africa
                [17 ]Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
                [18 ]Division of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
                [19 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [20 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, 40161, Indonesia
                [1 ]Centre INSERM U1219, Bordeaux Population Health, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
                [1 ]Centre for Global Health, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
                [2 ]St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
                London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
                [1 ]Centre INSERM U1219, Bordeaux Population Health, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
                London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-9610
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-532X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-7896
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4109-4192
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-9434
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-4052
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-651X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2410-5344
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-5993
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0926-710X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0093-6445
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4715-0060
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-6410
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-240X
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15565.2
                7542255
                33083560
                ae948f49-f762-4fb7-bb77-7507fa259690
                Copyright: © 2020 Marais S et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Department for International Development, UK Government
                Award ID: MR/S004963/1
                Funded by: Medical Research Council
                Award ID: MR/S004963/1
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research
                Award ID: MR/S004963/1
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 210772
                Award ID: MR/S004963/1
                This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Clinical PhD Fellowship to FVC [210772] and funding to the Joint Global Health Trials scheme [MR/S004963/1]. This trial is supported by a Medical Research Council (MRC) Joint Global Health Trials grant [MR/S004963/1]. The Joint Global Health Trials scheme is jointly funded by the UK Department for International Development, the MRC, the National Institutes for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust.
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Articles

                Comments

                Comment on this article