22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertension: A literature review comparing amlodipine and nifedipine GITS

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) constitute a diverse group of compounds but are often referred to as a single homogeneous class of drug and the clinical responses indiscriminately summarized. Even within the dihydropyridine subgroup, there are significant differences in formulations, pharmacokinetics, durations of action and their effects on blood pressure, heart rate, end organs and the sympathetic nervous system. Amlodipine and nifedipine in the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation are the most studied of the once-daily CCBs. Amlodipine has an inherently long pharma-cokinetic half-life, whereas, in contrast, nifedipine has an inherently short half-life but in the GITS formulation the sophisticated delivery system allows for once-daily dosing. This article is derived from a systematic review of the published literature in hypertensive patients. The following search terms in three main databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index) from 1990 to 2011 were utilized: amlodipine, nifedipine, sympathetic nervous system, sympathetic response, sympathetic nerve activity, noradrenaline, norepinephrine and heart rate. More than 1500 articles were then screened to derive the relevant analysis. As markers of sympathetic nervous system activation, studies of plasma norepinephrine concentrations, power spectral analysis, muscle sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine spillover were reviewed. Overall, each drug lowered blood pressure in hypertensive patients in association with only small changes in heart rate (i.e. < 1 beat/min). Plasma norepinephrine concentrations, as the most widely reported marker of sympathetic nervous system activity, showed greater increases in patients treated with amlodipine than with nifedipine GITS. The evidence indicates that both these once-daily dihydropyridine CCBs lower blood pressure effectively with minimal effects on heart rate. There are small differences between the drugs in the extent to which each activates the sympathetic nervous system with an overall non-significant trend in favour of nifedipine GITS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

          (2002)
          Antihypertensive therapy is well established to reduce hypertension-related morbidity and mortality, but the optimal first-step therapy is unknown. To determine whether treatment with a calcium channel blocker or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lowers the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) or other cardiovascular disease (CVD) events vs treatment with a diuretic. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial conducted from February 1994 through March 2002. A total of 33 357 participants aged 55 years or older with hypertension and at least 1 other CHD risk factor from 623 North American centers. Participants were randomly assigned to receive chlorthalidone, 12.5 to 25 mg/d (n = 15 255); amlodipine, 2.5 to 10 mg/d (n = 9048); or lisinopril, 10 to 40 mg/d (n = 9054) for planned follow-up of approximately 4 to 8 years. The primary outcome was combined fatal CHD or nonfatal myocardial infarction, analyzed by intent-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke, combined CHD (primary outcome, coronary revascularization, or angina with hospitalization), and combined CVD (combined CHD, stroke, treated angina without hospitalization, heart failure [HF], and peripheral arterial disease). Mean follow-up was 4.9 years. The primary outcome occurred in 2956 participants, with no difference between treatments. Compared with chlorthalidone (6-year rate, 11.5%), the relative risks (RRs) were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.90-1.07) for amlodipine (6-year rate, 11.3%) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.91-1.08) for lisinopril (6-year rate, 11.4%). Likewise, all-cause mortality did not differ between groups. Five-year systolic blood pressures were significantly higher in the amlodipine (0.8 mm Hg, P =.03) and lisinopril (2 mm Hg, P<.001) groups compared with chlorthalidone, and 5-year diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower with amlodipine (0.8 mm Hg, P<.001). For amlodipine vs chlorthalidone, secondary outcomes were similar except for a higher 6-year rate of HF with amlodipine (10.2% vs 7.7%; RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.25-1.52). For lisinopril vs chlorthalidone, lisinopril had higher 6-year rates of combined CVD (33.3% vs 30.9%; RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16); stroke (6.3% vs 5.6%; RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.30); and HF (8.7% vs 7.7%; RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.31). Thiazide-type diuretics are superior in preventing 1 or more major forms of CVD and are less expensive. They should be preferred for first-step antihypertensive therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of amlodipine and cilnidipine on cardiac sympathetic nervous system and neurohormonal status in essential hypertension.

            N-Type calcium channel antagonists may suppress sympathetic activity. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of amlodipine and cilnidipine on the cardiac sympathetic nervous system and the neurohormonal status of essential hypertension. 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) cardiac imaging was performed and blood samples were taken to determine plasma renin activity and plasma norepinephrine concentration before and 3 months after drug administration in 47 patients with mild essential hypertension. Twenty-four of the patients were treated with 5 to 10 mg/d of amlodipine; the other 23 were treated with 10 to 20 mg/d of cilnidipine. For comparison, 12 normotensive subjects were also studied. No significant differences were found in the basal characteristics between the 2 hypertensive groups. In both hypertensive groups, both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced to similar levels 3 months after drug treatment. Before the drug treatment, the 2 hypertensive groups had a significantly higher washout rate and lower heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratio compared with the normotensive subjects. The H/M ratio significantly increased (P<0.05) in combination with a decreased washout rate (P<0.02) after drug treatment in the cilnidipine group. In the amlodipine group, a significant decrease in washout rate (P<0. 04) was noted, without an increase in the H/M ratio. However, no significant changes were found in plasma renin activity and plasma norepinephrine concentration in either group. Thus, in patients with essential hypertension, cilnidipine suppressed cardiac sympathetic overactivity and amlodipine had a little suppressive effect. Cilnidipine may provide a new strategy for treatment of cardiovascular diseases with sympathetic overactivity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Corcoran Lecture. Sympathetic hyperactivity and coronary risk in hypertension.

              S Julius (1993)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Blood Press
                Blood Press
                sblo
                Blood Pressure
                Informa Healthcare
                0803-7051
                1651-1999
                July 2012
                05 July 2012
                : 21
                : Suppl 1
                : 3-10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [2 ]University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [3 ]University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Corey B. Toal, Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, 1 Kings College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Tel: 416–209–0923. E-mail: SLIDES@ 123456bell.net
                Article
                10.3109/08037051.2012.690615
                3469239
                21991999
                aea69801-a9b2-4ecd-b5cd-a2126929c8b7
                © 2012 Informa Healthcare

                This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Informa Healthcare journals , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 January 2012
                : 29 April 2012
                Categories
                Original Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                sympathetic activation,norepinephrine,sympathetic nerve activity,extended release,blood pressure,gits,amlodipine,nifedipine,catecholamines

                Comments

                Comment on this article