Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Peptide-Containing Nerves in the Rat Femoral Artery and Vein

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Peptide-containing nerves have been examined in the rat femoral artery and vein using immunocytochemical and vasomotor techniques. The general neuronal marker PGP 9.5 revealed a moderate supply of nerve fibres and fascicles forming a loose network in the adventitia and the adventitial-medial border of the artery and vein. The majority of the nerve fibres in both the artery and vein displayed immunoreactivity for neuropeptide Y (NPY) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). The distribution pattern and number of these two types correlated well. The artery had a slightly richer PGP 9.5- immunoreactive nerve supply compared to the vein, but the nerve plexus in the vein displayed a more uniform arrangement. In contrast, relatively few nerve fibres displayed calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, or vasoactive intestinal peptide immunoreactivity in either the artery or vein. The calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive fibres had a similar distribution to that of the substance P containing fibres. Using a sensitive in vitro method the vasomotor responses to perivascular peptides were characterized. In the femoral artery NPY potentiated α<sub>1</sub>-adrenoceptor mediated contractions, and had very little effect by itself. In contrast, 10<sup>–7</sup> M NPY contracted femoral veins by up to 68% relative to 60 mM potassium induced conctraction, and there was no potentiation of α-adrenoceptor mediated contractions. Acetylcholine, peptide histidine isoleucine, vasoactive intestinal peptide, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide, all relaxed the contracted femoral artery and vein. Regarding the putative parasympathetic neurotransmitters, acetylcholine caused stronger relaxation of veins as compared to arteries whereas for vasoactive intestinal peptide and peptide histidine isoleucine the relaxations were stronger in the arterial preparation. These three agonists were more potent in the femoral vein. Substance P was more potent on the femoral vein, having the same maximum response in both preparations. On the other hand, the response induced by CGRP was some three times greater in the venous than in the arterial preparation. These data reveal that although there appear to be only minor differences in the peptidergic innervation of the rat femoral artery and vein pronounced differences occur in the peptide effector responses. The data support the concept that perivascular peptides play different roles in regulating various parts of the circulation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JVR
          J Vasc Res
          10.1159/issn.1018-1172
          Journal of Vascular Research
          S. Karger AG
          1018-1172
          1423-0135
          1989
          1989
          23 September 2008
          : 26
          : 5
          : 254-271
          Affiliations
          aDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Lund, Sweden; bDepartment of Cell Biology, Gulbenkian Institute of Science, Oeiras, Portugal; cDepartment of Histochemistry, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, UK
          Article
          158775 Blood Vessels 1989;26:254–271
          10.1159/000158775
          © 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 18
          Categories
          Research Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article