16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Brain tumour detection and diagnosis requires clinicians to inspect and analyse brain magnetic resonance images. Eye-tracking is commonly used to examine observers’ gaze behaviour during such medical image interpretation tasks, but analysis of eye movement sequences is limited. We therefore used ScanMatch, a novel technique that compares saccadic eye movement sequences, to examine the effect of expertise and diagnosis on the similarity of scanning patterns. Diagnostic accuracy was also recorded. Thirty-five participants were classified as Novices, Medics and Experts based on their level of expertise. Participants completed two brain tumour detection tasks. The first was a whole-brain task, which consisted of 60 consecutively presented slices from one patient; the second was an independent-slice detection task, which consisted of 32 independent slices from five different patients. Experts displayed the highest accuracy and sensitivity followed by Medics and then Novices in the independent-slice task. Experts showed the highest level of scanning pattern similarity, with medics engaging in the least similar scanning patterns, for both the whole-brain and independent-slice task. In the independent-slice task, scanning patterns were the least similar for false negatives across all expertise levels and most similar for experts when they responded correctly. These results demonstrate the value of using ScanMatch in the medical image perception literature. Future research adopting this tool could, for example, identify cases that yield low scanning similarity and so provide insight into why diagnostic errors occur and ultimately help in training radiologists.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways.

              How does one find objects in scenes? For decades, visual search models have been built on experiments in which observers search for targets, presented among distractor items, isolated and randomly arranged on blank backgrounds. Are these models relevant to search in continuous scenes? This article argues that the mechanisms that govern artificial, laboratory search tasks do play a role in visual search in scenes. However, scene-based information is used to guide search in ways that had no place in earlier models. Search in scenes might be best explained by a dual-path model: a 'selective' path in which candidate objects must be individually selected for recognition and a 'nonselective' path in which information can be extracted from global and/or statistical information. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44117 9546614 , emily.crowe@bristol.ac.uk
                i.d.gilchrist@bristol.ac.uk
                c.kent@bristol.ac.uk
                Journal
                Cogn Res Princ Implic
                Cogn Res Princ Implic
                Cognitive Research
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2365-7464
                25 April 2018
                25 April 2018
                2018
                : 3
                : 1
                : 12
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7603, GRID grid.5337.2, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, ; 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU UK
                Article
                97
                10.1186/s41235-018-0097-4
                5915515
                aecf8185-21ab-4bda-b236-613f7bd6621c
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 23 June 2017
                : 15 March 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council;
                Award ID: EP/M000885/1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                brain tumour detection,eye-tracking,scanmatch,expertise,magnetic resonance imaging,medical image perception

                Comments

                Comment on this article