22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Histopathologic Slides

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This prognostic study evaluates the performance and generalizability of a deep neural network trained on data from a single institution for classification of colorectal polyps on histopathologic slide images.

          Key Points

          Question

          Are deep neural networks trained on data from a single institution for classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides generalizable across multiple external institutions?

          Findings

          In this prognostic study of a deep neural network to classify the 4 most common polyp types on digitized histopathologic slides from a single institution (internal test set) and 24 US institutions (external test set), the mean accuracy was 93.5% on the internal test set and 87.0% on the external test set.

          Meaning

          Deep neural networks may provide a generalizable approach for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Histologic classification of colorectal polyps plays a critical role in screening for colorectal cancer and care of affected patients. An accurate and automated algorithm for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides could benefit practitioners and patients.

          Objective

          To evaluate the performance and generalizability of a deep neural network for colorectal polyp classification on histopathologic slide images using a multi-institutional data set.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prognostic study used histopathologic slides collected from January 1, 2016, to June 31, 2016, from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, with 326 slides used for training, 157 slides for an internal data set, and 25 for a validation set. For the external data set, 238 slides for 179 distinct patients were obtained from 24 institutions across 13 US states. Data analysis was performed from April 9 to November 23, 2019.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model to classify 4 major colorectal polyp types: tubular adenoma, tubulovillous or villous adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, and sessile serrated adenoma. Performance was compared with that of local pathologists’ at the point of care identified from corresponding pathology laboratories.

          Results

          For the internal evaluation on the 157 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network had a mean accuracy of 93.5% (95% CI, 89.6%-97.4%) compared with local pathologists’ accuracy of 91.4% (95% CI, 87.0%-95.8%). On the external test set of 238 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network achieved an accuracy of 87.0% (95% CI, 82.7%-91.3%), which was comparable with local pathologists’ accuracy of 86.6% (95% CI, 82.3%-90.9%).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The findings suggest that this model may assist pathologists by improving the diagnostic efficiency, reproducibility, and accuracy of colorectal cancer screenings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Classification and mutation prediction from non–small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning

          Visual inspection of histopathology slides is one of the main methods used by pathologists to assess the stage, type and subtype of lung tumors. Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are the most prevalent subtypes of lung cancer, and their distinction requires visual inspection by an experienced pathologist. In this study, we trained a deep convolutional neural network (inception v3) on whole-slide images obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas to accurately and automatically classify them into LUAD, LUSC or normal lung tissue. The performance of our method is comparable to that of pathologists, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. Our model was validated on independent datasets of frozen tissues, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues and biopsies. Furthermore, we trained the network to predict the ten most commonly mutated genes in LUAD. We found that six of them-STK11, EGFR, FAT1, SETBP1, KRAS and TP53-can be predicted from pathology images, with AUCs from 0.733 to 0.856 as measured on a held-out population. These findings suggest that deep-learning models can assist pathologists in the detection of cancer subtype or gene mutations. Our approach can be applied to any cancer type, and the code is available at https://github.com/ncoudray/DeepPATH .
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network

            Computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation plays a critical role in the clinical ECG workflow1. Widely available digital ECG data and the algorithmic paradigm of deep learning2 present an opportunity to substantially improve the accuracy and scalability of automated ECG analysis. However, a comprehensive evaluation of an end-to-end deep learning approach for ECG analysis across a wide variety of diagnostic classes has not been previously reported. Here, we develop a deep neural network (DNN) to classify 12 rhythm classes using 91,232 single-lead ECGs from 53,549 patients who used a single-lead ambulatory ECG monitoring device. When validated against an independent test dataset annotated by a consensus committee of board-certified practicing cardiologists, the DNN achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of 0.97. The average F1 score, which is the harmonic mean of the positive predictive value and sensitivity, for the DNN (0.837) exceeded that of average cardiologists (0.780). With specificity fixed at the average specificity achieved by cardiologists, the sensitivity of the DNN exceeded the average cardiologist sensitivity for all rhythm classes. These findings demonstrate that an end-to-end deep learning approach can classify a broad range of distinct arrhythmias from single-lead ECGs with high diagnostic performance similar to that of cardiologists. If confirmed in clinical settings, this approach could reduce the rate of misdiagnosed computerized ECG interpretations and improve the efficiency of expert human ECG interpretation by accurately triaging or prioritizing the most urgent conditions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnosis of thyroid cancer using deep convolutional neural network models applied to sonographic images: a retrospective, multicohort, diagnostic study

              The incidence of thyroid cancer is rising steadily because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment conferred by widespread use of sensitive imaging techniques for screening. This overall incidence growth is especially driven by increased diagnosis of indolent and well-differentiated papillary subtype and early-stage thyroid cancer, whereas the incidence of advanced-stage thyroid cancer has increased marginally. Thyroid ultrasound is frequently used to diagnose thyroid cancer. The aim of this study was to use deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) models to improve the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid cancer by analysing sonographic imaging data from clinical ultrasounds.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                23 April 2020
                April 2020
                23 April 2020
                : 3
                : 4
                : e203398
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
                [2 ]Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
                [3 ]Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
                [4 ]Minnesota Gastroenterology PA, Minneapolis
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, Fairview Southdale Hospital, Edina, Minnesota
                [6 ]Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
                [7 ]Department of Epidemiology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 19, 2020.
                Published: April 23, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3398
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Wei JW et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Saeed Hassanpour, PhD, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Dr, HB 7261, Lebanon, NH 03756 ( Saeed.Hassanpour@ 123456dartmouth.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Hassanpour and Mr Wei had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Wei, Suriawinata, Tomita, Abdollahi, Hassanpour.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Wei, Suriawinata, Vaickus, Ren, Liu, Lisovsky, Kim, Snover, Baron, Barry, Hassanpour.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Wei, Tomita, Abdollahi, Hassanpour.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Wei, Suriawinata, Vaickus, Ren, Liu, Lisovsky, Kim, Snover, Baron, Barry, Hassanpour.
                Statistical analysis: Wei, Hassanpour.
                Obtained funding: Barry, Hassanpour.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Suriawinata, Ren, Tomita, Abdollahi, Barry, Hassanpour.
                Supervision: Suriawinata, Vaickus, Hassanpour.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Suriawinata reported receiving grants from the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Ren reported grants from NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Snover reported receiving personal fees from Dartmouth Medical Center during the conduct of the study. Dr Baron reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute, NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Barry reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute, NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Hassanpour reported having a patent to Attention-Based Classification of High Resolution Microscopy Images pending and receiving grants from NIH during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by grants R01CA098286 (Dr Baron), R01LM012837 (Dr Hassanpour), and P20GM104416 (Dr Hassanpour) from the NIH, the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, and the Norris Cotton Cancer Center.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: Thomas H. Cormen, PhD, and Lamar Moss, BA, Dartmouth College, provided feedback on this article; Leila Mott, MS, Dartmouth College, helped with the data set; and Minnesota Gastroenterology helped with data collection. These individuals were not compensated for their contribution.
                Article
                zoi200163
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3398
                7180424
                32324237
                aed082bb-5cb5-483c-835f-0127848c7478
                Copyright 2020 Wei JW et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 23 November 2019
                : 19 February 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Informatics

                Comments

                Comment on this article