16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Commentary

      article-commentary

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel (CT). Specific symptoms may be classified as early (tingling, numbness, paresthesia and burning pain), late intermediate (atrophy of thenar muscles and loss of ability to grasp and pinch) and advanced symptoms (dry, cold and discolored skin with possible ulceration of the thumb, index and middle fingers due to vasomotor changes).[1] Median nerve motor weakness and sensory loss are likely due to compression of large diameter fibers. The majority of patients complain for nocturnal pain and paresthesia probably due to the small fibers and autonomic involvement on a vascular basis.[1] Diagnosis is based on clinical history, physical examination, and nerve conduction velocity (NCV). The gold standard test is nerve conduction studies (NCS) as Gupta and co-authors pointed out.[2] The NCS measure the sensory and motor fibers conduction velocity in the median nerve at the wrist. Gupta et al.[2] mentioned that the sensory component is affected earlier than the motor one and in early stages of CTS there is usually a delay in sensory NCV. Electrodiagnostic markers determine which parameters are the best predictors of spontaneous electromyographic activity.[2 3] Both conservative and surgical interventions are used to manage CTS, though there is no universally accepted therapy. The conservative management consists of splinting, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and local steroid injections (LSI) into CT. The best treatment response is observed after LSI, in patients who had no significant muscle atrophy or weakness and had symptoms for less than a year.[4] In CTS, irrespectively of grade, LSI can be used for a short period (1-3 months) before surgery decompression, in order to improve local ischemia and reduce synovial swelling or vascular congestion.[5] Especially in athletes with local muscular and tendinous inflammatory conditions, the injection of local glucocorticosteroids relieves symptoms and results in speedier return to athletic activity.[6] Although LSI into CT is safe and easy intervention reducing symptoms significantly, carries a low risk of nerve damage. Alternatively, another site proximal to CT[7] is used for LSI with beneficial effects. The injection is performed ulnar to the tendon of the flexor carpi radialis, 4 cm proximal to the first crease of the wrist. Repeated NCV measurements after injection showed improvement in most of the electrophysiologic parameters. The injection distal to the wrist crease between the hypothenar and thenar prominences is used with comparable favourable clinical effects and relief of numbness.[5] Surgery is the treatment of choice in severe CTS, since ineffective therapy within 2 to 7 weeks can result in partial paralysis of the thumb and permanent loss of sensation. The hand surgeon must ensure that the patients have all the signs and symptoms and all the indications for division of the flexor retinaculum.[1] Surgery is effective with a long-term success rate greater than 75%.[8] Permanent complications may occur due to neural variations arising ulnar of the median nerve and could result in iatrogenic injury during endoscopic or open surgery.[9] Injury to the palmar cutaneous and recurrent motor branches of the median nerve, hypertrophic scarring, tendons adhesions, infection, hematoma formation, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy may occur in less than 1%.[10] The endoscopic surgical release of the transverse ligament remains controversial due to the risk of injury of the common digital nerve and the main trunk of the median nerve. In conclusion, the study of Gupta et al.[2] emphasizes in the LSI as a conservative treatment for mild CTS or additional treatment after CT surgical decompression. Distal motor latency is the best parameter for follow-up after LSI in CTS. Futures studies are needed to increase the follow-up of patients among different populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Carpal tunnel syndrome.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Carpal-tunnel syndrome. Results of a prospective trial of steroid injection and splinting.

            In order to define the role of steroid injection and splinting as a method of treatment of carpal-tunnel syndrome, a prospective study was performed on fifty hands in forty-one consecutive patients. All hands were treated with a single injection and three weeks of splinting. Follow-up ranged from a minimum of six months to a maximum of twenty-six months, with a mean of eighteen months. All hands had characteristic symptoms of median-nerve compression at the wrist and increased distal median motor latencies. Eleven (22 percent) of fifty hands were completely free of symptoms at the end of the follow-up period. Hands that initially had mild symptoms and findings of less than one year's duration, normal sensibility, normal thenar strength and mass, and one to two-millisecond prolongations of either distal median motor or sensory latencies had the most satisfactory responses to injections and splinting. Hands with severe symptoms of more than one year's duration and findings of atrophy, weakness, and distal motor latencies of more than six milliseconds or absent sensory responses had the poorest response to injections and experienced a high rate of relapse.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Injection with methylprednisolone proximal to the carpal tunnel: randomised double blind trial.

              To assess the effect of a 40 mg methylprednisolone injection proximal to the carpal tunnel in patients with the carpal tunnel syndrome. Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Outpatient neurology clinic in a district general hospital. Patients with symptoms of the carpal tunnel syndrome for more than 3 months, confirmed by electrophysiological tests and aged over 18 years. Injection with 10 mg lignocaine (lidocaine) or 10 mg lignocaine and 40 mg methylprednisolone. Non-responders who had received lignocaine received 40 mg methylprednisolone and 10 mg lignocaine and were followed in an open study. Participants were scored as having improved or not improved. Improved was defined as no symptoms or minor symptoms requiring no further treatment. At 1 month 6 (20%) of 30 patients in the control group had improved compared with 23 (77%) of 30 patients the intervention group (difference 57% (95% confidence interval 36% to 77%)). After 1 year, 2 of 6 improved patients in the control group did not need a second treatment, compared with 15 of 23 improved patients in the intervention group (difference 43% (23% to 63%). Of the 28 non-responders in the control group, 24 (86%) improved after methylprednisolone. Of these 24 patients, 12 needed surgical treatment within one year. A single injection with steroids close to the carpal tunnel may result in long term improvement and should be considered before surgical decompression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Neurosci Rural Pract
                J Neurosci Rural Pract
                JNRP
                Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0976-3147
                0976-3155
                Oct-Dec 2013
                : 4
                : 4
                : 397-398
                Affiliations
                [1] Department of Anatomy, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Maria Piagkou, Department of Anatomy, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, M. Asias 75, 11527, Athens, Greece. E-mail: mapian@ 123456med.uoa.gr
                Article
                JNRP-4-397
                3858756
                aee9e59f-add8-4306-9588-4a424a136285
                Copyright: © Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Commentary

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article