7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors for intimate partner violence and abuse among adolescents and young adults: findings from a UK population-based cohort

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Approximately one-third of young people in the UK have suffered intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) on reaching adulthood. We need interventions to prevent IPVA in this population, but there is a lack of evidence on who is at greatest risk.

          Methods: We analysed questionnaire data from 3,279 participants of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children population-based birth cohort. We estimated the prevalence of IPVA victimisation and perpetration by age 21, by sex, demographic, parenting, mental health, externalising behaviour (e.g. smoking), educational, employment, and adverse childhood factors.

          Results: Overall, 29% of males and 41% of females reported IPVA victimisation, with 20% and 25% reporting perpetration, respectively (16% and 22% both). The most common type of IPVA was emotional, followed by physical, then sexual. History of anxiety, self-harm, anti-social behaviour, cannabis or illicit (non-cannabis) drug use, or risky sexual behaviour among males and females were associated with a 50% increase in likelihood of IPVA (victimisation or perpetration). Males reporting depression, sexual abuse (not by an intimate partner), witnessing domestic violence, or parental separation were also more likely to experience IPVA. Extreme parental monitoring, high academic achievement during adolescence, and NEET (not being in education, employment, or training) status in young adulthood were associated with reduced risks of IPVA.

          Conclusions: A range of demographic, mental health, and behavioural factors were associated with increased prevalence of IPVA victimisation or perpetration. Further study of likely complex pathways from these factors to IPVA, to inform primary prevention, is needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

          The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Cohort Profile: The ‘Children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

            The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a transgenerational prospective observational study investigating influences on health and development across the life course. It considers multiple genetic, epigenetic, biological, psychological, social and other environmental exposures in relation to a similarly diverse range of health, social and developmental outcomes. Recruitment sought to enrol pregnant women in the Bristol area of the UK during 1990–92; this was extended to include additional children eligible using the original enrolment definition up to the age of 18 years. The children from 14 541 pregnancies were recruited in 1990–92, increasing to 15 247 pregnancies by the age of 18 years. This cohort profile describes the index children of these pregnancies. Follow-up includes 59 questionnaires (4 weeks–18 years of age) and 9 clinical assessment visits (7–17 years of age). The resource comprises a wide range of phenotypic and environmental measures in addition to biological samples, genetic (DNA on 11 343 children, genome-wide data on 8365 children, complete genome sequencing on 2000 children) and epigenetic (methylation sampling on 1000 children) information and linkage to health and administrative records. Data access is described in this article and is currently set up as a supported access resource. To date, over 700 peer-reviewed articles have been published using ALSPAC data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cohort Profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort

              Summary The Avon Longitudinal Study of Children and Parents (ALSPAC) was established to understand how genetic and environmental characteristics influence health and development in parents and children. All pregnant women resident in a defined area in the South West of England, with an expected date of delivery between 1st April 1991 and 31st December 1992, were eligible and 13 761 women (contributing 13 867 pregnancies) were recruited. These women have been followed over the last 19–22 years and have completed up to 20 questionnaires, have had detailed data abstracted from their medical records and have information on any cancer diagnoses and deaths through record linkage. A follow-up assessment was completed 17–18 years postnatal at which anthropometry, blood pressure, fat, lean and bone mass and carotid intima media thickness were assessed, and a fasting blood sample taken. The second follow-up clinic, which additionally measures cognitive function, physical capability, physical activity (with accelerometer) and wrist bone architecture, is underway and two further assessments with similar measurements will take place over the next 5 years. There is a detailed biobank that includes DNA, with genome-wide data available on >10 000, stored serum and plasma taken repeatedly since pregnancy and other samples; a wide range of data on completed biospecimen assays are available. Details of how to access these data are provided in this cohort profile.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                21 January 2021
                2020
                : 5
                : 176
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [2 ]MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [3 ]University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
                [4 ]Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [1 ]Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
                [1 ]Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
                University of Bristol, UK
                [1 ]Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                University of Bristol, UK
                University of Bristol, UK
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: We have none to declare.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-1408
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-5644
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0504-497X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-2796
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-3926
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-9470
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16106.3
                7848855
                33553678
                aefc45b2-149f-4114-8a9e-33a3257ed4f5
                Copyright: © 2021 Herbert A et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 January 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council
                Award ID: MC_UU_12013/2
                Award ID: MR/S002634/1
                Award ID: MR/M009351/1
                Award ID: MR/M020894/1
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 217065
                Funded by: University of Bristol
                The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 217065) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors and will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). This work was supported by a Medical Research Council grant [MR/S002634/1]. AF and LDH are funded by MRC personal fellowships (MR/M009351/1, MR/M020894/1). AH, JH, LDH, and AF work in a unit that receives funding from the University of Bristol and the UK Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/2].
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                alspac,intimate partner violence,dating violence,adolescent,young adult,cohort studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article