2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Performance of Medtronic Hybrid Closed-Loop Iterations: Results from a Randomized Trial in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigates the performance of an iteration of the Medtronic hybrid closed-loop (HCL) algorithm, which utilizes sensor glucose values non-adjunctively for bolus advice, recognizes sustained hyperglycemia, suggests insulin bolus correction, and includes more accommodative SmartGuard™ automode parameters that aim to improve function and usability. Adolescents aged 13-17 years with type 1 diabetes >1 year, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0%-10%, currently using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion were randomized to the control Medtronic standard HCL algorithm or to the intervention Medtronic HCL with enhancements. Participants attended a 7-day and 7-night nonstructured camp setting. Twelve participants (mean age 15 years, seven males, five females, mean HbA1c 8.55%) completed the study. For the control group, time in target glucose sensor range (3.9-10 mmol/L) was 63.68% ± 10.74% at baseline and changed to 75.85% ± 8.49% during the study (relative Δ19%). Time spent in <2.8 mmol/L was 0.61% ± 0.79% at baseline for the control group and changed to 0.32% ± 0.31% during the study for the control group (relative Δ48%). In the intervention group, time in target glucose sensor range (3.9-10 mmol/L) was 52.15% ± 9.55% at baseline and changed to 74.32% ± 8.41% during the study (relative Δ42%). Time spent in <2.8 mmol/L was 1.07% ± 1.77% at baseline for the intervention group and changed to 0.24% ± 0.14% during the study for the intervention group (relative Δ78%). Mean sensor glucose was 8.05 ± 0.73 mmol/L and 8.22 ± 0.56 mmol/L for the control and intervention participants. SmartGuard automode exit frequency was 0.54 exits per person per day for control and 0.12 exits per person per day for the intervention. Participants were in active SmartGuard automode 97.1% and 98.8% of the time for the control and intervention, respectively. Alarm frequency was 2.1 alarms per person per day for the control arm, and 0.26 alarms per person per day in the intervention arm. Feasibility of the enhanced HCL algorithm was demonstrated with a high proportion of time spent in SmartGuard automode and target glucose range. The iterative changes resulted in less SmartGuard automode exits without compromising glycemic control.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Diabetes Technol. Ther.
          Diabetes technology & therapeutics
          Mary Ann Liebert Inc
          1557-8593
          1520-9156
          October 2018
          : 20
          : 10
          Affiliations
          [1 ] 1 Department of Endocrinology of Diabetes, Perth Children's Hospital , Nedlands, Australia .
          [2 ] 2 Children's Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute , Perth, Western Australia .
          [3 ] 3 Division of Paediatrics, Within the Medical School, The University of Western Australia , Perth, Australia .
          Article
          10.1089/dia.2018.0161
          30204486
          af044f72-b068-4225-af7e-d94f19e5d242
          History

          Type 1 diabetes,Closed loop,Pediatrics.
          Type 1 diabetes, Closed loop, Pediatrics.

          Comments

          Comment on this article