24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic development and implementation of interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The need for healthcare strengthening to enhance equity is critical, requiring systematic approaches that focus on those experiencing lesser access and outcomes. This project developed and tested the Ophelia (OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access) approach for co-design of interventions to improve health literacy and equity of access. Eight principles guided this development: Outcomes focused; Equity driven, Needs diagnosis, Co-design, Driven by local wisdom, Sustainable, Responsive and Systematically applied. We report the application of the Ophelia process where proof-of-concept was defined as successful application of the principles.

          Methods

          Nine sites were briefed on the aims of the project around health literacy, co-design and quality improvement. The sites were rural/metropolitan, small/large hospitals, community health centres or municipalities. Each site identified their own priorities for improvement; collected health literacy data using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) within the identified priority groups; engaged staff in co-design workshops to generate ideas for improvement; developed program-logic models; and implemented their projects using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Evaluation included assessment of impacts on organisations, practitioners and service users, and whether the principles were applied.

          Results

          Sites undertook co-design workshops involving discussion of service user needs informed by HLQ ( n = 813) and interview data. Sites generated between 21 and 78 intervention ideas and then planned their selected interventions through program-logic models. Sites successfully implemented interventions and refined them progressively with PDSA cycles. Interventions generally involved one of four pathways: development of clinician skills and resources for health literacy, engagement of community volunteers to disseminate health promotion messages, direct impact on consumers’ health literacy, and redesign of existing services. Evidence of application of the principles was found in all sites.

          Conclusions

          The Ophelia approach guided identification of health literacy issues at each participating site and the development and implementation of locally appropriate solutions. The eight principles provided a framework that allowed flexible application of the Ophelia approach and generation of a diverse set of interventions. Changes were observed at organisational, staff, and community member levels. The Ophelia approach can be used to generate health service improvements that enhance health outcomes and address inequity of access to healthcare.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4147-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Regional alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality in Great Britain: novel insights using retail sales data

          Background Regional differences in population levels of alcohol-related harm exist across Great Britain, but these are not entirely consistent with differences in population levels of alcohol consumption. This incongruence may be due to the use of self-report surveys to estimate consumption. Survey data are subject to various biases and typically produce consumption estimates much lower than those based on objective alcohol sales data. However, sales data have never been used to estimate regional consumption within Great Britain (GB). This ecological study uses alcohol retail sales data to provide novel insights into regional alcohol consumption in GB, and to explore the relationship between alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality. Methods Alcohol sales estimates derived from electronic sales, delivery records and retail outlet sampling were obtained. The volume of pure alcohol sold was used to estimate per adult consumption, by market sector and drink type, across eleven GB regions in 2010–11. Alcohol-related mortality rates were calculated for the same regions and a cross-sectional correlation analysis between consumption and mortality was performed. Results Per adult consumption in northern England was above the GB average and characterised by high beer sales. A high level of consumption in South West England was driven by on-trade sales of cider and spirits and off-trade wine sales. Scottish regions had substantially higher spirits sales than elsewhere in GB, particularly through the off-trade. London had the lowest per adult consumption, attributable to lower off-trade sales across most drink types. Alcohol-related mortality was generally higher in regions with higher per adult consumption. The relationship was weakened by the South West and Central Scotland regions, which had the highest consumption levels, but discordantly low and very high alcohol-related mortality rates, respectively. Conclusions This study provides support for the ecological relationship between alcohol-related mortality and alcohol consumption. The synthesis of knowledge from a combination of sales, survey and mortality data, as well as primary research studies, is key to ensuring that regional alcohol consumption, and its relationship with alcohol-related harms, is better understood.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Accelerating health equity: the key role of universal health coverage in the Sustainable Development Goals

            The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to be committed to by Heads of State at the upcoming 2015 United Nations General Assembly, have set much higher and more ambitious health-related goals and targets than did the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The main challenge among MDG off-track countries is the failure to provide and sustain financial access to quality services by communities, especially the poor. Universal health coverage (UHC), one of the SDG health targets indispensable to achieving an improved level and distribution of health, requires a significant increase in government investment in strengthening primary healthcare - the close-to-client service which can result in equitable access. Given the trend of increased fiscal capacity in most developing countries, aiming at long-term progress toward UHC is feasible, if there is political commitment and if focused, effective policies are in place. Trends in high income countries, including an aging population which increases demand for health workers, continue to trigger international migration of health personnel from low and middle income countries. The inspirational SDGs must be matched with redoubled government efforts to strengthen health delivery systems, produce and retain more and relevant health workers, and progressively realize UHC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Sustained improvements in students’ mental health literacy with use of a mental health curriculum in Canadian schools

              Background Enhancement of mental health literacy for youth is a focus of increasing interest for mental health professionals and educators alike. Schools are an ideal site for addressing mental health literacy in young people. Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the impact of curriculum-based interventions within high school settings. We examined the effect of a high-school mental health curriculum (The Guide) in enhancing mental health literacy in Canadian schools. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis on surveys of students who participated in a classroom mental health course taught by their usual teachers. Evaluation of students’ mental health literacy (knowledge/attitudes) was completed before and after classroom implementation and at 2-month follow-up. We used paired-samples t-tests and Cohen’s d value to determine the significance and impact of change. Results There were 265 students who completed all surveys. Students’ knowledge significantly improved between pre- and post-tests (p < 0.001; d = 0.90) and was maintained at follow-up (p < 0.001; d = 0.73). Similarly, attitude significantly improved between pre- and post-tests (p < 0.001; d = 0.25) and was significantly higher at follow-up than base-line (p < 0.007; d = 0.18) Conclusions The Guide, applied by usual teachers in usual classroom curriculum, may help improve student knowledge and attitudes regarding mental health. This is the first study to demonstrate the positive impact of a curriculum-based mental health literacy program in a Canadian high school population. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-014-0379-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alison.beauchamp@deakin.edu.au
                roy.batterham@deakin.edu.au
                sdodson@hollows.org
                brad.astbury@unimelb.edu.au
                gerald.elsworth@deakin.edu.au
                crystal.mcphee@deakin.edu.au
                Jeanine.Jacobson@dhss.vic.gov.au
                rachelle.buchbinder@monash.edu.au
                richard.osborne@deakin.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                3 March 2017
                3 March 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 230
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, GRID grid.1021.2, Health Systems Improvement Unit, Centre for Population Health, , Deakin University, ; Geelong, VIC Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7857, GRID grid.1002.3, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, , Monash University, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [3 ]Fred Hollows Foundation, Carlton, VIC Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, GRID grid.1008.9, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, , University of Melbourne, ; Parkville, VIC Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.453680.c, , Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0430 5514, GRID grid.440111.1, Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, , Cabrini Hospital, ; Malvern, VIC Australia
                Article
                4147
                10.1186/s12889-017-4147-5
                5335493
                28253883
                af480bab-d38c-4474-b0ef-97286411212d
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 5 November 2016
                : 24 February 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923, Australian Research Council;
                Award ID: LP120200111
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Public health
                health literacy,health inequities,ophelia,chronic disease,health literacy questionnaire,hlq,health service improvement,healthcare access

                Comments

                Comment on this article