11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Controversies with self-emulsifying drug delivery system from pharmacokinetic point of view

      , , , ,
      Drug Delivery
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nano-emulsions and micro-emulsions: clarifications of the critical differences.

          Much research has been done over the past years on self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, their main interest being the simplicity of the formulation processes, the great stability of the systems and their high potential in pharmaceutical applications and industrial scaling-up. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems are generally described in the literature indiscriminately as either nano-emulsions or micro-emulsions. Although this misconception appears to be common, these two systems are fundamentally different, based on very different physical and physicochemical concepts. Their differences result in very different stability behaviors, which can have significant consequences regarding their applications and administration as nanomedicines. This paper aims at clarifying the problem, first by reviewing all the physical and physicochemical fundamentals regarding these two systems, using a quantitative thermodynamic approach for micro-emulsions. Following these clarifications, we show how the confusion between nano-emulsions and micro-emulsions appears in the literature and how most of the micro-emulsion systems referred to are actually nano-emulsion systems. Finally, we illustrate how to clear up this misconception using simple experiments. Since this confusion is well established in the literature, such clarifications seem necessary in order to improve the understanding of research in this important field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Formulation of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lipid-based delivery systems and intestinal lymphatic drug transport: A mechanistic update ☆

              After oral administration, the majority of drug molecules are absorbed across the small intestine and enter the systemic circulation via the portal vein and the liver. For some highly lipophilic drugs (typically log P > 5, lipid solubility > 50 mg/g), however, association with lymph lipoproteins in the enterocyte leads to transport to the systemic circulation via the intestinal lymph. The attendant delivery benefits associated with lymphatic drug transport include a reduction in first-pass metabolism and lymphatic exposure to drug concentrations orders of magnitude higher than that attained in systemic blood. In the current review we briefly describe the mechanisms by which drug molecules access the lymph and the formulation strategies that may be utilised to enhance lymphatic drug transport. Specific focus is directed toward recent advances in understanding regarding the impact of lipid source (both endogenous and exogenous) and intracellular lipid trafficking pathways on lymphatic drug transport and enterocyte-based first-pass metabolism.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Delivery
                Drug Delivery
                Informa UK Limited
                1071-7544
                1521-0464
                July 22 2016
                November 21 2016
                August 15 2016
                November 21 2016
                : 23
                : 9
                : 3639-3652
                Article
                10.1080/10717544.2016.1214990
                27685505
                af4cb795-c0a5-4b27-903a-3609927692fb
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article