40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Controversial Issues in Gastroenterology

      Submit here by October 31, 2025

      About Digestion: 3.0 Impact Factor I 7.9 CiteScore I 0.891 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Quality of Life in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Prospective Study in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aims: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) can improve survival in selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, but bear a significant risk of perioperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the quality of life (QoL) following cytoreduction and HIPEC. Methods: In this study including 40 patients (65% females) with different primary tumors, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was applied prior to CS and HIPEC as well as 3, 9, and 18 months postoperatively. Results: Global health status was not impaired significantly following HIPEC. Scales and symptom scores that deteriorated 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.05), that is, physical, role, and social functions as well as fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, and diarrhea, all returned to preoperative values within 9 months. Conclusions: Following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC, QoL returns to preoperative levels within 9 months. Selected patients that are likely to benefit oncologically from HIPEC should not be denied this option for fear of reduced postoperative QoL. i 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Quality of life research within the EORTC—the EORTC QLQ-C30

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer by complete resection and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

            Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is fatal, despite standard systemic chemotherapy. A new approach that combines maximal surgery with maximal regional chemotherapy has potential to cure selected patients who have colorectal PC. The authors have reported the oncologic results of this combined treatment. The authors performed a retrospective study of 64 patients who had PC arising from colorectal adenocarcinomas, 19 (29.6%) of whom also had other metastases. These patients were treated by complete resection of all detectable tumors and by a 5-day course of early intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with mitomycin C, then by 5-fluorouracil (n = 37), or by intraoperative intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) with mitomycin C, alone or combined with cisplatin (n = 27), in 2 separate trials. In the trial of IPCH, aimed at selecting the most reliable procedure in terms of spatial diffusion and thermal homogeneity, the 27 patients were treated with 7 different procedures. The extent of PC was assessed precisely by using a peritoneal index. The median follow-up period for the entire patient population was 51.7 months. The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 9.3% and 54.6%, respectively. Most severe complications occurred in patients who required extensive cytoreductive surgery. Global and disease-free survival rates were respectively 60.1% and 54.7% at 2 years and were 27.4% and 18.4% at 5 years. Results were significantly better (P = 0.04) when patients were metastasis-free (apart from PC) and when the peritoneal index was lower than 16 (P = 0.005). IPCH seemed to be more effective than EPIC for treatment of PC. This treatment plan, which combined maximal surgery with maximal regional chemotherapy, cured approximately 25% of patients. This strategy was mainly applicable to patients with limited intraperitoneal cancer volume and no extraperitoneal involvement. IPCH proved to be more effective than EPIC but more difficult to use correctly. Future results should improve through routine use of the optimal hyperthermia procedure, with improvements in the composition of instillate, better patient selection, and the reduction in the rate of complications that occurs with physician experience. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Peritoneal carcinomatosis: patients selection, perioperative complications and quality of life related to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

              Background Peritoneal tumor dissemination arising from colorectal cancer, appendiceal cancer, gastric cancer, gynecologic malignancies or peritoneal mesothelioma is a common sign of advanced tumor stage or disease recurrence and mostly associated with poor prognosis. Methods and results In the present review article preoperative workup, surgical technique, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, oncological outcome and quality of life after CRS and HIPEC are reported regarding the different tumor entities. Conclusion Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) provide a promising combined treatment strategy for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis that can improve patient survival and quality of life. The extent of intraperitoneal tumor dissemination and the completeness of cytoreduction are the leading predictors of postoperative patient outcome. Thus, consistent preoperative diagnostics and patient selection are crucial to obtain a complete macroscopic cytoreduction (CCR-0/1).

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DSU
                Dig Surg
                10.1159/issn.0253-4886
                Digestive Surgery
                S. Karger AG
                0253-4886
                1421-9883
                2014
                January 2015
                03 December 2014
                : 31
                : 4-5
                : 334-340
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich and bDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Sana Klinikum Hof, Hof, Germany
                Author notes
                *Prof. Dr. med. Martin K. Angele, Ludwig Maximilians University, Grosshadern Campus, Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Marchioninistr. 15, DE-81377 Munich (Germany), E-Mail Martin.Angele@med.uni-muenchen.de
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-5062
                Article
                369259 Dig Surg 2014;31:334-340
                10.1159/000369259
                25471828
                af730879-3d7d-464d-890c-f3ce79e2623f
                © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 25 July 2014
                : 19 October 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
                Peritoneal neoplasms,Quality of life,Cytoreductive surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log