1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Enhancement of solute clearance using pulsatile push-pull dialysate flow for the Quanta SC+: A novel clinic-to-home haemodialysis system

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and objective

          The SC+ haemodialysis system developed by Quanta Dialysis Technologies is a small, easy-to-use dialysis system designed to improve patient access to self-care and home haemodialysis. A prototype variant of the standard SC+ device with a modified fluidic management system generating a pulsatile push-pull dialysate flow through the dialyser during use has been developed for evaluation. It was hypothesized that, as a consequence of the pulsatile push-pull flow through the dialyser, the boundary layers at the membrane surface would be disrupted, thereby enhancing solute transport across the membrane, modifying protein fouling and maintaining the surface area available for mass and fluid transport throughout the whole treatment, leading to solute transport (clearance) enhancement compared to normal haemodialysis (HD) operation.

          Methods

          The pumping action of the SC+ system was modified by altering the sequence and timings of the valves and pumps associated with the flow balancing chambers that push and pull dialysis fluid to and from the dialyser. Using this unique prototype device, solute clearance performance was assessed across a range of molecular weights in two related series of laboratory bench studies. The first measured dialysis fluid moving across the dialyser membrane using ultrasonic flowmeters to establish the validity of the approach; solute clearance was subsequently measured using fluorescently tagged dextran molecules as surrogates for uraemic toxins. The second study used human blood doped with uraemic toxins collected from the spent dialysate of dialysis patients to quantify solute transport. In both, the performance of the SC+ prototype was assessed alongside reference devices operating in HD and pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) modes.

          Results

          Initial testing with fluorescein-tagged dextran molecules (0.3 kDa, 4 kDa, 10 kDa and 20 kDa) established the validity of the experimental pulsatile push-pull operation in the SC+ system to enhance clearance and demonstrated a 10 to 15% improvement above the current HD mode used in clinic today. The magnitude of the observed enhancement compared favourably with that achieved using pre-dilution HDF with a substitution fluid flow rate of 60 mL/min (equivalent to a substitution volume of 14.4 L in a 4-hour session) with the same dialyser and marker molecules.

          Additional testing using human blood indicated a comparable performance to pre-dilution HDF; however, in contrast with HDF, which demonstrated a gradual decrease in solute removal, the clearance values using the pulsatile push-pull method on the SC+ system were maintained over the entire duration of treatment. Overall albumin losses were not different.

          Conclusions

          Results obtained using an experimental pulsatile push-pull dialysis flow configuration with an aqueous blood analogue and human blood ex vivo demonstrate an enhancement of solute transport across the dialyser membrane. The level of enhancement makes this approach comparable with that achieved using pre-dilution HDF with a substitution fluid flow rate of 60 mL/min (equivalent to a substitution volume of 14.4 L in a 4-hour session). The observed enhancement of solute transport is attributed to the disruption of the boundary layers at the fluid-membrane interface which, when used with blood, minimizes protein fouling and maintains the surface area.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Evaluation of the efficacy of a medium cut-off dialyser and comparison with other high-flux dialysers in conventional haemodialysis and online haemodiafiltration

          ABSTRACT Background Online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality versus conventional haemodialysis (HD); however, it is not always available. In these situations, a novel class of membranes with a higher pore size, medium cut-off (MCO) dialysers, could be promising. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an MCO dialyser in the removal of small and medium-size molecules and compare it with standard high-flux (HF) dialysers in HD and OL-HDF. Methods In this crossover study, 18 prevalent HD patients were studied in three single mid-week dialysis treatments during three consecutive weeks as follows: first week with OL-HDF with a standard HF dialyser, second week with conventional HD with a standard HF dialyser and third week with conventional HD with an MCO dialyser. Reduction ratios (RRs) of different-sized molecules and albumin losses were collected for the different dialysers. Results MCO HD provided a greater reduction of middle and larger middle molecules compared with standard HF HD [rate reduction (RR) β2-microglobulin 74.7% versus 69.7%, P=0.01; RR myoglobin 62.5% versus 34.3%, P=0.001; RR prolactin 60% versus 32.8%, P=0.001; RR α1-glycoprotein 2.8% versus −0.1%, P=0.01]. We found no difference in the clearance of small and larger middle molecules comparing MCO HD with OL-HDF. Albumin losses were 0.03  g/session with MCO HD and 3.1  g/session with OL-HDF (P=0.001). Conclusion MCO HD is superior to standard HF HD in the removal of middle and larger middle molecules and it is not inferior to OL-HDF in the clearance of small and larger middle molecules. Thus it could be an alternative in patients in which it is not possible to perform OL-HDF.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Current approaches to middle molecule removal: room for innovation

            Abstract Aggressive removal of middle molecules or larger low-molecular-weight proteins (LMWPs) has been a growing concern following studies on their harmful effects on the mortality and morbidity of chronic dialysis patients. To remove larger LMWPs and some protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs), high- and medium-cutoff (HCOs and MCOs, respectively) membranes, convective therapy and protein adsorptive membranes are available. When we use HCO or MCO membranes for convective therapy, we have to take care to avoid massive albumin leakage during a dialysis session. Convection volume is an important element to increase middle molecule removal; however, a larger convection volume has a risk of larger leakage of albumin. Predilution hemodiafiltration is a useful measurement to increase larger LMWPs without massive albumin leakage. β2-microglobulin (B2M), α1-microglobulin (A1M) and albumin leakage during a dialysis session are useful parameters for assessing middle-molecule removal. Reduction ratios of B2M >80% and of A1M >35% are favorable to improve severe dialysis-related symptoms. The efficacy of middle molecule removal should be evaluated in comparison with clinical outcomes, mortality, morbidity and the improvement of dialysis-related symptoms. Recently some dialysis-related symptoms such as sleep disturbance, skin itchiness and dialysis hypotension have been recognized as good surrogate makers for mortality. Further studies to evaluate the relationship between middle molecule or PBUTs removal and the improvement of patient symptoms should be performed in well-designed randomized controlled trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              An economic assessment model for in-center, conventional home, and more frequent home hemodialysis

              More intensive and/or frequent hemodialysis may provide clinical benefits to patients with end-stage renal disease; however, these dialysis treatments are more convenient to the patients if provided in their homes. Here we created a standardized model, based on a systematic review of available costing literature, to determine the economic viability of providing hemodialysis in the home that arrays costs and common approaches for assessing direct medical and nonmedical costs. Our model was based on data from Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The first year start-up costs for all hemodialysis modalities were higher than in subsequent years with modeled costs for conventional home hemodialysis lower than in-center hemodialysis in subsequent years. Modeled costs for frequent home hemodialysis was higher than both in-center and conventional home hemodialysis in the United Kingdom, but lower than in-center hemodialysis and higher than conventional home hemodialysis in Australia and Canada in subsequent years. The higher costs of frequent compared to conventional home hemodialysis were because of higher consumable usage due to dialysis frequency. Thus, our findings reinforce the conclusions of previous studies showing that home-based conventional and more frequent hemodialysis may provide clinical benefit at reasonable costs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: SupervisionRole: Validation
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: SupervisionRole: Validation
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysis
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2 March 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 3
                : e0229233
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Quanta Dialysis Technologies Ltd, Alcester, Warwickshire, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [3 ] University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
                [4 ] EXcorLab GmbH, Industrie Center Obernburg, Obernburg, Germany
                Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, BRAZIL
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Our commercial affiliation does not alter our adherence of any author to all PLOS ONE policies. Please note that this development is not a commercially available machine so there can be no financial gain and is considered by ourselves as precompetitive research to be shared. From the perspective of intellectual property, please note methods of treatment are not patentable under European law so we do not have competing interests in that regard either.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8197-3944
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3951-6077
                Article
                PONE-D-19-16719
                10.1371/journal.pone.0229233
                7051047
                32119698
                af8f66fc-a0ff-470d-aa89-ac26ffc0be67
                © 2020 Buckberry et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 August 2019
                : 1 February 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 4, Pages: 19
                Funding
                This work was funded by Quanta Dialysis Technologies as part of its future research programme of engineering development. That included funding of eXcorlab by Quanta to provide an independent assessment using another manufacturers dialysis machine. The funder provided support in the form of salaries and facilities for authors CB, JM who are full-time employees of the funder. eXcorlab were contracted as an independent company to Quanta in provide objective evidence against a known industry standard. NH and DK are independent consultants and members of each companies own Medical Advisory Board respectively. It was the author CB, who determined the study design and developed the experimental test methods at Quanta. eXcorlab protocols were developed independently of Quanta’s in order to maintain objectivity by the authors HDL and MR.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nephrology
                Medical Dialysis
                Engineering and Technology
                Membrane Technology
                Membrane Dialysis
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Separation Processes
                Molecular Dialysis
                Membrane Dialysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Classical Mechanics
                Continuum Mechanics
                Fluid Mechanics
                Fluid Dynamics
                Fluid Flow
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                States of Matter
                Fluids
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Glycobiology
                Polysaccharides
                Glucans
                Dextran
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Physiology
                Solute Transport
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Classical Mechanics
                Continuum Mechanics
                Fluid Mechanics
                Fluid Dynamics
                Flow Rate
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data within the manuscript and its supporting information files is available from the authors and has been uploaded onto PLos One as supporting information as excel spreadsheets.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article