4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phages adapt to recognize an O-antigen polysaccharide site by mutating the “backup” tail protein ORF59, enabling reinfection of phage-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Phages demonstrate remarkable promise as antimicrobial agents against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. However, the emergence of phage-resistant strains poses challenges to their effective application. In this paper, we presented the isolation of a phage adaptive mutant that demonstrated enhanced and sustained antibacterial efficacy through the co-evolution of Klebsiella pneumoniae ( K. pneumoniae) 111-2 and phage ZX1Δint in vitro. Our experiments revealed that phage ZX1Δint successfully completed the adsorption phase by binding to the host surface, specifically targeting the capsular polysaccharide (CPS) receptor via the primary receptor-binding protein (RBP) ORF60 and the auxiliary RBP ORF59. Upon exposure to phage predation, mutations in genes wbaP, wbaZ or wzc, which encode the synthesis of the CPS, conferred resistance by reducing phage adsorption. In response to these host defense mechanisms, the adaptive mutant phages have evolved to utilize an alternative binding site located on an O-antigen site of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) through a mutation in the backup RBP ORF59. This evolutionary change enabled the phages to reinfect previously phage-resistant strains. Notably, the adaptive mutant phage PR2 carrying the ORF59 mutation Q777R, demonstrated the capacity to infect both wild-type and resistant strains, exhibiting prolonged antimicrobial activity against the wild strains. In conclusion, our findings elucidated a complex phage-host adsorption-antagonism mechanism characterized by mutation-driven alterations in phage receptor recognition. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of phage adaptability and highlights the potential for phages to combat phage-resistant bacteria through an in vitro evolutionary approach.

          GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms.

          Phages are now acknowledged as the most abundant microorganisms on the planet and are also possibly the most diversified. This diversity is mostly driven by their dynamic adaptation when facing selective pressure such as phage resistance mechanisms, which are widespread in bacterial hosts. When infecting bacterial cells, phages face a range of antiviral mechanisms, and they have evolved multiple tactics to avoid, circumvent or subvert these mechanisms in order to thrive in most environments. In this Review, we highlight the most important antiviral mechanisms of bacteria as well as the counter-attacks used by phages to evade these systems.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Bacteria–phage coevolution as a driver of ecological and evolutionary processes in microbial communities

            Bacteria–phage coevolution, the reciprocal evolution between bacterial hosts and the phages that infect them, is an important driver of ecological and evolutionary processes in microbial communities. There is growing evidence from both laboratory and natural populations that coevolution can maintain phenotypic and genetic diversity, increase the rate of bacterial and phage evolution and divergence, affect community structure, and shape the evolution of ecologically relevant bacterial traits. Although the study of bacteria–phage coevolution is still in its infancy, with open questions regarding the specificity of the interaction, the gene networks of coevolving partners, and the relative importance of the coevolving interaction in complex communities and environments, there have recently been major advancements in the field. In this review, we sum up our current understanding of bacteria–phage coevolution both in the laboratory and in nature, discuss recent findings on both the coevolutionary process itself and the impact of coevolution on bacterial phenotype, diversity and interactions with other species (particularly their eukaryotic hosts), and outline future directions for the field.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences.

              Bacteria and their viral predators (bacteriophages) are locked in a constant battle. In order to proliferate in phage-rich environments, bacteria have an impressive arsenal of defence mechanisms, and in response, phages have evolved counter-strategies to evade these antiviral systems. In this Review, we describe the various tactics that are used by phages to overcome bacterial resistance mechanisms, including adsorption inhibition, restriction-modification, CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) systems and abortive infection. Furthermore, we consider how these observations have enhanced our knowledge of phage biology, evolution and phage-host interactions.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Emerg Microbes Infect
                Emerg Microbes Infect
                Emerging Microbes & Infections
                Taylor & Francis
                2222-1751
                16 January 2025
                2025
                16 January 2025
                : 14
                : 1
                : 2455592
                Affiliations
                [a ]College of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Comparative Medicine, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                [b ]National Clinical Research Center, Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital , Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
                [c ]Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
                [d ]Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses , Yangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                [e ]Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, The Ministry of Education of China , Yangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                [CONTACT ] Hongzhou Lu luhongzhou@ 123456fudan.edu.cn No. 29 Bulan Road, Shenzhen 518112, People’s Republic of China
                Jiayin Shen johnnie1111@ 123456hotmail.com No. 88 University South Road, Yangzhou 225009, People’s Republic of China
                Xin Zhou zhou_xin@ 123456126.com No. 29 Bulan Road, Shenzhen 518112, People’s Republic of China

                Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2025.2455592.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2515-704X
                Article
                2455592
                10.1080/22221751.2025.2455592
                11795761
                39817558
                af9b2ab9-6ba4-4802-800f-90282694efce
                © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of Shanghai Shangyixun Cultural Communication Co., Ltd

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 71, Pages: 20, Words: 8660
                Categories
                Drug Resistance and Novel Antimicrobial Agents
                Research Article

                klebsiella pneumoniae,phage receptor,receptor-binding protein,capsular polysaccharides,lipopolysaccharide o-antigen

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log