1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Plantar pressure-based temporal analysis of gait disturbance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Indications from a pilot longitudinal study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet

          Circulation, 101(23)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: stride-to-stride variations of gait cycle timing in Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease.

            The basal ganglia are thought to play an important role in regulating motor programs involved in gait and in the fluidity and sequencing of movement. We postulated that the ability to maintain a steady gait, with low stride-to-stride variability of gait cycle timing and its subphases, would be diminished with both Parkinson's disease (PD) and Huntington's disease (HD). To test this hypothesis, we obtained quantitative measures of stride-to-stride variability of gait cycle timing in subjects with PD (n = 15), HD (n = 20), and disease-free controls (n = 16). All measures of gait variability were significantly increased in PD and HD. In subjects with PD and HD, gait variability measures were two and three times that observed in control subjects, respectively. The degree of gait variability correlated with disease severity. In contrast, gait speed was significantly lower in PD, but not in HD, and average gait cycle duration and the time spent in many subphases of the gait cycle were similar in control subjects, HD subjects, and PD subjects. These findings are consistent with a differential control of gait variability, speed, and average gait cycle timing that may have implications for understanding the role of the basal ganglia in locomotor control and for quantitatively assessing gait in clinical settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization.

              Symmetry is a gait characteristic that is increasingly measured and reported, particularly in the stroke patient population. However, there is no accepted standard for assessing symmetry making it difficult to compare across studies and establish criteria to guide clinical decision making. This study compares the most common expressions of spatiotemporal gait symmetry to describe post-stroke gait and makes recommendations regarding the most suitable measure for standardization. The following symmetry equations were compared: symmetry ratio, symmetry index, gait asymmetry and symmetry angle using step length, swing time, stance time, double support time and an intra-limb ratio of swing: stance time. Comparisons were made within a group of 161 community-dwelling, ambulatory individuals with stroke and 81 healthy adults as a reference group. Our analysis supports the recommendations of the symmetry ratio as the equation for standardization and step length, swing time and stance time as the gait parameters to be used in the equation. Future work should focus on establishing the intra-individual variability of these measures and linking them to mechanisms of gait dysfunction. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
                Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
                Elsevier BV
                01692607
                April 2022
                April 2022
                : 217
                : 106691
                Article
                10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106691
                35176597
                afaa5999-a25a-45d7-bf8b-e515037b7d86
                © 2022

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article