13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Helping Callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline Who Are at Imminent Risk of Suicide: Evaluation of Caller Risk Profiles and Interventions Implemented

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Crisis lines are settings where identifying individuals at imminent risk of suicidal behavior and intervening to keep them safe are critical activities. We examined clinical characteristics of crisis callers assessed by telephone crisis helpers as being at imminent risk of suicide, and the interventions implemented with these callers. Data were derived from 491 call reports completed by 132 helpers at eight crisis centers in the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline network. Helpers actively engaged the callers in collaborating to keep themselves safe on 76.4% of calls and sent emergency services without the callers' collaboration on 24.6% of calls. Four different profiles of imminent risk calls emerged. Caller profiles and some helper characteristics were associated with intervention type. Our findings provide a first step toward an empirical formulation of imminent risk warning signs and recommended interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The interpersonal theory of suicide.

          Suicidal behavior is a major problem worldwide and, at the same time, has received relatively little empirical attention. This relative lack of empirical attention may be due in part to a relative absence of theory development regarding suicidal behavior. The current article presents the interpersonal theory of suicidal behavior. We propose that the most dangerous form of suicidal desire is caused by the simultaneous presence of two interpersonal constructs-thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness (and hopelessness about these states)-and further that the capability to engage in suicidal behavior is separate from the desire to engage in suicidal behavior. According to the theory, the capability for suicidal behavior emerges, via habituation and opponent processes, in response to repeated exposure to physically painful and/or fear-inducing experiences. In the current article, the theory's hypotheses are more precisely delineated than in previous presentations (Joiner, 2005), with the aim of inviting scientific inquiry and potential falsification of the theory's hypotheses. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Safety Planning Intervention: A Brief Intervention to Mitigate Suicide Risk

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Warning signs for suicide: theory, research, and clinical applications.

              The current article addresses the issue of warning signs for suicide, attempting to differentiate the construct from risk factors. In accordance with the characteristic features discussed, a consensus set of warning signs identified by the American Association of Suicidology working group are presented, along with a discussion of relevant clinical and research applications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
                Suicide Life Threat Behav
                Wiley
                03630234
                April 2016
                April 2016
                August 04 2015
                : 46
                : 2
                : 172-190
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; College of Physicians & Surgeons; Columbia University; New York NY USA
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology; School of Public Health; Columbia University; New York NY USA
                [3 ]New York State Psychiatric Institute; New York NY USA
                [4 ]Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; New York State Psychiatric Institute; New York NY USA
                [5 ]Department of Psychiatry; College of Physicians & Surgeons; Columbia University; New York NY USA
                [6 ]Department of Biostatistics; School of Public Health; Columbia University; New York NY USA
                [7 ]Clinical Psychology; Auburn University; Auburn AL USA
                [8 ]Division of Biostatistics; Department of Psychiatry; Columbia University; New York NY USA
                [9 ]Division of Prevention, Traumatic Stress, and Special Programs; Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS); Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; Rockville MD USA
                Article
                10.1111/sltb.12182
                26242234
                affc7dca-03ed-44cc-a2e5-ab75ce507eb7
                © 2015

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article