62
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global Conservation Priorities for Marine Turtles

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , * , 1 , 4 , 1 , 5 , 1 , 6 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 9 , 1 , 10 , 1 , 11 , 1 , 5 , 1 , 12 , 1 , 13 , 1 , 14 , 1 , 15 , 16 , 1 , 17 , 1 , 18 , 1 , 19 , 1 , 20 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 21 , 1 , 22 , 1 , 23 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 24 , 25 , 1 , 24 , 1 , 26 , 1 , 27 , 1 , 28 , 1 , 2 , 29 , 30 , 1 , 31 , 1 , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Where conservation resources are limited and conservation targets are diverse, robust yet flexible priority-setting frameworks are vital. Priority-setting is especially important for geographically widespread species with distinct populations subject to multiple threats that operate on different spatial and temporal scales. Marine turtles are widely distributed and exhibit intra-specific variations in population sizes and trends, as well as reproduction and morphology. However, current global extinction risk assessment frameworks do not assess conservation status of spatially and biologically distinct marine turtle Regional Management Units (RMUs), and thus do not capture variations in population trends, impacts of threats, or necessary conservation actions across individual populations. To address this issue, we developed a new assessment framework that allowed us to evaluate, compare and organize marine turtle RMUs according to status and threats criteria. Because conservation priorities can vary widely (i.e. from avoiding imminent extinction to maintaining long-term monitoring efforts) we developed a “conservation priorities portfolio” system using categories of paired risk and threats scores for all RMUs (n = 58). We performed these assessments and rankings globally, by species, by ocean basin, and by recognized geopolitical bodies to identify patterns in risk, threats, and data gaps at different scales. This process resulted in characterization of risk and threats to all marine turtle RMUs, including identification of the world's 11 most endangered marine turtle RMUs based on highest risk and threats scores. This system also highlighted important gaps in available information that is crucial for accurate conservation assessments. Overall, this priority-setting framework can provide guidance for research and conservation priorities at multiple relevant scales, and should serve as a model for conservation status assessments and priority-setting for widespread, long-lived taxa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Regional Management Units for Marine Turtles: A Novel Framework for Prioritizing Conservation and Research across Multiple Scales

          Background Resolving threats to widely distributed marine megafauna requires definition of the geographic distributions of both the threats as well as the population unit(s) of interest. In turn, because individual threats can operate on varying spatial scales, their impacts can affect different segments of a population of the same species. Therefore, integration of multiple tools and techniques — including site-based monitoring, genetic analyses, mark-recapture studies and telemetry — can facilitate robust definitions of population segments at multiple biological and spatial scales to address different management and research challenges. Methodology/Principal Findings To address these issues for marine turtles, we collated all available studies on marine turtle biogeography, including nesting sites, population abundances and trends, population genetics, and satellite telemetry. We georeferenced this information to generate separate layers for nesting sites, genetic stocks, and core distributions of population segments of all marine turtle species. We then spatially integrated this information from fine- to coarse-spatial scales to develop nested envelope models, or Regional Management Units (RMUs), for marine turtles globally. Conclusions/Significance The RMU framework is a solution to the challenge of how to organize marine turtles into units of protection above the level of nesting populations, but below the level of species, within regional entities that might be on independent evolutionary trajectories. Among many potential applications, RMUs provide a framework for identifying data gaps, assessing high diversity areas for multiple species and genetic stocks, and evaluating conservation status of marine turtles. Furthermore, RMUs allow for identification of geographic barriers to gene flow, and can provide valuable guidance to marine spatial planning initiatives that integrate spatial distributions of protected species and human activities. In addition, the RMU framework — including maps and supporting metadata — will be an iterative, user-driven tool made publicly available in an online application for comments, improvements, download and analysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Persistent Leatherback Turtle Migrations Present Opportunities for Conservation

            Introduction Leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in the eastern Pacific (EP) have exhibited population declines of up to 90% during the past two decades [1,2]. These declines have been driven by a number of factors, including incidental mortality in fisheries, loss of nesting habitats, and unsustainable egg harvest [1,3]. Of the extant leatherback nesting beaches in the EP, Playa Grande in Parque Nacional Marino Las Baulas (PNMB), Costa Rica, supports the largest nesting colony [1]. After the nesting period (approximately 60 d), EP leatherbacks perform long-distance migrations from breeding areas to feeding areas, where they remain for 2 to 7 y [4]. Therefore, while protection of nesting habitat is important to enhance recruitment into the population, an improved understanding of the at-sea distribution and movements of EP leatherbacks is vital to ensuring their long-term survival. In particular, long-range tracking studies using electronic tags can inform conservation efforts by identifying high-use areas for leatherbacks in time and space, as well as environmental influences on leatherback behavior [5]. Leatherback turtles globally undertake long-distance migrations over thousands of kilometers [6–14]. Morreale et al. [6] first described the movements of EP leatherbacks from the tracks of eight turtles (durations 3–87 d) and identified a persistent southbound migration corridor from PNMB toward the Galápagos Islands. Additional tagging efforts at a nesting beach in Mexiquillo, México, about 965 km north of Costa Rica, revealed that leatherbacks traveled routes that shared the same directional heading and general high seas habitats in the eastern South Pacific as those traveled by Costa Rican turtles [7]. In contrast, leatherbacks from other populations demonstrate inter-individual behavioral variation with respect to post-nesting migration routes [8–10,13,14]. The apparent persistence of the EP leatherback migration pattern provides a unique opportunity to generate a cohesive conservation management approach for this endangered population. Conservation of highly migratory marine species requires international cooperation for implementation of transboundary management strategies. Specifically, information on movements and distributions of large marine predators collected by electronic tracking devices can provide guidance to the development of national and multinational fisheries management strategies and bycatch mitigation efforts, as well as support related policy efforts [15]. One such framework is the Eastern Tropical Pacific Seascape (ETPS) initiative [16], which is a multinational coordination of marine resource management within the combined exclusive economic zones of Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, and Ecuador. The ETPS is an area that is home to several marine protected areas (MPAs) (e.g., PNMB) and World Heritage sites (e.g., Cocos Island, Coiba Island National Park, Malpelo Island, Galápagos Islands and Marine Reserve). Thus, the ETPS represents a framework through which habitat use and movement data for migratory animals, such as leatherbacks, can be translated into tangible management actions. Here we present the largest multi-year tracking data set collected for this species, based on 46 individuals satellite-tagged during 2004–2007 at PNMB. Our approach is consistent with a recent review [17], which emphasized the importance of tracking large sample sizes and an interdisciplinary approach integrating oceanographic cues with behavior. These data enabled us to (1) describe the distribution and horizontal movements of leatherbacks in the EP, (2) examine the influence of oceanic currents on leatherback migrations, (3) assess leatherback high-use habitats, (4) confirm and elucidate a leatherback migration corridor from the nesting beach to 5 °S, and (5) describe leatherback movements beyond 10 °S into the South Pacific. In addition, these data identify critical areas for directed conservation efforts to ensure the survival of this species in the EP. Results We tagged 46 female leatherback turtles during oviposition, resulting in 12,095 tracking days spanning 21 January 2004–5 July 2007, with a mean track duration of 263 d, a distance of 8,070 km, and a travel speed of 37.7 km d−1 (Table 1). Movements by cohorts from a given year displayed cohesion, even though initiation of the post-nesting migration among individuals differed by up to several weeks (Figure 1). Only one individual tagged in 2005 (tag ID 56280) remained in coastal waters off Costa Rica and Panama for the entire tag duration (Figure 1A). Table 1 Tracking Data from 46 Satellite-Linked Tags Deployed on Leatherback Turtles on Playa Grande, Costa Rica, 2004–-2007 Figure 1 Map and Timeline of Leatherback Sea Turtle Tracking Data (A) Satellite transmission positions for 46 leatherback turtles from 2004 (n = 27, orange), 2005 (n = 8, purple), and 2007 (n = 11, green), tagged at Playa Grande, Costa Rica, overlaid on bathymetry (in m). Prominent bathymetric features and island groups are labeled (EPR = East Pacific Rise). (B) Timeline of satellite transmissions for each tag (tag ID is the ARGOS-assigned transmitter number). Upon completion of nesting activity, leatherbacks embarked on rapid (42.9 km d−1, standard deviation (sd) = 27.7 km d−1) directed southward migrations through the equatorial region. Once south of 5 °S, the turtles dispersed throughout the South Pacific Gyre following slower (23.8 km d−1, sd = 16 km d−1), meandering paths, and remained there through the duration of the tracking period (Figure 2A–2C). Across their migrations, turtles experienced a wide range of surface temperatures (11.2–32.7 °C, mean = 25.2 °C, sd = 3.2 °C; Table 1). They encountered areas of high–eddy kinetic energy (EKE) in the equatorial region (>100 cm2s−2), and areas of very low EKE ( 0.3 mg m−3), and lowest in the South Pacific Gyre ( + ). These calculations were performed separately for the February–April period of each tracking year, since the emphasis was on assessing the impact of inter-annual variability in geostrophic current strength on turtle migration while crossing the equatorial region. On the other hand, we computed EKE as a long-term mean for the period 14 October 1992–18 April 2007 from the mean geostrophic velocity anomalies (u′ and v′), as EKE = 0.5*( + ). In this case, the emphasis was on examining turtle distribution in relation to a region of low mesoscale variability in the South Pacific Gyre. Phytoplankton CHL concentration. The distribution of phytoplankton standing stock is a useful indicator of biogeography and ecosystem structure [24]. Near-surface CHL concentration, a proxy for phytoplankton standing stock, was obtained from Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) satellite ocean-color observations at 9-km resolution. We computed a long-term mean for the period September 1997–March 2007 for comparison of turtle movements in relation to phytoplanktonic biomass distribution throughout their range. Individual 8-d averages were also obtained for each turtle median daily position. The relationship between CHL and the turtles' median daily speed was investigated using linear regression, after log- and square-root-transformation, respectively, to meet normality assumptions. Digital bathymetry. We extracted bathymetry from the global sea-floor topography of Smith and Sandwell [52], version 8.2 (November 2000) (http://topex.ucsd.edu/WWW_html/mar_topo.html). This dataset combines all available depth soundings with high-resolution marine gravity information provided by the Geosat, ERS-1/2, and TOPEX/Poseidon satellite altimeters, and has a nominal resolution of 2 arc min (∼4 km). The 2000-m isobath was extracted from this dataset to obtain the outline of the Cocos Ridge, the most prominent bathymetric feature in the migration corridor region (12 °N–5 °S) running northeast (∼43° azimuth) for ∼1,200 km between Galápagos and Central America. Geomagnetism. Data on Earth's magnetic field (force and inclination) in the study area were calculated using the software GeoMag 6.0, available from the NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/geom_util/geomutil.shtml), and the most recent (2005) International Geomagnetic Reference Field 10th generation (IGRF-10) coefficients. Supporting Information Figure S1 Surface Currents and Vertical Thermal Structure in the Eastern Tropical and South Pacific Schematic representation of near-surface currents and vertical thermal structure in the eastern tropical and South Pacific, based on climatological annual data. (A) Current vectors (black) overlaid on current magnitude (colors; in cm s−1). Dashed black line denotes subsurface flow; dashed white line indicates a section along 95 °W. (B) Surface zonal (black arrows) and meridional (orange arrows) velocities (in cm s−1) along 95 °W. (C) Water-column temperature (colors; in °C) and the 15, 20, and 25 °C isotherms (black contours) along 95 °W. Zonal currents are represented as encircled x's for westward flows and encircled dots for eastward flows. Abbreviations are defined in the text. (2.57 MB TIF) Click here for additional data file. Text S1 Currents and Thermal Structure of the Eastern Tropical and South Pacific (29 KB DOC) Click here for additional data file.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Pacific leatherback turtles face extinction.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2011
                28 September 2011
                : 6
                : 9
                : e24510
                Affiliations
                [1 ]IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group – Burning Issues Working Group, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America
                [2 ]Global Marine Division, Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America
                [3 ]Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina, United States of America
                [4 ]Marine Geospatial Ecology Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
                [5 ]Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research and Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
                [6 ]Ecological Modelling Services, Pty Ltd, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
                [7 ]Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México
                [8 ]Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
                [9 ]Island Conservation Society, Victoria, Mahé, Republic of Seychelles
                [10 ]Marine Turtle Ecology and Assessment Program, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA-National Marine Fisheries Service, La Jolla, California, United States of America
                [11 ]Centro de Investigación para el Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, Cali, Colombia
                [12 ]Laboratoire Ressources Halieutiques, IFREMER, Île de la Réunion, France
                [13 ]Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, Kaneohe, Hawaii, United States of America
                [14 ]Banco de Información sobre Tortugas Marinas (BITMAR), Unidad Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México
                [15 ]Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin,” University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy
                [16 ]WWF Mediterranean Turtle Programme, World Wildlife Fund-Italy, Rome, Italy
                [17 ]Department of Endangered Species Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
                [18 ]World Wildlife Fund-Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique
                [19 ]Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, California, United States of America
                [20 ]Karumbé, Montevideo, Uruguay
                [21 ]Association RENATURA, Albens, France, and Pointe-Noire, Congo
                [22 ]Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
                [23 ]School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
                [24 ]Projeto Tamar-ICMBio/Fundação Pro Tamar, Salvador, Bahía, Brazil
                [25 ]Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [26 ]Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia, United States of America
                [27 ]School of Environmental Sciences, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Summerstrand Campus, South Africa
                [28 ]Marine Research Foundation, Sabah, Malaysia
                [29 ]Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
                [30 ]Scientific Advisory Committee, Sea Turtle Conservancy, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
                [31 ]Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Melbourne Beach, Florida, United States of America
                National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Marine Fisheries Service/Southwest Fisheries Science Center, United States of America
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: BPW ADD ABB MYC BJH NJP RBM. Performed the experiments: BPW ADD ABB MYC BJH FAAG J. A. Mortimer JAS DA KAB JB BWB RBD PC BCC AC PHD AF EMF AG MG MH BJH MLM MAM J. A. Musick RN NJP ST BW RBM. Analyzed the data: BPW ADD ABB MYC BJH FAAG J. A. Mortimer JAS DA KAB JB BWB RBD PC BCC AC PHD AF EMF AG MG MH BJH MLM MAM J. A. Musick RN NJP ST BW RBM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BPW ADD ABB MYC BJH FAAG J. A. Mortimer JAS DA KAB JB BWB RBD PC BCC AC PHD AF EMF AG MG MH BJH MLM MAM J. A. Musick RN NJP ST BW RBM. Wrote the paper: BPW ADD ABB MYC BJH FAAG J. A. Mortimer JAS KAB PC AG MG MH MLM MAM RN RBM.

                Article
                PONE-D-11-08498
                10.1371/journal.pone.0024510
                3182175
                21969858
                b02fdeec-69c8-44b5-8a45-f20e79b93582
                Wallace et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 13 May 2011
                : 11 August 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Conservation Science
                Species Extinction
                Earth Sciences
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences
                Marine Ecology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article