8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of Mobile Health Apps and Wearable Technology to Assess Changes and Predict Pain During Treatment of Acute Pain in Sickle Cell Disease: Feasibility Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited red blood cell disorder affecting millions worldwide, and it results in many potential medical complications throughout the life course. The hallmark of SCD is pain. Many patients experience daily chronic pain as well as intermittent, unpredictable acute vaso-occlusive painful episodes called pain crises. These pain crises often require acute medical care through the day hospital or emergency department. Following presentation, a number of these patients are subsequently admitted with continued efforts of treatment focused on palliative pain control and hydration for management. Mitigating pain crises is challenging for both the patients and their providers, given the perceived unpredictability and subjective nature of pain.

          Objective

          The objective of this study was to show the feasibility of using objective, physiologic measurements obtained from a wearable device during an acute pain crisis to predict patient-reported pain scores (in an app and to nursing staff) using machine learning techniques.

          Methods

          For this feasibility study, we enrolled 27 adult patients presenting to the day hospital with acute pain. At the beginning of pain treatment, each participant was given a wearable device (Microsoft Band 2) that collected physiologic measurements. Pain scores from our mobile app, Technology Resources to Understand Pain Assessment in Patients with Pain, and those obtained by nursing staff were both used with wearable signals to complete time stamp matching and feature extraction and selection. Following this, we constructed regression and classification machine learning algorithms to build between-subject pain prediction models.

          Results

          Patients were monitored for an average of 3.79 (SD 2.23) hours, with an average of 5826 (SD 2667) objective data values per patient. As expected, we found that pain scores and heart rate decreased for most patients during the course of their stay. Using the wearable sensor data and pain scores, we were able to create a regression model to predict subjective pain scores with a root mean square error of 1.430 and correlation between observations and predictions of 0.706. Furthermore, we verified the hypothesis that the regression model outperformed the classification model by comparing the performances of the support vector machines (SVM) and the SVM for regression.

          Conclusions

          The Microsoft Band 2 allowed easy collection of objective, physiologic markers during an acute pain crisis in adults with SCD. Features can be extracted from these data signals and matched with pain scores. Machine learning models can then use these features to feasibly predict patient pain scores.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A tutorial on support vector regression

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Wrappers for feature subset selection

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort

              The ability to measure physical activity through wrist-worn devices provides an opportunity for cardiovascular medicine. However, the accuracy of commercial devices is largely unknown. The aim of this work is to assess the accuracy of seven commercially available wrist-worn devices in estimating heart rate (HR) and energy expenditure (EE) and to propose a wearable sensor evaluation framework. We evaluated the Apple Watch, Basis Peak, Fitbit Surge, Microsoft Band, Mio Alpha 2, PulseOn, and Samsung Gear S2. Participants wore devices while being simultaneously assessed with continuous telemetry and indirect calorimetry while sitting, walking, running, and cycling. Sixty volunteers (29 male, 31 female, age 38 ± 11 years) of diverse age, height, weight, skin tone, and fitness level were selected. Error in HR and EE was computed for each subject/device/activity combination. Devices reported the lowest error for cycling and the highest for walking. Device error was higher for males, greater body mass index, darker skin tone, and walking. Six of the devices achieved a median error for HR below 5% during cycling. No device achieved an error in EE below 20 percent. The Apple Watch achieved the lowest overall error in both HR and EE, while the Samsung Gear S2 reported the highest. In conclusion, most wrist-worn devices adequately measure HR in laboratory-based activities, but poorly estimate EE, suggesting caution in the use of EE measurements as part of health improvement programs. We propose reference standards for the validation of consumer health devices (http://precision.stanford.edu/).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMU
                JMIR mHealth and uHealth
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2291-5222
                December 2019
                2 December 2019
                : 7
                : 12
                : e13671
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Pediatrics Duke University Durham, NC United States
                [2 ] Department of Computer Science & Engineering Wright State University Dayton, OH United States
                [3 ] North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC United States
                [4 ] Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics Northwestern University Chicago, IL United States
                [5 ] Social Work and Clinical and Translational Science Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA United States
                [6 ] Division of Hematology Department of Medicine Duke University Durham, NC United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Amanda Johnson amanda@ 123456ohsu.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-9692
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-0662
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-8566
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9794-3755
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6015-8358
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-5594
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5662-5806
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7506-0935
                Article
                v7i12e13671
                10.2196/13671
                6915456
                31789599
                b037b942-c7ef-43c5-a1fb-786e68dc0872
                ©Amanda Johnson, Fan Yang, Siddharth Gollarahalli, Tanvi Banerjee, Daniel Abrams, Jude Jonassaint, Charles Jonassaint, Nirmish Shah. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 02.12.2019.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 9 February 2019
                : 27 April 2019
                : 22 June 2019
                : 19 July 2019
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                pain,sickle cell disease,scd,machine learning
                pain, sickle cell disease, scd, machine learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article