14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimal Time Intervals in Two-Stage Takeover Warning Systems With Insight Into the Drivers’ Neuroticism Personality

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Conditional automated driving [level 3, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)] requires drivers to take over the vehicle when an automated system’s failure occurs or is about to leave its operational design domain. Two-stage warning systems, which warn drivers in two steps, can be a promising method to guide drivers in preparing for the takeover. However, the proper time intervals of two-stage warning systems that allow drivers with different personalities to prepare for the takeover remain unclear. This study explored the optimal time intervals of two-stage warning systems with insights into the drivers’ neuroticism personality. A total of 32 drivers were distributed into two groups according to their self-ratings in neuroticism (high vs. low). Each driver experienced takeover under the two-stage warning systems with four time intervals (i.e., 3, 5, 7, and 9 s). The takeover performance (i.e., hands-on-steering-wheel time, takeover time, and maximum resulting acceleration) and subjective opinions (i.e., appropriateness and usefulness) for time intervals and situation awareness (SA) were recorded. The results showed that drivers in the 5-s time interval had the best takeover preparation (fast hands-on steering wheel responses and sufficient SA). Furthermore, both the 5- and 7-s time intervals resulted in more rapid takeover reactions and were rated more appropriate and useful than the 3- and 9-s time intervals. In terms of personality, drivers with high neuroticism tended to take over immediately after receiving takeover messages, at the cost of SA deficiency. In contrast, drivers with low neuroticism responded safely by judging whether they gained enough SA. We concluded that the 5-s time interval was optimal for drivers in two-stage takeover warning systems. When considering personality, drivers with low neuroticism had no strict requirements for time intervals. However, the extended time intervals were favorable for drivers with high neuroticism in developing SA. The present findings have reference implications for designers and engineers to set the time intervals of two-stage warning systems according to the neuroticism personality of drivers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision.

              D N Lee (1976)
              A theory is presented of how a driver might visually control his braking. A mathematical analysis of the changing optic array at the driver's eye indicates that the simplest type of visual information, which would be sufficient for controlling braking and would also be likely to be easily picked up by the driver, is information about time-to-collision, rather than information about distance, speed, or acceleration/deceleration. It is shown how the driver could, in principle, use visual information about time-to-collision in registering when he is on a collision course, in judging when to start braking, and in controlling his ongoing braking. Implications of the theory for safe speeds and safe following distances are discussed, taking into account visual angular velocity detection thresholds, and some suggestions are made as to how safety on the roads might be improved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                08 March 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 601536
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University , Hangzhou, China
                [2] 2Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University , Beijing, China
                [3] 3Modern Industrial Design Institute, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Andrej Košir, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

                Reviewed by: Domen Novak, University of Wyoming, United States; Kristina Stojmenova, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

                This article was submitted to Human-Media Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601536
                7982420
                b03c6022-cc22-4cab-844c-592ef10348f4
                Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Zeng, Yang, Kang, Wu, Shi, Ma and Li.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 September 2020
                : 13 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 3, Equations: 1, References: 51, Pages: 13, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: 31900768
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                takeover process,time intervals,neuroticism,situation awareness,takeover performance,lead time

                Comments

                Comment on this article