23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patients and Medical Staff Attitudes Toward the Future Inclusion of eHealth in Tuberculosis Management: Perspectives From Six Countries Evaluated using a Qualitative Framework

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Digitally delivering healthcare services is very attractive for tuberculosis (TB) management as this disease has a complex diagnosis and lengthy management and involves multiple medical and nonmedical specialists. Especially in low- and middle-income countries, eHealth could potentially offer cost-effective solutions to bridge financial, social, time, and distance challenges.

          Objective

          The goal of the research is to understand what would make eHealth globally applicable and gain insight into different TB situations, opportunities, and challenges.

          Methods

          We performed focus group interviews with TB experts and patients from 6 different countries on 4 different continents. The focus group interviews followed the theory of planned behavior framework to offer structured recommendations for a versatile eHealth solution. The focus group interviews were preceded by a general demographic and technology use questionnaire. Questionnaire results were analyzed using basic statistics in Excel (Microsoft Corporation). Focus group interview data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti 8 (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH) by assigning codes to quotations and grouping codes into the 5 domains within the framework.

          Results

          A total of 29 patients and 32 medical staff members were included in our study. All medical staff had used the internet, whereas 31% (9/61) of patients had never been online. The codes with the most quotations were information in relation to eHealth (144 quotations) and communication (67 quotations). The consensus among all participants from all countries is that there are important communication and information gaps that could be bridged by an eHealth app. Participants from different countries also highlighted different challenges, such as a majority of asylum-seeker patients or lack of infrastructure that could be addressed with an eHealth app.

          Conclusions

          Within the 6 countries interviewed, there is high enthusiasm toward eHealth in TB. A potential app could first target information and communication gaps in TB, with additional modules aimed at setting-specific challenges.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The theory of planned behavior

          Icek Ajzen (1991)
          Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: a cross‐market examination

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
                JMU
                JMIR mHealth and uHealth
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2291-5222
                November 2020
                2 November 2020
                : 8
                : 11
                : e18156
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology University Medical Centrum Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands
                [2 ] Pneumology Hospital Iasi Iasi Romania
                [3 ] Department of Internal Medicine University Medical Centrum Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands
                [4 ] Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention University Medical Centrum Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands
                [5 ] Department of Internal Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Indonesia
                [6 ] University Medical Centrum Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands
                [7 ] Agogo Presbyterian Hospital Agogo Ghana
                [8 ] Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, Tuberculosis Centrum Beatrixoord University Medical Centrum Groningen University of Groningen Haren Netherlands
                [9 ] University of Sydney Camperdown Australia
                [10 ] Westmead Hospital Sydney Australia
                [11 ] Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases, University of Sydney Sydney Australia
                [12 ] Health Psychology Section University Medical Centrum Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Ioana Margineanu ismargineanu@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0007-4838
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8682-0805
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-1774
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-0846
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-5311
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1196-3008
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-9260
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-0288
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-3771
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-8859
                Article
                v8i11e18156
                10.2196/18156
                7669445
                33136052
                b06db6c7-b2d2-43ee-a2da-955830dbfc9c
                ©Ioana Margineanu, Christina Louka, Maria Vincenti-Gonzalez, Antonia Morita Iswari Saktiawati, Johannes Schierle, Kabiru Mohammed Abass, Onno Akkerman, Jan-Willem Alffenaar, Adelita V Ranchor, Ymkje Stienstra. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 02.11.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 7 February 2020
                : 26 March 2020
                : 20 May 2020
                : 26 July 2020
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                ehealth,tuberculosis,policy,clinical,patient,perspective
                ehealth, tuberculosis, policy, clinical, patient, perspective

                Comments

                Comment on this article