8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global Muscle Coactivation of the Sound Limb in Gait of People with Transfemoral and Transtibial Amputation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the level of amputation and various prosthetic devices on the muscle activation of the sound limb in people with unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation. We calculated the global coactivation of 12 muscles using the time-varying multimuscle coactivation function method in 37 subjects with unilateral transfemoral amputation (10, 16, and 11 with mechanical, electronic, and bionic prostheses, respectively), 11 subjects with transtibial amputation, and 22 healthy subjects representing the control group. The results highlighted that people with amputation had a global coactivation temporal profile similar to that of healthy subjects. However, amputation increased the level of the simultaneous activation of many muscles during the loading response and push-off phases of the gait cycle and decreased it in the midstance and swing subphases. This increased coactivation probably plays a role in prosthetic gait asymmetry and energy consumption. Furthermore, people with amputation and wearing electronic prosthesis showed lower global coactivation when compared with people wearing mechanical and bionic prostheses. These findings suggest that the global lower limb coactivation behavior can be a useful tool to analyze the motor control strategies adopted and the ability to adapt to the prosthetic device.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The sources of external work in level walking and running.

            The work done at each step during level walking and running to lift the centre of mass of the body, Wv, and to increase its forward speed, Wf, and the total mechanical energy involved (potential + kinetic) Wext, have been measured at various 'constant' speeds (2-32 km/hr) with the technique described by Cavagna (1975). 2. At intermediate speeds of walking (about 4 km/hr) Wv = Wf and Wext/km is at a minimum, as is the energy cost. At lower speeds Wv greater than Wf whereas at higher speeds Wf greather than Wv: in both cases Wext/km increases. 3. The recovery of mechanical energy, through the pendular motion characteristic of walking, was measured as (/Wv/ + /Wf/ - Wext)/(/Wv/ + /Wf/): it attains a maximum (about 65%) at intermediate speeds. 4. A simple model, assuming that in walking the body rotates as an inverted pendulum over the foot in contact with the ground, fits the experimental data better at intermediate speeds but is no longer tenable above 7 km/hr. 5. In running the recovery defined above is minimal (0-4% independent of speed), i.e. Wext congruent to /Wv/ + /Wf/: potential and kinetic energy of the body do not interchange but are simultaneously taken up and released by the muscles with a rate increasing markedly with the speed (from about 1 to 4 h.p.). 6. Wext increases linearly with the running speed Vf from a positive y intercept owing to the fact that Wv is practically constant independent of Vf. On the contrary, Wf = aVf2/(1 + bVf), where b is the ratio between the time spent in the air and the forward distance covered while on the ground during each step.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use.

              Musculoskeletal imbalances or pathologies often develop into secondary physical conditions or complications that may affect the mobility and quality of life of people with lower-limb amputation. Using one or more prostheses causes people with amputation to alter the biomechanics of their movement. For example, people with lower-limb amputation often favor and stress their intact lower limb more during everyday activities. This can lead to degenerative changes such as osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip joints of the intact limb. Since people with amputation spend less time on their residual limb, osteopenia and subsequent osteoporosis often occur secondary to insufficient loading through the long bones of the lower limb. A proper prosthetic fit increases the probability of equal force distribution across the intact and prosthetic limbs during ambulation, thus decreasing the risk of osteoarthritis. People with limb loss commonly complain of back pain, which is linked to poor prosthetic fit and alignment, postural changes, leg-length discrepancy, amputation level, and general deconditioning. We review the literature on secondary complications among people with lower-limb loss who are long-term prosthesis wearers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                29 April 2020
                May 2020
                : 20
                : 9
                : 2543
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Human Neurosciences, University of Rome Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Monte Porzio Catone, 00185 Rome, Italy; t.varrecchia@ 123456inail.it (T.V.); f.draicchio@ 123456inail.it (F.D.); al.silvetti@ 123456inail.it (A.S.); a.ranavolo@ 123456inail.it (A.R.)
                [3 ]Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Rome Sapienza, 04100 Latina, Italy; mariano.serrao@ 123456uniroma1.it
                [4 ]Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Rome Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy; lorenzo.fiori@ 123456uniroma1.it
                [5 ]Department of Engineering, Roma TRE University, 00185 Rome, Italy; silvia.conforto@ 123456uniroma3.it (S.C.); cristiano.demarchis@ 123456uniroma3.it (C.D.M.)
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1315-1743
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-7454
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-6166
                Article
                sensors-20-02543
                10.3390/s20092543
                7249183
                32365715
                b09cbfa8-e9c8-4f6d-afba-331346c03411
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 April 2020
                : 27 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                lower limb amputation,prosthetic gait,muscle coactivation,surface electromyography

                Comments

                Comment on this article