49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional Relationships within Cnidaria

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cnidaria, the sister group to Bilateria, is a highly diverse group of animals in terms of morphology, lifecycles, ecology, and development. How this diversity originated and evolved is not well understood because phylogenetic relationships among major cnidarian lineages are unclear, and recent studies present contrasting phylogenetic hypotheses. Here, we use transcriptome data from 15 newly-sequenced species in combination with 26 publicly available genomes and transcriptomes to assess phylogenetic relationships among major cnidarian lineages. Phylogenetic analyses using different partition schemes and models of molecular evolution, as well as topology tests for alternative phylogenetic relationships, support the monophyly of Medusozoa, Anthozoa, Octocorallia, Hydrozoa, and a clade consisting of Staurozoa, Cubozoa, and Scyphozoa. Support for the monophyly of Hexacorallia is weak due to the equivocal position of Ceriantharia. Taken together, these results further resolve deep cnidarian relationships, largely support traditional phylogenetic views on relationships, and provide a historical framework for studying the evolutionary processes involved in one of the most ancient animal radiations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The magnitude of global marine species diversity.

          The question of how many marine species exist is important because it provides a metric for how much we do and do not know about life in the oceans. We have compiled the first register of the marine species of the world and used this baseline to estimate how many more species, partitioned among all major eukaryotic groups, may be discovered. There are ∼226,000 eukaryotic marine species described. More species were described in the past decade (∼20,000) than in any previous one. The number of authors describing new species has been increasing at a faster rate than the number of new species described in the past six decades. We report that there are ∼170,000 synonyms, that 58,000-72,000 species are collected but not yet described, and that 482,000-741,000 more species have yet to be sampled. Molecular methods may add tens of thousands of cryptic species. Thus, there may be 0.7-1.0 million marine species. Past rates of description of new species indicate there may be 0.5 ± 0.2 million marine species. On average 37% (median 31%) of species in over 100 recent field studies around the world might be new to science. Currently, between one-third and two-thirds of marine species may be undescribed, and previous estimates of there being well over one million marine species appear highly unlikely. More species than ever before are being described annually by an increasing number of authors. If the current trend continues, most species will be discovered this century. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships.

            The origin of many of the defining features of animal body plans, such as symmetry, nervous system, and the mesoderm, remains shrouded in mystery because of major uncertainty regarding the emergence order of the early branching taxa: the sponge groups, ctenophores, placozoans, cnidarians, and bilaterians. The "phylogenomic" approach [1] has recently provided a robust picture for intrabilaterian relationships [2, 3] but not yet for more early branching metazoan clades. We have assembled a comprehensive 128 gene data set including newly generated sequence data from ctenophores, cnidarians, and all four main sponge groups. The resulting phylogeny yields two significant conclusions reviving old views that have been challenged in the molecular era: (1) that the sponges (Porifera) are monophyletic and not paraphyletic as repeatedly proposed [4-9], thus undermining the idea that ancestral metazoans had a sponge-like body plan; (2) that the most likely position for the ctenophores is together with the cnidarians in a "coelenterate" clade. The Porifera and the Placozoa branch basally with respect to a moderately supported "eumetazoan" clade containing the three taxa with nervous system and muscle cells (Cnidaria, Ctenophora, and Bilateria). This new phylogeny provides a stimulating framework for exploring the important changes that shaped the body plans of the early diverging phyla.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estimation of divergence times in cnidarian evolution based on mitochondrial protein-coding genes and the fossil record.

              The phylum Cnidaria is comprised of remarkably diverse and ecologically significant taxa, such as the reef-forming corals, and occupies a basal position in metazoan evolution. The origin of this phylum and the most recent common ancestors (MRCAs) of its modern classes remain mostly unknown, although scattered fossil evidence provides some insights on this topic. Here, we investigate the molecular divergence times of the major taxonomic groups of Cnidaria (27 Hexacorallia, 16 Octocorallia, and 5 Medusozoa) on the basis of mitochondrial DNA sequences of 13 protein-coding genes. For this analysis, the complete mitochondrial genomes of seven octocoral and two scyphozoan species were newly sequenced and combined with all available mitogenomic data from GenBank. Five reliable fossil dates were used to calibrate the Bayesian estimates of divergence times. The molecular evidence suggests that cnidarians originated 741 million years ago (Ma) (95% credible region of 686-819), and the major taxa diversified prior to the Cambrian (543 Ma). The Octocorallia and Scleractinia may have originated from radiations of survivors of the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, which matches their fossil record well. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                14 October 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 10
                : e0139068
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
                [2 ]Computing and Information Services, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, Washington District of Columbia, United States of America
                [5 ]Biological Sciences Graduate Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
                [6 ]Department of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California, United States of America
                [7 ]Department of Biology, The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana, United States of America
                [8 ]Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                [9 ]National Systematics Laboratory of NOAA’s Fisheries Service, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
                [10 ]Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, United States of America
                UC Irvine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: PC CWD. Performed the experiments: FEG SS. Analyzed the data: FZ. Wrote the paper: PC FZ CWD. Assembled 454 data and performed initial analyses: SAS. Performed SOWH tests: SHC. Generated Hydractinia and Podocoryna data: SMS PC. Led octocoral sampling: CSM SCF. Led hexacoral sampling: MD. Generated Alatina alata data: CLA AGC PC. Collected many medusozoans: SHDH. Assisted with data management, submission, and analysis implementation: MH. Drew line illustrations of animals: FEG.

                [¤a]

                Current address: Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, Washington District of Columbia, United States of America

                [¤b]

                Current address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America

                [¤c]

                Current address: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

                [¤d]

                Current address: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America

                Article
                PONE-D-15-30190
                10.1371/journal.pone.0139068
                4605497
                26465609
                b0e58305-45bb-4614-9163-b87b9a43a76d

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication

                History
                : 9 July 2015
                : 7 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Pages: 13
                Funding
                This project was supported by the National Science Foundation ( http://www.nsf.gov) Cnidarian Tree of Life Project (DEB 05-31799 to PC and AGC), National Science Foundation DEB-0953571 to PC and the National Science Foundation Alan T Waterman Award to CWD. Sequencing at the Brown Genomics Core facility was supported in part by National Institutes of Health ( http://www.nih.gov) P30RR031153 and National Science Foundation EPSCoR EPS-1004057. Data transfer was supported by National Science Foundation RII-C2 EPS-1005789. Analyses were conducted with computational resources and services at the Center for Computation and Visualization at Brown University, supported in part by the National Science Foundation EPSCoR EPS-1004057 and the State of Rhode Island. Cubozoan samples were collected by CLA thanks to research funds from a Smithsonian Peter Buck Fellowship and Iridian Genomes Inc. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                Raw sequence data: NCBI Sequence Read Archive BioProject PRJNA263637, BioSample accession numbers: SAMN03418506-SAMN03418515, SAMN03453085-SAMN03453089. Analysis scripts, phylogenetic alignmets, tree sets, summary trees, and voucher information: https://bitbucket.org/caseywdunn/cnidaria2014. The most recent commit at the time of submission is available at: https://bitbucket.org/caseywdunn/cnidaria2014/src/333c9e4770881860f0ed09c99d86995377da2ff1 Phylogenetic data also available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4b6d3.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article