5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Early Changes in Rat Heart After High‐Dose Irradiation: Implications for Antiarrhythmic Effects of Cardiac Radioablation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Noninvasive cardiac radioablation is employed to treat ventricular arrhythmia. However, myocardial changes leading to early‐period antiarrhythmic effects induced by high‐dose irradiation are unknown. This study investigated dose‐responsive histologic, ultrastructural, and functional changes within 1 month after irradiation in rat heart.

          Methods and Results

          Whole hearts of wild‐type Lewis rats (N=95) were irradiated with single fraction 20, 25, 30, 40, or 50 Gy and explanted at 1 day or 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks’ postirradiation. Microscopic pathologic changes of cardiac structures by light microscope with immunohistopathologic staining, ultrastructure by electron microscopy, and functional evaluation by ECG and echocardiography were studied. Despite high‐dose irradiation, no myocardial necrosis and apoptosis were observed. Intercalated discs were widened and disrupted, forming uneven and twisted junctions between adjacent myocytes. Diffuse vacuolization peaked at 3 weeks, suggesting irradiation dose‐responsiveness, which was correlated with interstitial and intracellular edema. CD68 immunostaining accompanying vacuolization suggested mononuclear cell infiltration. These changes were prominent in working myocardium but not cardiac conduction tissue. Intracardiac conduction represented by PR and QTc intervals on ECG was delayed compared with baseline measurements. ST segment was initially depressed and gradually elevated. Ventricular chamber dimensions and function remained intact without pericardial effusion.

          Conclusions

          Mononuclear cell–related intracellular and extracellular edema with diffuse vacuolization and intercalated disc widening were observed within 1 month after high‐dose irradiation. ECG indicated intracardiac conduction delay with prominent ST‐segment changes. These observations suggest that early antiarrhythmic effects after cardiac radioablation result from conduction disturbances and membrane potential alterations without necrosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Noninvasive Cardiac Radiation for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

          BACKGROUND Recent advances have enabled noninvasive mapping of cardiac arrhythmias with electrocardiographic imaging and noninvasive delivery of precise ablative radiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We combined these techniques to perform catheter-free, electrophysiology-guided, noninvasive cardiac radioablation for ventricular tachycardia. METHODS We targeted arrhythmogenic scar regions by combining anatomical imaging with noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging during ventricular tachycardia that was induced by means of an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD). SBRT simulation, planning, and treatments were performed with the use of standard techniques. Patients were treated with a single fraction of 25 Gy while awake. Efficacy was assessed by counting episodes of ventricular tachycardia, as recorded by ICDs. Safety was assessed by means of serial cardiac and thoracic imaging. RESULTS From April through November 2015, five patients with high-risk, refractory ventricular tachycardia underwent treatment. The mean noninvasive ablation time was 14 minutes (range, 11 to 18). During the 3 months before treatment, the patients had a combined history of 6577 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. During a 6-week postablation “blanking period” (when arrhythmias may occur owing to postablation inflammation), there were 680 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. After the 6-week blanking period, there were 4 episodes of ventricular tachycardia over the next 46 patient-months, for a reduction from baseline of 99.9%. A reduction in episodes of ventricular tachycardia occurred in all five patients. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction did not decrease with treatment. At 3 months, adjacent lung showed opacities consistent with mild inflammatory changes, which had resolved by 1 year. CONCLUSIONS In five patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia, noninvasive treatment with electrophysiology-guided cardiac radioablation markedly reduced the burden of ventricular tachycardia. (Funded by Barnes–Jewish Hospital Foundation and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase I/II Trial of Electrophysiology-Guided Noninvasive Cardiac Radioablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

            Case studies have suggested the efficacy of catheter-free, electrophysiology-guided noninvasive cardiac radioablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), though prospective data is lacking. We conducted a prospective phase I/II trial of noninvasive cardiac radioablation in adults with treatment-refractory episodes of VT or cardiomyopathy related to premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Arrhythmogenic scar regions were targeted by combining noninvasive anatomic and electrical cardiac imaging with a standard SBRT workflow followed by delivery of a single fraction of 25 Gray (Gy) to the target. The primary safety endpoint was treatment-related serious adverse events (SAE) in the first 90 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was any reduction in VT episodes (tracked by indwelling ICDs) or any reduction in PVC burden (as measured by 24-hour Holter monitor) comparing the 6 months before and after treatment (with a 6 week blanking window after treatment). Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire. Nineteen patients were enrolled (17 for VT, 2 for PVC-cardiomyopathy). Median noninvasive ablation time was 15.3 minutes (range, 5.4–32.3). In the first 90 days, 2/19 patients (10.5%) developed a treatment-related SAE. Median number of VT episodes was reduced from 119 (range 4–292) to 3 (range 0–31, p < 0.001). Reduction was observed for both ICD shocks and anti-tachycardia pacing. VT episodes or PVC burden were reduced in 17/18 evaluable patients (94%). The frequency of VT episodes or PVC burden was reduced by 75% in 89% of patients. Overall survival was 89% at 6 months and 72% at 12 months. Use of dual antiarrhythmic medications decreased from 59% to 12% (p=0.008). Quality of life improved in 5 of 9 SF-36 domains at 6 months. Noninvasive electrophysiology-guided cardiac radioablation is associated with markedly reduced ventricular arrhythmia burden with modest short-term risks, reduction in antiarrhythmic drug use, and improvement in quality of life. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT02919618
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radiation-induced fibrosis: mechanisms and implications for therapy.

              Radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) is a long-term side effect of external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer. It results in a multitude of symptoms that significantly impact quality of life. Understanding the mechanisms of RIF-induced changes is essential to developing effective strategies to prevent long-term disability and discomfort following radiation therapy. In this review, we describe the current understanding of the etiology, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, treatment, and directions of future therapy for this condition. A literature review of publications describing mechanisms or treatments of RIF was performed. Specific databases utilized included PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov, using keywords "Radiation-Induced Fibrosis," "Radiotherapy Complications," "Fibrosis Therapy," and other closely related terms. RIF is the result of a misguided wound healing response. In addition to causing direct DNA damage, ionizing radiation generates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that lead to localized inflammation. This inflammatory process ultimately evolves into a fibrotic one characterized by increased collagen deposition, poor vascularity, and scarring. Tumor growth factor beta serves as the primary mediator in this response along with a host of other cytokines and growth factors. Current therapies have largely been directed toward these molecular targets and their associated signaling pathways. Although RIF is widely prevalent among patients undergoing radiation therapy and significantly impacts quality of life, there is still much to learn about its pathogenesis and mechanisms. Current treatments have stemmed from this understanding, and it is anticipated that further elucidation will be essential for the development of more effective therapies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                seil@snu.ac.kr
                jh.chang@snu.ac.kr
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                04 March 2021
                16 March 2021
                : 10
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.v10.6 )
                : e019072
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Seoul National University Hospital Seoul South Korea
                [ 2 ] Departments of Pathology Seoul National University Hospital Seoul South Korea
                [ 3 ] Department of Radiation Oncology Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Korea
                [ 4 ] Department of Radiation Oncology Seoul National University Hospital Seoul South Korea
                [ 5 ] Cancer Research Institute Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Korea
                [ 6 ] Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Korea
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Ji Hyun Chang, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak‐ro, Jongno‐gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. E‐mail: jh.chang@ 123456snu.ac.kr

                and

                Seil Oh, MD, PhD, FESC, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak‐ro, Jongno‐gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. E‐mail: seil@ 123456snu.ac.kr

                [*]

                Professor Oh and Professor Chang contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6180-0157
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-1805
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-9615
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5921-5522
                Article
                JAH35988
                10.1161/JAHA.120.019072
                8174197
                33660526
                b0eaeb44-aa66-488a-9731-af63cf0b6059
                © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 19 October 2020
                : 14 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 11, Words: 5821
                Funding
                Funded by: National Research Foundation of Korea , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100003725;
                Award ID: NRF‐2018M2A2B3A01070410
                Award ID: NRF‐2020R1A2C1013832
                Funded by: Ministry of Science & Information Communication Technology
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 16, 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.1 mode:remove_FC converted:09.04.2021

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                antiarrhythmic effect,cardiac radioablation,radiation,rats,ventricular arrhythmia,animal models of human disease,mechanisms,pathophysiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article