1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Three-Dimensional UTE MR Imaging: Twelve-Month Analysis of ACL Autograft Remodeling

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          Post-reconstruction imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is needed to non-invasively assess in vivo graft maturity before release to play. The purpose of this study was to evaluate autograft remodeling up to 12 months after ACL reconstruction using 3D ultra-short time to echo (UTE) T2* MRI. We hypothesized that the T2* values of ACL autografts would progressively change over time, initially resembling the values for the native contralateral graft source and gradually approaching that of the intact contralateral ACL.

          Methods:

          After IRB approval, 12 patients (ages 14-45 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with semitendinosus (SemiT) or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft were enrolled. Patients with a history of prior injury or surgery to either knee were excluded. Subjects returned for UTE MRIs at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after ACLR. Imaging at 1-month included the contralateral knee. All scans were performed on a Philips Ingenia 3T system. MRI pulse sequences included high-resolution 3D T2 (slice thickness: 0.6mm, TR: 18.7ms; TE: 11.5ms) and a four-echo T2 UTE (slice thickness: 1mm, TR: 20ms; TE: 0.3, 3.3, 6.3, and 9.3ms). Using high-resolution 3D T2 sequences at 1 month, all slices containing the intra-articular ACL were segmented semi-automatically to generate volumetric regions of interest (ROIs) (Materialise, Inc.; Leuven, Belgium). ROIs were divided into proximal/distal and core/peripheral sub-ROIs using standardized methods. Each ROI was co-registered voxel-by-voxel to T2* maps also obtained at 1 month. These T2* maps were then co-registered with those of subsequent time points. The segmentation process was repeated for the 1-, 3-, and 6-month time points by a second reviewer for inter-observer reliability (κ). Statistical differences among the ROIs and sub-ROIs of ACL autografts were assessed with repeated-measures ANOVA and two-tailed non-parametric t-tests. P<0.05 represented statistical significance.

          Results:

          Twelve subjects were enrolled in this prospective study, and after 2 subjects withdrew, 10 subjects were included in the analysis (n=7 SemiT; n=3 BTB). Nine of 10 subjects attended all postoperative imaging sessions at the time of this writing. Inter-observer reliability for T2* values was found to be excellent (κ=0.832; 95% CI [0.70-0.91]; p<0.001). Average T2* relaxation times increased from 3.2ms (standard deviation [SD], 1.0) at 1 month, to 4.8ms (SD, 1.8) at 6 months, and 4.1ms (SD, 1.6) at 12 months (Figures 1 and 2), with statistically significant differences between the intact ACL and 1-month time point (p=0.01), and between the 1- and 6-month time points (p=0.004). The ratio of T2*[inj]/T2*[intact] increased from 59.2% at 1 month to 79.8% at 12 months for SemiT autografts, and from 86.9% at 1 month to 97.2% at 12 months for BTB autografts (p=0.001). Significant differences were found between the following pairs of sub-ROIs when combining all time points: proximal/distal, proximal-peripheral/proximal-core, distal-peripheral/distal-core (p<0.02 each).

          Conclusions:

          ACL autografts exhibited progressively increasing T2* values and T2*[inj]/T2*[intact] ratios up to 12 months after ACLR, and these changes appear to be region-dependent. UTE T2* MR imaging can provide unique insights into the condition of remodeling ACL grafts, and may improve our ability to non-invasively assess graft maturity before allowing patients to resume high-intensity activities.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Orthop J Sports Med
          Orthop J Sports Med
          OJS
          spojs
          Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
          SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
          2325-9671
          31 July 2020
          July 2020
          : 8
          : 7 suppl6 , AOSSM 2020 Annual Meeting Abstracts
          : 2325967120S00479
          Affiliations
          [1-2325967120S00479]UT Houston, University of Texas at Houston
          Article
          10.1177_2325967120S00479
          10.1177/2325967120S00479
          7405675
          b10b4f37-47fa-4610-a38e-7fb55c2ec55e
          © The Author(s) 2020

          This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.

          History
          Categories
          Article
          Custom metadata
          ts3

          Comments

          Comment on this article