5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brief report: How short is too short? An ultra-brief measure of the big-five personality domains implicates “agreeableness” as a risk for all-cause mortality

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Controversy exists over the use of brief Big Five scales in health studies. We investigated links between an ultra-brief measure, the Big Five Inventory-10, and mortality in the General Social Survey. The Agreeableness scale was associated with elevated mortality risk (hazard ratio = 1.26, p = .017). This effect was attributable to the reversed-scored item “Tends to find fault with others,” so that greater fault-finding predicted lower mortality risk. The Conscientiousness scale approached meta-analytic estimates, which were not precise enough for significance. Those seeking Big Five measurement in health studies should be aware that the Big Five Inventory-10 may yield unusual results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis.

          To derive a robust and comprehensive estimate of the overall relation between Big Five personality traits and health variables using metasynthesis (i.e., second-order meta-analysis).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Can’t We Make It Any Shorter?

            Psychological constructs are becoming increasingly important in social surveys. Scales for the assessment of these constructs are usually developed primarily for individual assessment and decision-making. Hence, in order to guarantee high levels of reliability, measurement precision, and validity, these scales are in most cases much too long to be applied in surveys. Such settings call for extremely short measures validated for the population as a whole. However, despite the unquestionable demand, appropriate measures are still lacking. There are several reasons for this. In particular, short scales have often been criticized for their potential psychometric shortcomings with regard to reliability and validity. In this article, the authors discuss the advantages of short scales as alternative measures in large-scale surveys. Possible reasons for the assumed limited psychometric qualities of short scales will be highlighted. The authors show that commonly used reliability estimators are not always appropriate for judging the quality of scales with a minimal number of items, and they offer recommendations for alternative estimation methods and suggestions for the construction of a thorough short scale.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Problems with the Big Five assessment in the World Values Survey

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Health Psychol
                J Health Psychol
                HPQ
                sphpq
                Journal of Health Psychology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1359-1053
                1461-7277
                03 August 2017
                September 2019
                : 24
                : 11
                : 1568-1573
                Affiliations
                [1-1359105317720819]University of Rochester Medical Center, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Benjamin P Chapman, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Boulevard, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Email: ben_chapman@ 123456urmc.rochester.edu
                Article
                10.1177_1359105317720819
                10.1177/1359105317720819
                5794667
                28810502
                b134dda2-f450-4959-8267-867037f8f348
                © The Author(s) 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000049;
                Award ID: R01AG044588
                Categories
                Articles

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                all-cause mortality,bfi-10,big five personality traits,brief scales,general social survey

                Comments

                Comment on this article