20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification and Validation Model for Informative Liquid Biopsy-Based microRNA Biomarkers: Insights from Germ Cell Tumor In Vitro, In Vivo and Patient-Derived Data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Liquid biopsy-based biomarkers, such as microRNAs, represent valuable tools for patient management, but often do not make it to integration in the clinic. We aim to explore issues impeding this transition, in the setting of germ cell tumors, for which novel biomarkers are needed. We describe a model for identifying and validating clinically relevant microRNAs for germ cell tumor patients, using both in vitro, in vivo (mouse model) and patient-derived data. Initial wide screening of candidate microRNAs is performed, followed by targeted profiling of potentially relevant biomarkers. We demonstrate the relevance of appropriate (negative) controls, experimental conditions (proliferation), and issues related to sample origin (serum, plasma, cerebral spinal fluid) and pre-analytical variables (hemolysis, contaminants, temperature), all of which could interfere with liquid biopsy-based studies and their conclusions. Finally, we show the value of our identification model in a specific scenario, contradicting the presumed role of miR-375 as marker of teratoma histology in liquid biopsy setting. Our findings indicate other putative microRNAs (miR-885-5p, miR-448 and miR-197-3p) fulfilling this clinical need. The identification model is informative to identify the best candidate microRNAs to pursue in a clinical setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples.

          Costs can hamper the evaluation of the effectiveness of new biomarkers. Analysis of smaller numbers of pooled specimens has been shown to be a useful cost-cutting technique. The Youden index (J), a function of sensitivity (q) and specificity (p), is a commonly used measure of overall diagnostic effectiveness. More importantly, J is the maximum vertical distance or difference between the ROC curve and the diagonal or chance line; it occurs at the cut-point that optimizes the biomarker's differentiating ability when equal weight is given to sensitivity and specificity. Using the additive property of the gamma and normal distributions, we present a method to estimate the Youden index and the optimal cut-point, and extend its applications to pooled samples. We study the effect of pooling when only a fixed number of individuals are available for testing, and pooling is carried out to save on the number of assays. We measure loss of information by the change in root mean squared error of the estimates of the optimal cut-point and the Youden index, and we study the extent of this loss via a simulation study. In conclusion, pooling can result in a substantial cost reduction while preserving the effectiveness of estimators, especially when the pool size is not very large.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical utility of circulating non-coding RNAs — an update

            Over the past decade, the amount of research and the number of publications on associations between circulating small and long non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and cancer have grown exponentially. Particular focus has been placed on the development of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to enable efficient patient management - from early detection of cancer to monitoring for disease recurrence or progression after treatment. Owing to their high abundance and stability, circulating ncRNAs have potential utility as non-invasive, blood-based biomarkers that can provide information on tumour biology and the effects of treatments, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Increasing evidence highlights the roles of ncRNAs in cell-to-cell communication, with a number of ncRNAs having the capacity to regulate gene expression outside of the cell of origin through extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer to recipient cells, with implications for cancer progression and therapy resistance. Moreover, 'foreign' microRNAs (miRNAs) encoded by non-human genomes (so-called xeno-miRNAs), such as viral miRNAs, have been shown to be present in human body fluids and can be used as biomarkers. Herein, we review the latest developments in the use of circulating ncRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and discuss their roles in cell-to-cell communication in the context of cancer. We provide a compendium of miRNAs and long ncRNAs that have been reported in the literature to be present in human body fluids and that have the potential to be used as diagnostic and prognostic cancer biomarkers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Impact of Hemolysis on Cell-Free microRNA Biomarkers

              Cell-free microRNAs in plasma and serum have become a promising source of biomarkers for various diseases. Despite rapid progress in this field, there remains a lack of consensus regarding optimal quantification methods, reference genes, and quality control of samples. Recent studies have shown that hemolysis occurring during blood collection has substantial impact on the microRNA content in plasma/serum. To date, the impact of hemolysis has only been investigated for a limited number of microRNAs, mainly the red blood cell (RBC)-enriched miRs-16 and -451. In contrast, the effect of hemolysis on other microRNAs – in particular those proposed as biomarkers – has not been addressed. In this study we profiled the microRNA content of hemolyzed and non-hemolyzed plasma as well as RBCs to obtain a profile of microRNAs in the circulation affected or unaffected by hemolysis. Profiling by TaqMan Array Microfluidic Cards was used to compare three pairs of hemolyzed and non-hemolyzed plasma (with varying degrees of hemolysis) and one RBC sample. A total of 136 microRNAs were detectable in at least two of the samples, and of those 15 were at least twofold elevated in all three hemolyzed samples. This number increased to 88 microRNAs for the sample with the highest level of hemolysis, with all of these also detected in the RBC profile. Thus these microRNAs represent a large proportion of detectable microRNAs and those most likely to be affected by hemolysis. Several of the hemolysis-susceptible microRNAs (e.g., miRs-21, -106a, -92a, -17, -16) have also been previously proposed as plasma/serum biomarkers of disease, highlighting the importance of rigorous quality control of plasma/serum samples used for measurement of circulating microRNAs. As low-level hemolysis is a frequent occurrence during plasma/serum collection it is critical that this is taken into account in the measurement of any candidate circulating microRNA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cells
                Cells
                cells
                Cells
                MDPI
                2073-4409
                14 December 2019
                December 2019
                : 8
                : 12
                : 1637
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; henrique@ 123456ipoporto.min-saude.pt
                [3 ]Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (GEBC CI-IPOP) and Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (P.CCC), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; carmenjeronimo@ 123456ipoporto.min-saude.pt
                [4 ]Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-513 Porto, Portugal
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, Lab. for Exp. Patho-Oncology (LEPO), Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Cancer Institute, Be-432A, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; l.dorssers@ 123456erasmusmc.nl
                [6 ]University Bremen, Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany; belge@ 123456uni-bremen.de
                [7 ]Department of Urology, Hodentumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany & Department of Urology, Albertinen Krankenhaus, Paul Ehrlich Strasse 1, 22763 Hamburg, Germany; dieckmannkp@ 123456gmail.com
                [8 ]Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Cancer Institute, Be-432A, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; h.roest@ 123456erasmusmc.nl (H.P.R.);
                [9 ]University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; j.a.gietema@ 123456umcg.nl
                [10 ]Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Ave., 3-130, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; Rob.Hamilton@ 123456uhn.ca
                [11 ]Central Laboratory Animal Facility, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, Leiden 2333 ZC, The Netherlands; d.c.f.salvatori@ 123456lumc.nl
                [12 ]Department of Pathobiology, Anatomy and Physiology Division, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: l.looijenga@ 123456prinsesmaximacentrum.nl ; Tel.: +31-88-972-5211
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-1391
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-3450
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0651-5334
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-5345
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-4666
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-7116
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-1911
                Article
                cells-08-01637
                10.3390/cells8121637
                6952794
                31847394
                b143b33b-7793-4d2b-bcf6-beab78976182
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 October 2019
                : 13 December 2019
                Categories
                Article

                cell lines,liquid biopsies,micrornas,mouse xenograft model,germ cell tumors

                Comments

                Comment on this article