22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using the risk behaviour diagnosis scale to understand Australian Aboriginal smoking — A cross-sectional validation survey in regional New South Wales

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To validate, for the first time, the Risk Behaviour Diagnosis (RBD) Scale for Aboriginal Australian tobacco smokers, based on the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). Despite high smoking prevalence, little is known about how Indigenous peoples assess their smoking risks.

          Methods

          In a cross-sectional study of 121 aboriginal smokers aged 18–45 in regional New South Wales, in 2014, RBD subscales were assessed for internal consistency. Scales included measures of perceived threat (susceptibility to and severity of smoking risks) and perceived efficacy (response efficacy and self-efficacy for quitting). An Aboriginal community panel appraised face and content validity. EPPM constructs of danger control (protective motivation) and fear control (defensive motivation) were assessed for cogency.

          Results

          Scales had acceptable to good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.65–1.0). Most participants demonstrated high-perceived threat (77%, n = 93); and half had high-perceived efficacy (52%, n = 63). High-perceived efficacy with high-threat appeared consistent with danger control dominance; low-perceived efficacy with high-threat was consistent with fear control dominance.

          Conclusions

          In these Aboriginal smokers of reproductive age, the RBD Scale appeared valid and reliable. Further research is required to assess whether the RBD Scale and EPPM can predict quit attempts and assist with tailored approaches to counselling and targeted health promotion campaigns.

          Highlights

          • First study on the Risk Behaviour Diagnosis (RBD) Scale in an Indigenous population

          • Perceived efficacy and threat relate to intention to quit smoking in this sample.

          • High-threat high-efficacy had the strongest evidence for danger control responses.

          • The RBD Scale may help develop tailored anti-tobacco messages for Indigenous smokers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predicting risk behaviors: development and validation of a diagnostic scale.

          The goal of this study was to develop and validate the Risk Behavior Diagnosis (RBD) Scale for use by health care providers and practitioners interested in promoting healthy behaviors. Theoretically guided by the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM; a fear appeal theory), the RBD scale was designed to work in conjunction with an easy-to-use formula to determine which types of health risk messages would be most appropriate for a given individual or audience. Because some health risk messages promote behavior change and others backfire, this type of scale offers guidance to practitioners on how to develop the best persuasive message possible to motivate healthy behaviors. The results of the study demonstrate the RBD scale to have a high degree of content, construct, and predictive validity. Specific examples and practical suggestions are offered to facilitate use of the scale for health practitioners.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory

            Despite decades of research, consensus regarding the dynamics of fear appeals remains elusive. A meta-analysis was conducted that was designed to resolve this controversy. Publications that were included in previous meta-analyses were re-analysed, and a number of additional publications were located. The inclusion criteria were full factorial orthogonal manipulations of threat and efficacy, and measurement of behaviour as an outcome. Fixed and random effects models were used to compute mean effect size estimates. Meta-analysis of the six studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria clearly showed a significant interaction between threat and efficacy, such that threat only had an effect under high efficacy (d = 0.31), and efficacy only had an effect under high threat (d = 0.71). Inconsistency in results regarding the effectiveness of threatening communication can likely be attributed to flawed methodology. Proper tests of fear appeal theory yielded the theoretically hypothesised interaction effect. Threatening communication should exclusively be used when pilot studies indicate that an intervention successfully enhances efficacy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns.

              The fear appeal literature is examined in a comprehensive synthesis using meta-analytical techniques. The meta-analysis suggests that strong fear appeals produce high levels of perceived severity and susceptibility, and are more persuasive than low or weak fear appeals. The results also indicate that fear appeals motivate adaptive danger control actions such as message acceptance and maladaptive fear control actions such as defensive avoidance or reactance. It appears that strong fear appeals and high-efficacy messages produce the greatest behavior change, whereas strong fear appeals with low-efficacy messages produce the greatest levels of defensive responses. Future directions and practical implications are provided.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Prev Med Rep
                Prev Med Rep
                Preventive Medicine Reports
                Elsevier
                2211-3355
                07 November 2014
                2015
                07 November 2014
                : 2
                : 4-9
                Affiliations
                [a ]College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia
                [b ]Southern Cross University, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales 2450, Australia
                [c ]College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia
                [d ]Indigenous Centre, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: P.O. Box 9077, Moonee Beach, New South Wales, 2450, Australia. gillian.gould1@ 123456my.jcu.edu.au
                Article
                S2211-3355(14)00013-8
                10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.10.004
                4721383
                26844043
                b19b50ff-9b0b-46a7-ba39-b32e4440b924
                © 2014 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Regular Article

                tobacco smoking,australian aborigines,indigenous population,risk behaviours,behavioural medicine,validation studies,smoking cessation,health promotion,mass media,health communication

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content190

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors118