37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment

      ,  
      American Political Science Review
      JSTOR

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We report the results of a randomized field experiment involving approximately 30,000 registered voters in New Haven, Connecticut. Nonpartisan get-out-the-vote messages were conveyed through personal canvassing, direct mail, and telephone calls shortly before the November 1998 election. A variety of substantive messages were used. Voter turnout was increased substantially by personal canvassing, slightly by direct mail, and not at all by telephone calls. These findings support our hypothesis that the long-term retrenchment in voter turnout is partly attributable to the decline in face-to-face political mobilization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Theory of the Calculus of Voting

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment

              The conventional wisdom about negative political advertisements holds that no one likes them, but they work, that is, they have the consequences their sponsors intend. Moreover, many analysts have expressed concern over the detrimental effects of such negativism on the American political system. We examine the accuracy of the conventional wisdom and the legitimacy of the fears about the consequences for the political system via meta-analysis, a systematic, quantitative review of the literature. The data do not support either contention. Negative political ads appear to be no more effective than positive ads and do not seem to have especially detrimental effects on the political system. Eleven subsidiary hypotheses about particular circumstances in which significant effects are likely to be found are tested and rejected. Discussion focuses on why negative political advertisements have become so popular in practice when there is so little evidence that they work especially well.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                American Political Science Review
                Am Polit Sci Rev
                JSTOR
                0003-0554
                1537-5943
                September 2000
                August 2014
                : 94
                : 03
                : 653-663
                Article
                10.2307/2585837
                b1a65432-82b8-422e-ad7f-e1e81e7de5f6
                © 2000
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article