19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Design thinking is a problem-solving framework that has been used to enhance patient experiences, improve clinical outcomes, and refine medical curricula. This study reviewed the use of design thinking in health professions education.

          Methods

          A search yielded 169 articles, which were excluded if they were: (1) not related to education; (2) lacking an application of design thinking; or (3) not associated with healthcare. The final review yielded 15 articles, which were analyzed using qualitative methods.

          Results

          All articles were published in 2009 or later and were diverse in their context, participants, and approach. Six studies emphasized the early stages of design thinking, with inspiration and ideation stages fostered through a variety of activities, such as lectures, small group discussions, and workshops. Studies examined a range of outcomes, including self-efficacy, perceptions, and solutions to a specific problem.

          Conclusions

          Our findings raise important considerations for health professions education, including the extent to which we should: 1) teach design thinking to students as a skill-based tool to prepare students for problem solving in complex healthcare environments; and 2) use design thinking to create, implement, and refine health professions curricula and educational programs. Despite the apparent benefits of design thinking, many questions for health professions education remain.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using Design Thinking to Improve Psychological Interventions: The Case of the Growth Mindset During the Transition to High School.

          There are many promising psychological interventions on the horizon, but there is no clear methodology for preparing them to be scaled up. Drawing on design thinking, the present research formalizes a methodology for redesigning and tailoring initial interventions. We test the methodology using the case of fixed versus growth mindsets during the transition to high school. Qualitative inquiry and rapid, iterative, randomized "A/B" experiments were conducted with ~3,000 participants to inform intervention revisions for this population. Next, two experimental evaluations showed that the revised growth mindset intervention was an improvement over previous versions in terms of short-term proxy outcomes (Study 1, N=7,501), and it improved 9(th) grade core-course GPA and reduced D/F GPAs for lower achieving students when delivered via the Internet under routine conditions with ~95% of students at 10 schools (Study 2, N=3,676). Although the intervention could still be improved even further, the current research provides a model for how to improve and scale interventions that begin to address pressing educational problems. It also provides insight into how to teach a growth mindset more effectively.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Design Thinking for Social Innovation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (919) 966-4557 , Jacqui_mclaughlin@unc.edu
                wolcottm@email.unc.edu
                dhubbard@email.unc.edu
                Kamyers2@ncsu.edu
                Traci_rider@ncsu.edu
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                4 April 2019
                4 April 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 98
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000122483208, GRID grid.10698.36, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, , UNC Chapel Hill, ; Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000122483208, GRID grid.10698.36, UNC Adams School of Dentistry, UNC Chapel Hill, ; Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000122483208, GRID grid.10698.36, UNC School of Medicine and UNC/NC State Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, UNC Chapel Hill, ; Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2173 6074, GRID grid.40803.3f, NC State University College of Design, ; Raleigh, North Carolina USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2173 6074, GRID grid.40803.3f, Design Initiative for Sustainability and Health, , NC State University College of Design, ; Raleigh, North Carolina USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000122483208, GRID grid.10698.36, Center for Innovative Pharmacy Education and Research, , UNC Chapel Hill, ; Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
                Article
                1528
                10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8
                6449899
                30947748
                b1dfd32d-672b-454a-af18-c8a5c9a54f01
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 December 2018
                : 21 March 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Education
                design thinking,curriculum development,creativity,problem solving,innovation
                Education
                design thinking, curriculum development, creativity, problem solving, innovation

                Comments

                Comment on this article