4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A scoping review and systematic mapping of health promotion interventions associated with obesity in Islamic religious settings in the UK

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Islamic religious settings (IRS) may be useful places to implement obesity interventions for Muslims. However, little is known about the level and nature of such activity in these settings. We searched bibliographic databases and grey literature, and requested grey information from Muslim organizations, local councils, and mosques in 13 selected areas in the United Kingdom. Thirty‐five interventions were identified; most were poorly described and not evaluated. Twenty‐seven interventions focused on physical activity behaviours, four on diet behaviours, one on both behaviours, and seven addressed long‐term conditions associated with obesity. Most interventions were led by volunteers from the congregation/faith leaders and were funded through donations from congregants or charity organizations. The evidence suggests that health promotion interventions in IRS have a relatively high reach. Obesity interventions are commonly delivered in UK IRS. Most target physical activity behaviours, are instigated and led by volunteers from the congregation or faith leaders, receive no public funding, and are only recorded in people's memories. High‐quality evaluations of well‐specified interventions in this context are needed. We suggest that the methods used in this review, including the learning around positionality of researchers, could be adopted by other researchers as a way to locate opportunities for effective community‐level interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned.

          Church-based health promotion (CBHP) interventions can reach broad populations and have great potential for reducing health disparities. From a socioecological perspective, churches and other religious organizations can influence members' behaviors at multiple levels of change. Formative research is essential to determine appropriate strategies and messages for diverse groups and denominations. A collaborative partnership approach utilizing principles of community-based participatory research, and involving churches in program design and delivery, is essential for recruitment, participation, and sustainability. For African Americans, health interventions that incorporate spiritual and cultural contextualization have been effective. Evidence indicates that CBHP programs have produced significant impacts on a variety of health behaviors. Key elements of CBHP are described with illustrations from the authors' research projects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reflections on Researcher Identity and Power: The Impact of Positionality on Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Processes and Outcomes

            The practice of community based participatory research (CBPR) has evolved over the past 20 years with the recognition that health equity is best achieved when academic researchers form collaborative partnerships with communities. This article theorizes the possibility that core principles of CBPR cannot be realistically applied unless unequal power relations are identified and addressed. It provides theoretical and empirical perspectives for understanding power, privilege, researcher identity and academic research team composition, and their effects on partnering processes and health disparity outcomes. The team's processes of conducting seven case studies of diverse partnerships in a national cross-site CBPR study are analyzed; the multi-disciplinary research team's self-reflections on identity and positionality are analyzed, privileging its combined racial, ethnic, and gendered life experiences, and integrating feminist and post-colonial theory into these reflections. Findings from the inquiry are shared, and incorporating academic researcher team identity is recommended as a core component of equalizing power distribution within CBPR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Heterogeneity of coronary heart disease risk factors in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and European origin populations: cross sectional study.

              To compare coronary risk factors and disease prevalence among Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis, and in all South Asians (these three groups together) with Europeans. Cross sectional survey. Newcastle upon Tyne. 259 Indian, 305 Pakistani, 120 Bangladeshi, and 825 European men and women aged 25-74 years. Social and economic circumstances, lifestyle, self reported symptoms and diseases, blood pressure, electrocardiogram, and anthropometric, haematological, and biochemical measurements. There were differences in social and economic circumstances, lifestyles, anthropometric measures and disease both between Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis and between all South Asians and Europeans. Bangladeshis and Pakistanis were the poorest groups. For most risk factors, the Bangladeshis (particularly men) fared the worst: smoking was most common (57%) in that group, and Bangladeshis had the highest concentrations of triglycerides (2.04 mmol/l) and fasting blood glucose (6.6 mmol/l) and the lowest concentration of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.97 mmol/l). Blood pressure, however, was lowest in Bangladeshis. Bangladeshis were the shortest (men 164 cm tall v 170 cm for Indians and 174 cm for Europeans). A higher proportion of Pakistani and Bangladeshi men had diabetes (22.4% and 26.6% respectively) than Indians (15.2%). Comparisons of all South Asians with Europeans hid some important differences, but South Asians were still disadvantaged in a wide range of risk factors. Findings in women were similar. Risk of coronary heart disease is not uniform among South Asians, and there are important differences between Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis for many coronary risk factors. The belief that, except for insulin resistance, South Asians have lower levels of coronary risk factors than Europeans is incorrect, and may have arisen from combining ethnic subgroups and examining a narrow range of factors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                carolyn.summerbell@durham.ac.uk
                Journal
                Obes Rev
                Obes Rev
                10.1111/(ISSN)1467-789X
                OBR
                Obesity Reviews
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1467-7881
                1467-789X
                05 June 2019
                September 2019
                : 20
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1111/obr.v20.9 )
                : 1231-1261
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [ 2 ] Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Bradford UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences Durham University Durham UK
                [ 4 ] Fuse, NIHR Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Carolyn Summerbell, Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, 42 Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HN, UK.

                Email: carolyn.summerbell@ 123456durham.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3250-0275
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9896-9503
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-9383
                Article
                OBR12874 OBR-12-18-3706.R1
                10.1111/obr.12874
                6851982
                31168939
                b1f96bc9-a4a6-4ac6-89d4-5a24fe17434a
                © 2019 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 10 December 2018
                : 16 March 2019
                : 02 April 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 31, Words: 7790
                Funding
                Funded by: Programme Development Grant , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100007602;
                Award ID: RP‐DG‐1215‐10002
                Categories
                Obesity Management
                Obesity Management
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:13.11.2019

                Medicine
                health promotion,interventions,islamic religious settings,obesity
                Medicine
                health promotion, interventions, islamic religious settings, obesity

                Comments

                Comment on this article