11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      From tangled banks to toxic bunnies; a reflection on the issues involved in developing an ecosystem approach for environmental radiation protection

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references117

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

            Ecological risk assessors face increasing demands to assess more chemicals, with greater speed and accuracy, and to do so using fewer resources and experimental animals. New approaches in biological and computational sciences may be able to generate mechanistic information that could help in meeting these challenges. However, to use mechanistic data to support chemical assessments, there is a need for effective translation of this information into endpoints meaningful to ecological risk-effects on survival, development, and reproduction in individual organisms and, by extension, impacts on populations. Here we discuss a framework designed for this purpose, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP). An AOP is a conceptual construct that portrays existing knowledge concerning the linkage between a direct molecular initiating event and an adverse outcome at a biological level of organization relevant to risk assessment. The practical utility of AOPs for ecological risk assessment of chemicals is illustrated using five case examples. The examples demonstrate how the AOP concept can focus toxicity testing in terms of species and endpoint selection, enhance across-chemical extrapolation, and support prediction of mixture effects. The examples also show how AOPs facilitate use of molecular or biochemical endpoints (sometimes referred to as biomarkers) for forecasting chemical impacts on individuals and populations. In the concluding sections of the paper, we discuss how AOPs can help to guide research that supports chemical risk assessments and advocate for the incorporation of this approach into a broader systems biology framework.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                International Journal of Radiation Biology
                International Journal of Radiation Biology
                Informa UK Limited
                0955-3002
                1362-3095
                June 03 2022
                July 21 2020
                June 03 2022
                : 98
                : 6
                : 1185-1200
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
                [2 ]CERAD, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway
                [3 ]Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                [4 ]Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
                [5 ]Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, PSE-SANTE/SDOS/LMDN, Cadarache, France
                [6 ]Integrated Center for Science and Humanities, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, Japan
                [7 ]UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK
                [8 ]Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA
                [9 ]Department of Biology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
                [10 ]Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
                [11 ]Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology, Obninsk, Russia
                [12 ]Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Auhtority, Østerås, Norway
                [13 ]School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
                [14 ]Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
                [15 ]School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
                [16 ]LK Consultancy, Alberta, Canada
                [17 ]Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
                [18 ]Environmental Physics Department, Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary
                [19 ]Department of Mathematics, Computational Foundry, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
                [20 ]National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”, Moscow, Russian Federation
                [21 ]School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
                Article
                10.1080/09553002.2020.1793022
                b200b251-d9c9-4927-8498-2fd3734acdf4
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article