7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mapping the research trends of third language acquisition: A bibliometric analysis based on Scopus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          L3 acquisition is gaining prominence in the academic community. The cardinal aim of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of research on L3 acquisition. 425 documents from the Scopus database were analyzed with Bibliometrix. To gain a general and systematic overview of research on L3 acquisition, we grounded our study on three main levels of bibliometric analysis: performance analysis, collaboration analysis, and thematic map. By doing so, we identified the most influential sources, authors, affiliations, countries, and documents, the scientific network among different constituents, as well as the evolution of research trends. The results suggest that L3 acquisition has experienced three periods: initial phase (1984–2008), development phase (2009–2014), and burst phase (2015–2022). The results also indicate that: (1) The International Journal of Multilingualism is the most steady source contributing to this field. (2) Relevant contributors for each period are recognized, including established and emerging researchers. (3) European countries such as Spain, United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, and Poland are at the forefront of publication. (4) Collaboration increases over time but is becoming increasingly oriented in European and Anglophone countries. (5) The research hotspots have shifted throughout time, encompass a broad range of fields, and continue to grow. The study results provide insights into the evolving trends of L3 acquisition studies and data to assist researchers in identifying research gaps.

          Related collections

          Most cited references151

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                03 November 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 1021517
                Affiliations
                School of Foreign Languages, East China Normal University , Shanghai, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, University of the Balearic Islands, Spain

                Reviewed by: Ge Lan, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Irini Mavrou, Nebrija University, Spain

                *Correspondence: Zhao Liu, zliu@ 123456english.ecnu.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021517
                9670133
                36405213
                b21244b8-1f28-4dd6-afb5-92cc08dffeb1
                Copyright © 2022 Liu.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 August 2022
                : 06 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 153, Pages: 25, Words: 16859
                Funding
                Funded by: tral Universities (East China Normal University)
                Award ID: [2021 ECNU-HWCBFBLW001] and [43800–20101-222201]
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                l3 acquisition,performance analysis,collaboration analysis,thematic map,systematic literature review

                Comments

                Comment on this article