3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Gender Differences in Leadership Positions Among Academic Nuclear Medicine Specialists in Canada and the United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Why aren't there more women leaders in academic medicine? the views of clinical department chairs.

          A scarcity of women in leadership positions in academic medicine has persisted despite their increasing numbers in medical training. To understand the barriers confronting women and potential remedies, clinical department chairs with extensive leadership experience were interviewed. In 1998-99, open-ended interviews averaging 80 minutes in length were conducted with 34 chairs and two division chiefs in five specialties. Individuals were selected to achieve a balance for gender, geographic locale, longevity in their positions, and sponsorship and research intensity of their institutions. The interviews were audiotaped and fully transcribed, and the themes reported emerged from inductive analysis of the responses using standard qualitative techniques. The chairs' responses centered on the constraints of traditional gender roles, manifestations of sexism in the medical environment, and lack of effective mentors. Their strategies for addressing these barriers ranged from individual or one-on-one interventions (e.g., counseling, confronting instances of bias, and arranging for appropriate mentors) to institutional changes (e.g., extending tenure probationary periods, instituting mechanisms for responding to unprofessional behavior, establishing mentoring networks across the university). The chairs universally acknowledged the existence of barriers to the advancement of women and proposed a spectrum of approaches to address them. Individual interventions, while adapting faculty to requirements, also tend to preserve existing institutional arrangements, including those that may have adverse effects on all faculty. Departmental or school-level changes address these shortcomings and have a greater likelihood of achieving enduring impact.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Finding a Way Through the Scientific Literature: Indexes and Measures

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Influences for Gender Disparity in Academic Neuroradiology.

              There has been extensive interest in promoting gender equality within radiology, a predominately male field. In this study, our aim was to quantify gender representation in neuroradiology faculty rankings and determine any related factors that may contribute to any such disparity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Roentgenology
                American Journal of Roentgenology
                American Roentgen Ray Society
                0361-803X
                1546-3141
                January 2019
                January 2019
                : 212
                : 1
                : 146-150
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
                [2 ]Department of Radiology, Emergency & Trauma Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Jim Pattison Pavilion, Ground Fl, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
                [3 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
                Article
                10.2214/AJR.18.20062
                30422710
                b21dc59a-c344-4aac-8a0e-fe493fc2cff5
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article