20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Beer/Bethe/Uexküll paper (1899) and misinterpretations surrounding 'vitalistic behaviorism'.

      1
      History and philosophy of the life sciences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the history of behaviorism the paper of the three physiologists Theodor Beer, Albrecht Bethe and Jakob von Uexküll from 1899 plays an important role. Many researchers were influenced by this paper and identified it as fundamental for objective psychological research. But during the period of its adoption (1900-1925) psychologists did not notice that Beer, Bethe and Uexküll had distanced themselves from their own paper, because it had been ignored in physiological and biological discussions. Moreover, one of the three (Beer) had to resign from the scientific community because of private scandal and another one (Uexküll) changed all of his views and left the base of objective science for subjective vitalism. However, this did not change his adoption of behaviorism.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Hist Philos Life Sci
          History and philosophy of the life sciences
          0391-9714
          0391-9714
          2006
          : 28
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Institute for the History of Medicine, Lessingstrasse 2, 80336 Munich, Germany.
          Article
          17702502
          b2397e1e-4aaa-4960-90d3-a2a2fefc5655
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article