49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To evaluate electroretinogram (ERG) changes after silicone oil removal.

          Methods

          Scotopic and photopic ERGs, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were checked before and shortly after silicone oil removal in eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy and silicone oil injection for complex retinal detachment. Pre- and postoperative ERG a- and b-wave amplitudes were compared.

          Results

          Twenty-eight eyes of 28 patients including 20 male and 8 female subjects with mean age of 39.3 ± 0.06 (range, 12 to 85) years were studied. Mean interval from primary vitreoretinal surgery to silicone oil removal was 21.04 ± 0.52 (range, 7 to 39) months. Mean duration from silicone oil removal to second ERG was 13.04 ± 1.75 (range, 10 to 16) days. Before silicone oil removal, mean a-wave amplitudes in maximal combined response, rod response and cone response ERGs were 27.4 ± 19.9, 7.2 ± 4.5 and 5.5 ± 3.4 μv, respectively. These values increased to 48.8 ± 31.9, 15.1 ± 14.4 and 17.4 ± 22.2 μv, respectively after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). Mean b-wave amplitudes in the same order, were 69.41 ± 51, 41.2 ± 30.4 and 25.1 ± 33.9 μv before silicone oil removal, increasing to 165.6 ± 102.5, 81.7 ± 53.7 and 44.7 ± 34.1 μv respectively, after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). Mean BCVA significantly improved from 1.10 ± 0.34 at baseline to 1.02 ± 0.33 logMAR after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001).

          Conclusion

          The amplitudes of ERG a- and b-waves under scotopic and photopic conditions increased significantly shortly after silicone oil removal. An increase in BCVA was also observed. These changes may be explained by the insulating effect of silicone oil on the retina.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The use of liquid silicone in retinal detachment surgery.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term results of vitrectomy and silicone oil in 500 cases of complicated retinal detachments.

            We retrospectively analyzed by life table analysis the visual and functional results in 500 eyes that underwent combined vitrectomy and silicone oil for various types of complicated retinal detachments. The cumulative proportion of eyes with attached retina was 77% at six months postoperatively, with a range of 71% for perforating injuries to 85% for posterior holes. The proportion of eyes with a visual acuity of 5/200 or better was 69% at six months, with a range of 56% for perforating injuries to 81% for posterior holes. Sixty-nine eyes had poor visual function despite an attached retina, primarily because of cataract (18 eyes) and preexisting retinal or optic disease (31 eyes). Visual function in eyes with clear optical media and an attached retina was stable over time, except in patients with diabetes. No clinical evidence of retinal toxicity to silicone oil was noted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Silicone oil injection in the treatment of massive preretinal retraction. II. Late complications in 93 eyes.

              Long-term assessment of eyes in which silicone oil injection had been used in the treatment of retinal detachment with massive preretinal retraction was undertaken in 92 consecutive patients. While a high incidence of complications, particularly cataract, was confirmed, this study showed that they were probably caused not by any toxic effect of silicone oil but by obstruction of normal metabolic exchange at the silicone-tissue interface. The incidence of complications causing deterioration of vision or serious symptoms was not found to be high, and navigating vision was well preserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Ophthalmic Vis Res
                J Ophthalmic Vis Res
                JOVR
                Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
                Ophthalmic Research Center
                2008-2010
                2008-322X
                April 2011
                : 6
                : 2
                : 109-113
                Affiliations
                Ophthalmic Research Center, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Mohsen Azarmina, MD. Associate Professor of Ophthalmology; Ophthalmic Research Center, #23 Paidarfard St., Boostan 9 St., Pasdaran, Tehran 16666, Iran; Tel: +98 21 2258 5952, Fax: +98 21 2259 0607; e-mail: azarminam@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                jovr-6-2-109
                3306082
                22454719
                b23c066c-701b-4133-be4a-3fd7bcc711b5
                Copyright @ 2011

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 January 2011
                : 26 March 2011
                Categories
                Original Article

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                silicone oil,electroretinogram,vitrectomy
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                silicone oil, electroretinogram, vitrectomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article