30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of paranasal sinus invasion on advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy: the validity of advanced T stage of AJCC/UICC eighth edition staging system

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic role of paranasal sinus invasion in advanced NPC patients. Data of patients ( n = 295) with advanced NPC (T3/T4N0‐3 M0) treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Staging was according to the AJCC/ UICC eighth edition staging system. Overall survival ( OS), local recurrence‐free survival ( LRFS), distant metastasis‐free survival ( DMFS), and disease‐free survival ( DFS) were calculated, and differences were compared between patients with and without paranasal sinus invasion. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of different survival parameters. Paranasal sinus invasion was present in 126 of 295 (42.7%) patients. Sphenoid, ethmoid, maxillary, and frontal sinus involvements were present in 123 of 295 (41.7%), 95 of 295 (32.2%), 45 of 295 (15.3%), and 0 of 295 (0%), respectively. All survival parameters were significantly better in patients without paranasal sinus invasion. When paranasal sinus invasion was reclassified as T4 instead of T3, all survival rates, other than LRFS ( =  0.156), were significantly better in the new T3 patients, and differences in all survival parameters remained nonsignificant between T3 with paranasal sinus invasion and T4 without paranasal sinus invasion patients (all >  0.05). In multivariate analysis, paranasal sinus invasion was found to be an independent negative prognostic factor for OS, DFS, and DMFS ( =  0.016, =  0.004, and =  0.006, respectively), but not for LRFS ( =  0.068). Paranasal sinus invasion has prognostic value in advanced NPC. It may be reasonable to classify paranasal sinus invasion as T4 stage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Proposal for the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

          An accurate staging system is crucial for cancer management. Evaluations for continual suitability and improvement are needed as staging and treatment methods evolve.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prognostic nomogram for refining the prognostication of the proposed 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

            Objective To develop a nomogram for refining prognostication for patients with non-disseminated nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) staged with the proposed AJCC/UICC 8 th edition. Material and methods Consecutive patients investigated by magnetic resonance imaging, staged by the proposed AJCC/UICC 8 th edition, and irradiated by intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) from June 2005 to December 2010 were analyzed. The cohort of 1197 patients treated at Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital was used as the training set and the results were validated by 412 patients from Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors for developing a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS). The discriminative ability was assessed with concordance index (C-index). Patients were categorized into three risk groups by performing recursive partitioning algorithm (RPA) on the survival scores of the combined set. Results Multivariable analysis showed that age, gross primary tumor volume (GTV-P) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were independent prognostic factors for OS in addition to stage-group. The OS nomogram based on all these factors had a statistically higher bias-corrected C-index than prognostication based on stage-group alone (0.712 vs 0.622, p <0.01). These results were consistent for both the training and the validation cohorts. Patients with <135 points were categorized as low-risk, ≥135–<160 points as intermediate-risk and ≥160 points as high-risk, respectively. Their 5-year OS rates were 92%, 84% and 58%, respectively. Conclusions The proposed nomogram could improve prognostication when compared with TNM stage-group. This could aid in risk stratification for individual NPC patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How does magnetic resonance imaging influence staging according to AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with computed tomography?

              To analyze the degree and pattern of influence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on staging according to the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system compared with computed tomography (CT). The MRI and CT scans and medical records of 420 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) were analyzed retrospectively. The tumors of all patients were staged according to the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. A significant difference (p <0.05) was found between CT and MRI in demonstrating involvement in the oropharynx (CT, 25.0% vs. MRI, 14.5%), prevertebral muscle (CT, 18.4% vs. MRI, 36.0%), parapharyngeal space (CT, 82.6% vs. MRI, 68.8%), skull base (CT, 31.0% vs. MRI, 52.6%), sphenoid sinus (CT, 13.6% vs. MRI, 16.7%), ethmoid sinus (CT, 7.1% vs. MRI, 3.3%), intracranial area (CT, 4.8% vs. MRI, 16.0%), and retropharyngeal lymph nodes (CT, 52.1% vs. MRI, 69.0%). The incidence of cervical lymph node metastasis and lymph node metastasis at each level was similar according to CT and MRI. MRI resulted in changes in 49.8% of T stage cases, 10.7% of N stage cases, and 38.6% of clinical stage cases. MRI demonstrated early primary tumor involvement more precisely and deep primary tumor infiltration more easily. The use of MRI caused dramatic changes in the results of the T stage and clinical staging and should be preferred to CT in staging NPC. Patients would benefit from changes in treatment strategies resulting from the use of MRI.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                heyuxiang88@163.com
                lfshen2008@163.com
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                01 May 2018
                July 2018
                : 7
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.2018.7.issue-7 )
                : 2826-2836
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Oncology Xiangya Hospital Central South University No. 87, Xiangya Road Changsha Hunan Province 410008 China
                [ 2 ] Department of Radiology Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha China
                [ 3 ] Department of Nuclear Medicine Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Yuxiang He, Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, P.R. China. Tel: +8613786112914. Fax: +86073189753336 Email: heyuxiang88@ 123456163.com

                Liangfang Shen, Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan Province 410008, China. Tel: +8613975805137; Fax: +86073189753336; E‐mail: lfshen2008@ 123456163.com

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this article.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0711-0854
                Article
                CAM41506
                10.1002/cam4.1506
                6051156
                29717544
                b2629e53-036e-4acc-a5e1-8e25e835c5d9
                © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 February 2018
                : 27 March 2018
                : 27 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 11, Words: 5680
                Funding
                Funded by: Hunan Department of Science and Technology Foundation, China
                Award ID: 2016SK2007
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cam41506
                July 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.4.3 mode:remove_FC converted:18.07.2018

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                intensity‐modulated radiation therapy,nasopharyngeal carcinoma,paranasal sinus,prognosis,staging

                Comments

                Comment on this article