29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genomic Tools and Selective Breeding in Molluscs

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The production of most farmed molluscs, including mussels, oysters, scallops, abalone, and clams, is heavily dependent on natural seed from the plankton. Closing the lifecycle of species in hatcheries can secure independence from wild stocks and enables long-term genetic improvement of broodstock through selective breeding. Genomic techniques have the potential to revolutionize hatchery-based selective breeding by improving our understanding of the characteristics of mollusc genetics that can pose a challenge for intensive aquaculture and by providing a new suite of tools for genetic improvement. Here we review characteristics of the life history and genetics of molluscs including high fecundity, self-fertilization, high genetic diversity, genetic load, high incidence of deleterious mutations and segregation distortion, and critically assess their impact on the design and effectiveness of selective breeding strategies. A survey of the results of current breeding programs in the literature show that selective breeding with inbreeding control is likely the best strategy for genetic improvement of most molluscs, and on average growth rate can be improved by 10% per generation and disease resistance by 15% per generation across the major farmed species by implementing individual or family-based selection. Rapid advances in sequencing technology have resulted in a wealth of genomic resources for key species with the potential to greatly improve hatchery-based selective breeding of molluscs. In this review, we catalog the range of genomic resources currently available for molluscs of aquaculture interest and discuss the bottlenecks, including lack of high-quality reference genomes and the relatively high cost of genotyping, as well as opportunities for applying genomics-based selection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references146

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The genetics of inbreeding depression.

          Inbreeding depression - the reduced survival and fertility of offspring of related individuals - occurs in wild animal and plant populations as well as in humans, indicating that genetic variation in fitness traits exists in natural populations. Inbreeding depression is important in the evolution of outcrossing mating systems and, because intercrossing inbred strains improves yield (heterosis), which is important in crop breeding, the genetic basis of these effects has been debated since the early twentieth century. Classical genetic studies and modern molecular evolutionary approaches now suggest that inbreeding depression and heterosis are predominantly caused by the presence of recessive deleterious mutations in populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The function of heat-shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals.

              Within-species genetic diversity is thought to reflect population size, history, ecology, and ability to adapt. Using a comprehensive collection of polymorphism data sets covering approximately 3000 animal species, we show that the widely used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) marker does not reflect species abundance or ecology: mtDNA diversity is not higher in invertebrates than in vertebrates, in marine than in terrestrial species, or in small than in large organisms. Nuclear loci, in contrast, fit these intuitive expectations. The unexpected mitochondrial diversity distribution is explained by recurrent adaptive evolution, challenging the neutral theory of molecular evolution and questioning the relevance of mtDNA in biodiversity and conservation studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Genet.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-8021
                18 July 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 253
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Biology, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews , St Andrews, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Xelect Ltd , St Andrews, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Nguyen Hong Nguyen, University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia

                Reviewed by: Yniv Palti, Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture Research (USDA-ARS), United States; Scott Newman, Genus (United Kingdom), United Kingdom; Pierre Boudry, Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), France

                *Correspondence: Christopher M. Hollenbeck ch263@ 123456st-andrews.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Livestock Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

                Article
                10.3389/fgene.2018.00253
                6058216
                30073016
                b28b6cda-4fe0-4c19-8395-b41f3764577f
                Copyright © 2018 Hollenbeck and Johnston.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 November 2017
                : 25 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 174, Pages: 15, Words: 13097
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 10.13039/501100007601
                Award ID: 654008
                Categories
                Genetics
                Review

                Genetics
                aquaculture,genomics,snp genotyping,heritability,marker assisted selection,genomic selection,molluscs,selective breeding

                Comments

                Comment on this article