13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Seed Quality Traits Can Be Predicted with High Accuracy in Brassica napus Using Genomic Data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Improving seed oil yield and quality are central targets in rapeseed ( Brassica napus) breeding. The primary goal of our study was to examine and compare the potential and the limits of marker-assisted selection and genome-wide prediction of six important seed quality traits of B. napus. Our study is based on a bi-parental population comprising 202 doubled haploid lines and a diverse validation set including 117 B. napus inbred lines derived from interspecific crosses between B. rapa and B. carinata. We used phenotypic data for seed oil, protein, erucic acid, linolenic acid, stearic acid, and glucosinolate content. All lines were genotyped with a 60k SNP array. We performed five-fold cross-validations in combination with linkage mapping and four genome-wide prediction approaches in the bi-parental population. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) with large effects were detected for erucic acid, stearic acid, and glucosinolate content, blazing the trail for marker-assisted selection. Despite substantial differences in the complexity of the genetic architecture of the six traits, genome-wide prediction models had only minor impacts on the prediction accuracies. We evaluated the effects of training population size, marker density and phenotyping intensity on the prediction accuracy. The prediction accuracy in the independent and genetically very distinct validation set still amounted to 0.14 for protein content and 0.17 for oil content reflecting the utility of the developed calibration models even in very diverse backgrounds.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet.

          The use of all available molecular markers in statistical models for prediction of quantitative traits has led to what could be termed a genomic-assisted selection paradigm in animal and plant breeding. This article provides a critical review of some theoretical and statistical concepts in the context of genomic-assisted genetic evaluation of animals and crops. First, relationships between the (Bayesian) variance of marker effects in some regression models and additive genetic variance are examined under standard assumptions. Second, the connection between marker genotypes and resemblance between relatives is explored, and linkages between a marker-based model and the infinitesimal model are reviewed. Third, issues associated with the use of Bayesian models for marker-assisted selection, with a focus on the role of the priors, are examined from a theoretical angle. The sensitivity of a Bayesian specification that has been proposed (called "Bayes A") with respect to priors is illustrated with a simulation. Methods that can solve potential shortcomings of some of these Bayesian regression procedures are discussed briefly.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

            We compared the accuracies of four genomic-selection prediction methods as affected by marker density, level of linkage disequilibrium (LD), quantitative trait locus (QTL) number, sample size, and level of replication in populations generated from multiple inbred lines. Marker data on 42 two-row spring barley inbred lines were used to simulate high and low LD populations from multiple inbred line crosses: the first included many small full-sib families and the second was derived from five generations of random mating. True breeding values (TBV) were simulated on the basis of 20 or 80 additive QTL. Methods used to derive genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were random regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP), Bayes-B, a Bayesian shrinkage regression method, and BLUP from a mixed model analysis using a relationship matrix calculated from marker data. Using the best methods, accuracies of GEBV were comparable to accuracies from phenotype for predicting TBV without requiring the time and expense of field evaluation. We identified a trade-off between a method's ability to capture marker-QTL LD vs. marker-based relatedness of individuals. The Bayesian shrinkage regression method primarily captured LD, the BLUP methods captured relationships, while Bayes-B captured both. Under most of the study scenarios, mixed-model analysis using a marker-derived relationship matrix (BLUP) was more accurate than methods that directly estimated marker effects, suggesting that relationship information was more valuable than LD information. When markers were in strong LD with large-effect QTL, or when predictions were made on individuals several generations removed from the training data set, however, the ranking of method performance was reversed and BLUP had the lowest accuracy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Associative transcriptomics of traits in the polyploid crop species Brassica napus.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                23 November 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 11
                : e0166624
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
                [2 ]Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben, Germany
                New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: JZ JCR.

                • Data curation: JZ MW JLM.

                • Formal analysis: YSZ JZ MW.

                • Funding acquisition: JZ.

                • Methodology: YSZ JZ PFL JCR.

                • Project administration: JZ JCR.

                • Resources: JLM JZ LS XHW.

                • Software: YSZ JCR JZ.

                • Supervision: JZ JCR.

                • Validation: YSZ MW PFL JZ.

                • Writing – original draft: JZ YSZ.

                • Writing – review & editing: JCR JLM.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-12815
                10.1371/journal.pone.0166624
                5120799
                27880793
                b29bba29-59cc-49ef-aa27-89b813ef9df5
                © 2016 Zou et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 March 2016
                : 1 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: National Basic Research Program of China
                Award ID: Grant No. 2015CB150200
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Key Research and Development Program of China
                Award ID: No.2016YFD0101300
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province Key Program
                Award ID: 2014CFA008
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2015CB150200), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2016YFD0101300), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province Key Program 2014CFA008. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Lipids
                Oils
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Flowering Plants
                Rapeseed
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biotechnology
                Plant Biotechnology
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Biotechnology
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Plant Genetics
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Genetics
                Plant Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Lipids
                Fatty Acids
                Stearic Acid
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genetic Loci
                Quantitative Trait Loci
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Forecasting
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Forecasting
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Population Genetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Population Genetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Genetics
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article