8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Development of Gonadotropins for Clinical Use in the Treatment of Infertility

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The first commercially available gonadotropin product was a human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) extract, followed by animal pituitary gonadotropin extracts. These extracts were effective, leading to the introduction of the two-step protocol, which involved ovarian stimulation using animal gonadotropins followed by ovulation triggering using hCG. However, ovarian response to animal gonadotropins was maintained for only a short period of time due to immune recognition. This prompted the development of human pituitary gonadotropins; however, supply problems, the risk for Creutzfeld–Jakob disease, and the advent of recombinant technology eventually led to the withdrawal of human pituitary gonadotropin from the market. Urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations were also produced, with subsequent improvements in purification techniques enabling development of products with standardized proportions of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) activity. In 1962 the first reported pregnancy following ovulation stimulation with hMG and ovulation induction with hCG was described, and this product was later established as part of the standard protocol for ART. Improvements in immunopurification techniques enabled the removal of LH from hMG preparations; however, unidentified urinary protein contaminants remained a problem. Subsequently, monoclonal FSH antibodies were used to produce a highly purified FSH preparation containing <0.1 IU of LH activity and <5% unidentified urinary proteins, enabling the formulation of smaller injection volumes that could be administered subcutaneously rather than intramuscularly. Ongoing issues with gonadotropins derived from urine donations, including batch-to-batch variability and a finite donor supply, were overcome by the development of recombinant gonadotropin products. The first recombinant human FSH molecules received marketing approvals in 1995 (follitropin alfa) and 1996 (follitropin beta). These had superior purity and a more homogenous glycosylation pattern compared with urinary or pituitary FSH. Subsequently recombinant versions of LH and hCG have been developed, and biosimilar versions of follitropin alfa have received marketing authorization. More recent developments include a recombinant FSH produced using a human cell line, and a long-acting FSH preparation. These state of the art products are administered subcutaneously via pen injection devices.

          Related collections

          Most cited references115

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles.

          While live birth is the principal clinical outcome following in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, the number of eggs retrieved following ovarian stimulation is often used as a surrogate outcome in clinical practice and research. The aim of this study was to explore the association between egg number and live birth following IVF treatment and identify the number of eggs that would optimize the IVF outcome. Anonymized data on all IVF cycles performed in the UK from April 1991 to June 2008 were obtained from the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA). We analysed data from 400 135 IVF cycles. A logistic model was fitted to predict live birth using fractional polynomials to handle the number of eggs as a continuous independent variable. The prediction model, which was validated on a separate HFEA data set, allowed the estimation of the probability of live birth for a given number of eggs, stratified by age group. We produced a nomogram to predict the live birth rate (LBR) following IVF based on the number of eggs and the age of the female. The median number of eggs retrieved per cycle was 9 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 6-13]. The overall LBR was 21.3% per fresh IVF cycle. There was a strong association between the number of eggs and LBR; LBR rose with an increasing number of eggs up to ∼15, plateaued between 15 and 20 eggs and steadily declined beyond 20 eggs. During 2006-2007, the predicted LBR for women with 15 eggs retrieved in age groups 18-34, 35-37, 38-39 and 40 years and over was 40, 36, 27 and 16%, respectively. There was a steady increase in the LBR per egg retrieved over time since 1991. The relationship between the number of eggs and live birth, across all female age groups, suggests that the number of eggs in IVF is a robust surrogate outcome for clinical success. The results showed a non-linear relationship between the number of eggs and LBR following IVF treatment. The number of eggs to maximize the LBR is ∼15.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women

            To evaluate the association between the number of oocytes retrieved and cumulative live birth rates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus?

              Traditionally, IVF success rates have been reported in terms of live birth per fresh cycle or embryo transfer. With the increasing use of embryo freezing and thawing it is essential that we report not only outcomes following fresh but also those after frozen embryo transfer as a complete measure of success of an IVF treatment. Most people agree that an individual's chance of having a baby following fresh and frozen embryo transfer should be described as cumulative live birth rate. However, views on the most appropriate parameters required to calculate such an outcome have been inconsistent. There is an additional dimension-time for all frozen embryos to be used up by a couple, which can influence the outcome. Given that cumulative live birth rate is generally perceived to be the preferred reporting system in IVF, it is time to have an international consensus on how this statistic is calculated, reported and interpreted by stakeholders across the world.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
                Front. Endocrinol.
                Frontiers in Endocrinology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2392
                03 July 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 429
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University , Ramat Gan, Israel
                [2] 2Medical Affairs Fertility, Endocrinology and General Medicine, Merck Serono GmbH , Darmstadt, Germany
                [3] 3Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA , Darmstadt, Germany
                [4] 4Global Clinical Development, EMD Serono , Rockland, MA, United States
                [5] 5A Business of Merck KGaA , Darmstadt, Germany
                [6] 6Organ Systems, Group Biomedical Sciences, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven (University of Leuven) , Leuven, Belgium
                [7] 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University , New Haven, CT, United States
                [8] 8Assisted Conception Unit, King's College London, Guy's Hospital , London, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Manuela Simoni, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy

                Reviewed by: Carlo Alviggi, University of Naples Federico II, Italy; Sandro C. Esteves, Androfert, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Brazil

                *Correspondence: Bruno Lunenfeld blunenfeld@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Reproduction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology

                Article
                10.3389/fendo.2019.00429
                6616070
                31333582
                b2a83477-0482-476f-a930-a0642d5b83a5
                Copyright © 2019 Lunenfeld, Bilger, Longobardi, Alam, D'Hooghe and Sunkara.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 April 2019
                : 14 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 144, Pages: 15, Words: 12933
                Categories
                Endocrinology
                Review

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                recombinant gonadotropin,follicle stimulating hormone,luteinizing hormone,fertility,pregnancy,pre-clinical,clinical

                Comments

                Comment on this article