28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      IMMUTANS does not act as a stress-induced safety valve in the protection of the photosynthetic apparatus of Arabidopsis during steady-state photosynthesis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          IMMUTANS (IM) encodes a thylakoid membrane protein that has been hypothesized to act as a terminal oxidase that couples the reduction of O(2) to the oxidation of the plastoquinone (PQ) pool of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Because IM shares sequence similarity to the stress-induced mitochondrial alternative oxidase (AOX), it has been suggested that the protein encoded by IM acts as a safety valve during the generation of excess photosynthetically generated electrons. We combined in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence quenching analyses with measurements of the redox state of P(700) to assess the capacity of IM to compete with photosystem I for intersystem electrons during steady-state photosynthesis in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Comparisons were made between wild-type plants, im mutant plants, as well as transgenics in which IM protein levels had been overexpressed six (OE-6 x) and 16 (OE-16 x) times. Immunoblots indicated that IM abundance was the only major variant that we could detect between these genotypes. Overexpression of IM did not result in increased capacity to keep the PQ pool oxidized compared to either the wild type or im grown under control conditions (25 degrees C and photosynthetic photon flux density of 150 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1)). Similar results were observed either after 3-d cold stress at 5 degrees C or after full-leaf expansion at 5 degrees C and photosynthetic photon flux density of 150 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1). Furthermore, IM abundance did not enhance protection of either photosystem II or photosystem I from photoinhibition at either 25 degrees C or 5 degrees C. Our in vivo data indicate that modulation of IM expression and polypeptide accumulation does not alter the flux of intersystem electrons to P(700)(+) during steady-state photosynthesis and does not provide any significant photoprotection. In contrast to AOX1a, meta-analyses of published Arabidopsis microarray data indicated that IM expression exhibited minimal modulation in response to myriad abiotic stresses, which is consistent with our functional data. However, IM exhibited significant modulation in response to development in concert with changes in AOX1a expression. Thus, neither our functional analyses of the IM knockout and overexpression lines nor meta-analyses of gene expression support the model that IM acts as a safety valve to regulate the redox state of the PQ pool during stress and acclimation. Rather, IM appears to be strongly regulated by developmental stage of Arabidopsis.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Plant Physiol
          Plant physiology
          American Society of Plant Biologists (ASPB)
          0032-0889
          0032-0889
          Oct 2006
          : 142
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Biology and The Biotron, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.
          Article
          pp.106.085886
          10.1104/pp.106.085886
          1586030
          16891546
          b2ccb102-0db2-429a-9dcd-326c2609e5a6
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article